Fixed error messages on collections indexing #67696

B1Z0N · 2022-04-07T10:44:24Z

About

There are multiple libraries that have ArgumentOutOfRange_Index error message in their resource files. Even if it states that

Index was out of range. Must be non-negative and less than the size of the collection.

In some libraries it's used even in the situations where index being equal to the size of the collection is allowed.

System.Private.CoreLib
System.Collections
System.Collections.NonGeneric
System.Text.Encoding.CodePages
Every such library was modified to throw appropriate message on appropriate occasion.

In some libraries it's used solely in appropriate case of "throw if index >= size". So the message is ok here.

System.Security.Cryptography.Xml
System.Security.Cryptography.Pkcs
System.Security.Cryptography
For the sake of future development of the library they were split into ArgumentOutOfRange_IndexMustBeLessThan and ArgumentOutOfRange_IndexMustBeLessThanOrEqual too. Just to be consistent throughout the repo.

In some libraries it's included in resource files but never used.

System.Console
System.Diagnostics.Process
The same as previous.

Other

`ThrowHelper`

Some of ThrowHelper methods too were splitted into two. That's

ThrowArgumentOutOfRange_IndexException
ThrowStartIndexArgumentOutOfRange_ArgumentOutOfRange_Index

Docs

On msdn probably lots of methods with wrong Exceptions sectors. Like List<T>.IndexOf here:

This one actually CAN accept index that equals to it's length.

I think it's important to fix it too. I've created an issue, and hopefully will come to PR in dotnet-api-docs repo.

ghost · 2022-04-07T10:44:33Z

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-system-collections
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Fixes #67423

About

There are multiple libraries that have ArgumentOutOfRange_Index error message in their resource files. Even if it states that

Index was out of range. Must be non-negative and less than the size of the collection.

In some libraries it's used even in the situations where index being equal to the size of the collection is allowed.

System.Private.CoreLib
System.Collections
System.Collections.NonGeneric
System.Text.Encoding.CodePages
Every such library was modified to throw appropriate message on appropriate occasion.

In some libraries it's used solely in appropriate case of "throw if index >= size". So the message is ok here.

System.Security.Cryptography.Xml
System.Security.Cryptography.Pkcs
System.Security.Cryptography
But maybe for the sake of future development of the library we should split it into ArgumentOutOfRange_IndexMustBeLT and ArgumentOutOfRange_IndexMustBeLE too? Just to be consistent throughout the repo.

In some libraries it's included in resource files but never used.

System.Console
System.Diagnostics.Process
Should we remove it from there, leave as is or split it like in previous question?

Other

`ThrowHelper`

Some of ThrowHelper methods too were splitted into two. That's

ThrowArgumentOutOfRange_IndexException
ThrowStartIndexArgumentOutOfRange_ArgumentOutOfRange_Index

Docs

On msdn probably lots of methods with wrong Exceptions sectors. Like List<T>.IndexOf here:

This one actually CAN accept index that equals to it's length.

I want to fix it, but I thought it would be quite a piece of a commitment, so decided to ask first: may I?

Author:	B1Z0N
Assignees:	-
Labels:	`area-System.Collections`
Milestone:	-

B1Z0N · 2022-04-07T10:48:24Z

src/libraries/System.Private.CoreLib/src/System/String.cs


            if (length <= 0)
            {
                if (length == 0)
                    return Array.Empty<char>();
-                throw new ArgumentOutOfRangeException(nameof(length), SR.ArgumentOutOfRange_Index);
+                throw new ArgumentOutOfRangeException(nameof(length), SR.ArgumentOutOfRange_NegativeLength);


Also this minor wrong error message was fixed here. Now on negative length it actually signals about negative length and not about some indexing errors.

B1Z0N · 2022-04-07T18:46:09Z

/azp run dotnet-linker-tests

azure-pipelines · 2022-04-07T18:46:14Z

Commenter does not have sufficient privileges for PR 67696 in repo dotnet/runtime

danmoseley · 2022-04-07T20:06:10Z

/azp run dotnet-linker-tests

azure-pipelines · 2022-04-07T20:06:20Z

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

danmoseley · 2022-04-07T20:07:02Z

You need write permissions to ask azp for extra configurations so I did it. Although, how are linker tests relevant here?

