Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add explicit null-check for tailcalls to VSD #62719

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 14, 2021
Merged

Conversation

jakobbotsch
Copy link
Member

@jakobbotsch jakobbotsch commented Dec 13, 2021

There is already a comment that this is necessary, but it is only being
done for x86 tailcalls via jit helper. Do it for normal tailcalls to VSD
as well.

Fix #61486

@dotnet-issue-labeler dotnet-issue-labeler bot added the area-CodeGen-coreclr CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI label Dec 13, 2021
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Dec 13, 2021

Tagging subscribers to this area: @JulieLeeMSFT
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

There is already a comment that this is necessary, but it is only being
done for x86 tailcalls via jit helper. Do it for normal tailcalls to VSD
as well.

Author: jakobbotsch
Assignees: -
Labels:

area-CodeGen-coreclr

Milestone: -

There is already a comment that this is necessary, but it is only being
done for x86 tailcalls via jit helper. Do it for normal tailcalls to VSD
as well.

Fix dotnet#61486
@jakobbotsch
Copy link
Member Author

/azp run runtime-coreclr jitstress, runtime-coreclr outerloop

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 2 pipeline(s).

@jakobbotsch
Copy link
Member Author

For ARM64 this adds 4 bytes to every VSD tail call while on x64 it adds 2 bytes. Diffs showing the size increase.

@jakobbotsch
Copy link
Member Author

cc @dotnet/jit-contrib @janvorli @jkotas

@k15tfu
Copy link
Contributor

k15tfu commented Dec 14, 2021

Hi! Do you plan to back port this fix to 6.0?

@jakobbotsch
Copy link
Member Author

@k15tfu Yes, I think this is a good candidate for backporting.

@jakobbotsch
Copy link
Member Author

/backport to release/6.0

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Started backporting to release/6.0: https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/actions/runs/1577668274

@ghost ghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 13, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
area-CodeGen-coreclr CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Access Violation through reflection not caught as NRE on .NET 6
4 participants