Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[browser][http] Add support for AllowAutoRedirect. #41394
[browser][http] Add support for AllowAutoRedirect. #41394
Changes from 7 commits
74fa272
edbef4d
aa48db1
97d72af
70a5f25
5e9423d
677ea00
e3e3a3e
424ca12
b877f64
21d0489
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@karelz who could review this part? Should we try harder to map the result to status codes or expose that differently to the developers?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hello everyone. Is there any update on this?
/cc @marek-safar @karelz @ManickaP
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Also there is a line in the PR comments about mapping a result and the approach for this PR:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
CC @dotnet/ncl
Hrm this is an interesting one. It seems like there is not a perfect solution here -- fetch API seems poorly made. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Without setting a normal redirect status code, we break compat with any existing code handling redirects.
But, it seems wrong to fake a status code when we don't know what the actual status code was. If we were to fake a status code, a temporary redirect seems like the best choice -- permanent redirect could cause dangerous handling e.g. updating a URI in a database.
To add a third bad option, what do we think of this? It at least gives the user some flexibility here.
(note, using a status code like this may not be advisable as an on-by-default option, as you might have some code doing e.g.
if(StatusCode >= 500)
)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If I am understanding the above wouldn't this change the Public API as well?