B1Z0N · 2022-04-07T20:13:00Z

You need write permissions to ask azp for extra configurations so I did it. Although, how are linker tests relevant here?

Thanks a lot for help with rerun!

I'm kinda new contributor and just trying to sort out why this is failing. I tried getting access to any logs on errors, but haven't managed to do that. Linker error stated something about git fetch exit code 128, so I thought it might be just some internal thing and decided to retry.

Ah, and force push there was just my way to trigger rerun. Probably not the best one :)

danmoseley · 2022-04-07T21:41:41Z

@B1Z0N gotcha. what you can do is close and reopen the PR. That's most costly though as it reruns everything from the start.

@jkoritzinsky is this familiar? obviously not related to this change.

  Starting:    LibraryImportGenerator.Unit.Tests (parallel test collections = on, max threads = 4)
    LibraryImportGenerator.UnitTests.Compiles.ValidateSnippetsWithMarshalType [SKIP]
      No current scenarios to test.
Fatal error. System.AccessViolationException: Attempted to read or write protected memory. This is often an indication that other memory is corrupt.
   at System.Reflection.Metadata.MetadataReader.InitializeTableReaders(System.Reflection.Internal.MemoryBlock, System.Reflection.Metadata.Ecma335.HeapSizes, Int32[], Int32[])
   at System.Reflection.Metadata.MetadataReader..ctor(Byte*, Int32, System.Reflection.Metadata.MetadataReaderOptions, System.Reflection.Metadata.MetadataStringDecoder, System.Object)
   at System.Reflection.Metadata.PEReaderExtensions.GetMetadataReader(System.Reflection.PortableExecutable.PEReader, System.Reflection.Metadata.MetadataReaderOptions, System.Reflection.Metadata.MetadataStringDecoder)
   at Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.PEModule.InitializeMetadataReader()
   at Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.PEModule.get_MetadataReader()
   at Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.PEModule.GetMetadataModuleNamesOrThrow()
   at Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.AssemblyMetadata.GetOrCreateData()
   at Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.AssemblyMetadata.GetModules()
   at Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.AssemblyMetadata.IsValidAssembly()

src/libraries/System.Collections/src/Resources/Strings.resx

Separated "Must be less than the size" and "Must be less than or equal to the size" error messages. Now first one goes in "throw on index >= size case" and the second goes in "throw on index > size". Fix dotnet#67423

B1Z0N · 2022-04-11T14:52:20Z

Hi! It's been a few days since I've pushed changes. May someone take a look please? Or point me into if I'm missing something. Thanks for your time.

@marek-safar @MichalStrehovsky @danmoseley

danmoseley · 2022-04-12T15:28:20Z

src/coreclr/System.Private.CoreLib/src/System/Collections/EmptyReadOnlyDictionaryInternal.cs

@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ public void CopyTo(Array array!!, int index)
                throw new ArgumentOutOfRangeException(nameof(index), SR.ArgumentOutOfRange_NeedNonNegNum);

            if (array.Length - index < this.Count)
-                throw new ArgumentException(SR.ArgumentOutOfRange_Index, nameof(index));
+                throw new ArgumentException(SR.ArgumentOutOfRange_IndexMustBeLessOrEqual, nameof(index));


This is fine, although I see Arg_ArrayPlusOffTooSmall is used elsewhere

Oh, nm you're just renaming

marek-safar · 2022-04-12T15:42:05Z

@danmoseley you looked into this already could you approve?

danmoseley · 2022-04-12T16:03:59Z

Yeah, reading through it now..

src/libraries/System.Private.CoreLib/src/System/Globalization/CompareInfo.cs

src/libraries/System.Private.CoreLib/src/System/Text/StringBuilder.cs

danmoseley · 2022-04-12T16:17:22Z

Looks good to me with a couple comments?
TBH, in many of these cases, neither message is ideal because eg the count passed is also relevant. But they aren't getting worse.

