Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Forbid
- byref cnst
->+ (byref -cnst)
transformation. #44266Forbid
- byref cnst
->+ (byref -cnst)
transformation. #44266Changes from 3 commits
546cc65
660dad6
db8b3ff
6318887
8d1d5d4
f81f6c9
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do you need conv.i4 before returning the value? Stack has
native int
, but method returnsint32
.If you need the method to return 100, you could allocate a 101 element array and subtract the managed reference between the first element and last element.
The difference between a stack location and a static field that this is returning right now is a very random number.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You are right, I will fix the test to always return 100 instead of a random number.
I am not an expert in ECMA so I am very glad that you are looking at the test, thank you.
My understanding is that ECMA allows implicit coercion of
native int
toint
so I do not need a cast there.However, I could read it wrong and can add a cast just for safety.
from ECMA, page 38:
I.8.7.3 General assignment compatibility:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I believe that @sandreenko is correct that this implicit conversion is allowed.