…CompareInfo.cs Co-authored-by: Dan Moseley <danmose@microsoft.com>

danmoseley

thanks @B1Z0N

B1Z0N · 2022-04-13T10:05:13Z

@danmoseley these errors seem to be unrelated as they are present in other PR builds. What should I do now?🤔

danmoseley · 2022-04-13T15:11:28Z

Thanks. Perhaps you're interested in another contribution?

B1Z0N · 2022-04-13T15:27:44Z

Actually, pretty much interested. I like how the this community contribution process is arranged. Thanks to you, including. Why are you asking😅?

danmoseley · 2022-04-13T15:48:43Z

Just because I appreciate and enjoy working with new contributors and hope we can grow our community here.
The main bottleneck is generally code reviews. There is a certain number of committers who can review. As contributors get more familiar with working in the repo, reviews tend to get quicker. Either way smaller changes are easier to review and can often flow much faster than larger ones.

AndyAyersMS · 2022-04-22T18:17:21Z

We're seeing some perf regressions that might be a result of this change: dotnet/perf-autofiling-issues#4738, eg:

Looking at the change I don't have a good explanation as to why it might cause these specific regressions, so more investigation is needed.

See also #68338.

B1Z0N · 2022-04-25T14:36:37Z

src/libraries/System.Private.CoreLib/src/System/BitConverter.cs

-            if (startIndex > value.Length - 1)
-                ThrowHelper.ThrowArgumentOutOfRangeException(ExceptionArgument.startIndex, ExceptionResource.ArgumentOutOfRange_Index); // differs from other overloads, which throw base ArgumentException
+                ThrowHelper.ThrowArgumentOutOfRangeException(ExceptionArgument.startIndex, ExceptionResource.ArgumentOutOfRange_IndexMustBeLess);
+            if (startIndex >= value.Length)


Hi 👋

Probably, dotnet/perf-autofiling-issues#4738 and #68338 are my bad. Here I've changed to >= so that it'd be more consistent(>=, ...IndexMustBeLess) and more readable.

But after seeing this benchmark and being able to reproduce it, I've reverted my commit and compared it's performance to upstream. I've found out that it's my commit that causing this and somehow, on jit asm level >= approx two times slower then > len - 1. So I've fixed it and got the benchmark result:

Method Job Toolchain Mean Error StdDev Median Min Max Ratio RatioSD Allocated Alloc Ratio

ReadStructAndReverseBE Job-FQAXKT /runtime.fixed/artifacts/bin/testhost/net7.0-Linux-Release-x64/shared/Microsoft.NETCore.App/7.0.0/corerun 11.345 ns 0.1365 ns 0.1277 ns 11.394 ns 11.116 ns 11.477 ns 0.98 0.01 - NA

ReadStructAndReverseBE Job-KKCPCD /runtime/artifacts/bin/testhost/net7.0-Linux-Release-x64/shared/Microsoft.NETCore.App/7.0.0/corerun 11.566 ns 0.0608 ns 0.0539 ns 11.568 ns 11.472 ns 11.660 ns 1.00 0.00 - NA

ReadStructAndReverseLE Job-FQAXKT /runtime.fixed/artifacts/bin/testhost/net7.0-Linux-Release-x64/shared/Microsoft.NETCore.App/7.0.0/corerun 1.992 ns 0.0726 ns 0.0679 ns 1.981 ns 1.831 ns 2.133 ns 1.01 0.03 - NA

ReadStructAndReverseLE Job-KKCPCD /runtime/artifacts/bin/testhost/net7.0-Linux-Release-x64/shared/Microsoft.NETCore.App/7.0.0/corerun 1.983 ns 0.0088 ns 0.0078 ns 1.984 ns 1.962 ns 1.994 ns 1.00 0.00 - NA

ReadStructFieldByFieldBE Job-FQAXKT /runtime.fixed/artifacts/bin/testhost/net7.0-Linux-Release-x64/shared/Microsoft.NETCore.App/7.0.0/corerun 10.517 ns 0.5510 ns 0.5896 ns 10.242 ns 9.892 ns 12.019 ns 1.00 0.07 - NA

ReadStructFieldByFieldBE Job-KKCPCD /runtime/artifacts/bin/testhost/net7.0-Linux-Release-x64/shared/Microsoft.NETCore.App/7.0.0/corerun 10.478 ns 0.4902 ns 0.5645 ns 10.132 ns 9.623 ns 11.228 ns 1.00 0.00 - NA

ReadStructFieldByFieldLE Job-FQAXKT /runtime.fixed/artifacts/bin/testhost/net7.0-Linux-Release-x64/shared/Microsoft.NETCore.App/7.0.0/corerun 9.229 ns 0.0381 ns 0.0337 ns 9.227 ns 9.180 ns 9.296 ns 1.01 0.00 - NA

ReadStructFieldByFieldLE Job-KKCPCD /runtime/artifacts/bin/testhost/net7.0-Linux-Release-x64/shared/Microsoft.NETCore.App/7.0.0/corerun 9.139 ns 0.0066 ns 0.0055 ns 9.136 ns 9.133 ns 9.153 ns 1.00 0.00 - NA

ReadStructFieldByFieldUsingBitConverterLE Job-FQAXKT /runtime.fixed/artifacts/bin/testhost/net7.0-Linux-Release-x64/shared/Microsoft.NETCore.App/7.0.0/corerun 19.257 ns 0.1194 ns 0.0997 ns 19.255 ns 19.008 ns 19.404 ns 0.90 0.01 - NA

ReadStructFieldByFieldUsingBitConverterLE Job-KKCPCD /runtime/artifacts/bin/testhost/net7.0-Linux-Release-x64/shared/Microsoft.NETCore.App/7.0.0/corerun 21.446 ns 0.1205 ns 0.1127 ns 21.434 ns 21.258 ns 21.603 ns 1.00 0.00 - NA

ReadStructFieldByFieldUsingBitConverterBE Job-FQAXKT /runtime.fixed/artifacts/bin/testhost/net7.0-Linux-Release-x64/shared/Microsoft.NETCore.App/7.0.0/corerun 30.687 ns 0.0825 ns 0.0732 ns 30.695 ns 30.544 ns 30.804 ns 0.98 0.00 - NA

ReadStructFieldByFieldUsingBitConverterBE Job-KKCPCD /runtime/artifacts/bin/testhost/net7.0-Linux-Release-x64/shared/Microsoft.NETCore.App/7.0.0/corerun 31.372 ns 0.1749 ns 0.1636 ns 31.297 ns 31.221 ns 31.792 ns 1.00 0.00 - NA

MeasureReverseEndianness Job-FQAXKT /runtime.fixed/artifacts/bin/testhost/net7.0-Linux-Release-x64/shared/Microsoft.NETCore.App/7.0.0/corerun 402.172 ns 0.5438 ns 0.5086 ns 402.114 ns 401.325 ns 402.919 ns 0.91 0.00 - NA

MeasureReverseEndianness Job-KKCPCD /runtime/artifacts/bin/testhost/net7.0-Linux-Release-x64/shared/Microsoft.NETCore.App/7.0.0/corerun 441.049 ns 2.4377 ns 2.2803 ns 440.656 ns 438.690 ns 445.914 ns 1.00 0.00 - NA

MeasureReverseUsingNtoH Job-FQAXKT /runtime.fixed/artifacts/bin/testhost/net7.0-Linux-Release-x64/shared/Microsoft.NETCore.App/7.0.0/corerun 421.494 ns 1.1445 ns 0.9557 ns 421.163 ns 420.339 ns 423.134 ns 1.01 0.03 - NA

MeasureReverseUsingNtoH Job-KKCPCD /runtime/artifacts/bin/testhost/net7.0-Linux-Release-x64/shared/Microsoft.NETCore.App/7.0.0/corerun 423.682 ns 9.7031 ns 11.1741 ns 428.362 ns 407.732 ns 437.481 ns 1.00 0.00 - NA

Also see here the difference between a >= b and a > b - 1 in jit asm.

Mainly this diff:

// a >= b case L0012: cmp esi, eax L0014: setge cl // a > b - 1 case L0012: dec eax L0013: cmp esi, eax L0015: setg cl

Now the questions are

Should I open another PR with quickfix, or how is it supposed to be done?

Maybe I should investigate why it's faster, is it so on most platforms? And try to put that as optimization into jit. Or is it too minor/unreliable/inconsistent throughout platforms/etc?

Should I open another PR with quickfix, or how is it supposed to be done?

Yes, open a new PR.

Maybe I should investigate why it's faster, is it so on most platforms? And try to put that as optimization into jit. Or is it too minor/unreliable/inconsistent throughout platforms/etc?

You're certainly welcome to investigate.

It can be tricky to root cause these. I would hazard a guess the perf issue is not directly related to the change above but some other microarchitectural issue (say branch alignment). Though given that we're also seeing impact on arm64 perhaps it is something directly related after all.

dakersnar · 2022-04-27T20:33:52Z

Sounds like this is already being addressed, but here are some arm64 regressions from this change: dotnet/perf-autofiling-issues#4727

AndyAyersMS · 2022-04-27T22:55:30Z

Also regressions from alpine x64: dotnet/perf-autofiling-issues#4870

dakersnar · 2022-04-27T23:04:19Z

Another regression on Windows x86: dotnet/perf-autofiling-issues#4706

B1Z0N requested review from marek-safar and MichalStrehovsky as code owners April 7, 2022 10:44

dotnet-issue-labeler bot added the area-System.Collections label Apr 7, 2022

ghost added the community-contribution Indicates that the PR has been added by a community member label Apr 7, 2022

B1Z0N commented Apr 7, 2022

View reviewed changes

runfoapp bot mentioned this pull request Apr 7, 2022

TLS1.3 networking tests are flaky on Windows 11 #58927

Closed

B1Z0N force-pushed the main branch from 4817108 to 22b949d Compare April 7, 2022 20:07

danmoseley reviewed Apr 7, 2022

View reviewed changes

src/libraries/System.Collections/src/Resources/Strings.resx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

B1Z0N closed this Apr 8, 2022

B1Z0N force-pushed the main branch from 22b949d to c79c8e1 Compare April 8, 2022 07:54

B1Z0N reopened this Apr 8, 2022

runfoapp bot mentioned this pull request Apr 8, 2022

Test clientandserver_oneorbothusedefault_ok failing in recent builds #67712

Closed

B1Z0N force-pushed the main branch from d710491 to 3e79777 Compare April 8, 2022 18:23

B1Z0N mentioned this pull request Apr 8, 2022

Wrong exception message on indexing collections. dotnet/dotnet-api-docs#7937

Open

B1Z0N force-pushed the main branch from 3e79777 to 595a5d7 Compare April 8, 2022 18:50

Fixed error messages regarding collection indexing.

03c35a2

Separated "Must be less than the size" and "Must be less than or equal to the size" error messages. Now first one goes in "throw on index >= size case" and the second goes in "throw on index > size". Fix dotnet#67423

B1Z0N force-pushed the main branch from 595a5d7 to 03c35a2 Compare April 8, 2022 20:41

B1Z0N requested a review from danmoseley April 9, 2022 07:46

danmoseley reviewed Apr 12, 2022

View reviewed changes

src/libraries/System.Private.CoreLib/src/System/Globalization/CompareInfo.cs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

danmoseley reviewed Apr 12, 2022

View reviewed changes

src/libraries/System.Private.CoreLib/src/System/Globalization/CompareInfo.cs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

danmoseley reviewed Apr 12, 2022

View reviewed changes

src/libraries/System.Private.CoreLib/src/System/Text/StringBuilder.cs Show resolved Hide resolved

B1Z0N and others added 2 commits April 12, 2022 19:51

Update src/libraries/System.Private.CoreLib/src/System/Globalization/…

4b175a7

…CompareInfo.cs Co-authored-by: Dan Moseley <danmose@microsoft.com>

Update src/libraries/System.Private.CoreLib/src/System/Globalization/…

63958cc

…CompareInfo.cs Co-authored-by: Dan Moseley <danmose@microsoft.com>

danmoseley approved these changes Apr 12, 2022

View reviewed changes

danmoseley merged commit a9b3898 into dotnet:main Apr 13, 2022

AndyAyersMS mentioned this pull request Apr 22, 2022

[Perf] Changes at 4/13/2022 4:27:35 PM dotnet/perf-autofiling-issues#4738

Closed

B1Z0N commented Apr 25, 2022

View reviewed changes

B1Z0N mentioned this pull request Apr 28, 2022

Switched to "index < length - 1" in BitConverter.ToBoolean for performance reasons #68636

Closed

ghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators May 28, 2022

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Fixed error messages on collections indexing #67696

Fixed error messages on collections indexing #67696

B1Z0N commented Apr 7, 2022 •

edited

Loading

ghost commented Apr 7, 2022

About

Other

`ThrowHelper`

Docs

B1Z0N Apr 7, 2022

B1Z0N commented Apr 7, 2022

azure-pipelines bot commented Apr 7, 2022

danmoseley commented Apr 7, 2022

azure-pipelines bot commented Apr 7, 2022

danmoseley commented Apr 7, 2022

B1Z0N commented Apr 7, 2022 •

edited

Loading

danmoseley commented Apr 7, 2022

B1Z0N commented Apr 11, 2022

danmoseley Apr 12, 2022

danmoseley Apr 12, 2022

marek-safar commented Apr 12, 2022

danmoseley commented Apr 12, 2022

danmoseley commented Apr 12, 2022

danmoseley left a comment

B1Z0N commented Apr 13, 2022

danmoseley commented Apr 13, 2022

B1Z0N commented Apr 13, 2022

danmoseley commented Apr 13, 2022

AndyAyersMS commented Apr 22, 2022

B1Z0N Apr 25, 2022

AndyAyersMS Apr 27, 2022

dakersnar commented Apr 27, 2022 •

edited

Loading

AndyAyersMS commented Apr 27, 2022

dakersnar commented Apr 27, 2022

Method	Job	Toolchain	Mean	Error	StdDev	Median	Min	Max	Ratio	RatioSD	Allocated	Alloc Ratio
ReadStructAndReverseBE	Job-FQAXKT	/runtime.fixed/artifacts/bin/testhost/net7.0-Linux-Release-x64/shared/Microsoft.NETCore.App/7.0.0/corerun	11.345 ns	0.1365 ns	0.1277 ns	11.394 ns	11.116 ns	11.477 ns	0.98	0.01	-	NA
ReadStructAndReverseBE	Job-KKCPCD	/runtime/artifacts/bin/testhost/net7.0-Linux-Release-x64/shared/Microsoft.NETCore.App/7.0.0/corerun	11.566 ns	0.0608 ns	0.0539 ns	11.568 ns	11.472 ns	11.660 ns	1.00	0.00	-	NA

ReadStructAndReverseLE	Job-FQAXKT	/runtime.fixed/artifacts/bin/testhost/net7.0-Linux-Release-x64/shared/Microsoft.NETCore.App/7.0.0/corerun	1.992 ns	0.0726 ns	0.0679 ns	1.981 ns	1.831 ns	2.133 ns	1.01	0.03	-	NA
ReadStructAndReverseLE	Job-KKCPCD	/runtime/artifacts/bin/testhost/net7.0-Linux-Release-x64/shared/Microsoft.NETCore.App/7.0.0/corerun	1.983 ns	0.0088 ns	0.0078 ns	1.984 ns	1.962 ns	1.994 ns	1.00	0.00	-	NA

ReadStructFieldByFieldBE	Job-FQAXKT	/runtime.fixed/artifacts/bin/testhost/net7.0-Linux-Release-x64/shared/Microsoft.NETCore.App/7.0.0/corerun	10.517 ns	0.5510 ns	0.5896 ns	10.242 ns	9.892 ns	12.019 ns	1.00	0.07	-	NA
ReadStructFieldByFieldBE	Job-KKCPCD	/runtime/artifacts/bin/testhost/net7.0-Linux-Release-x64/shared/Microsoft.NETCore.App/7.0.0/corerun	10.478 ns	0.4902 ns	0.5645 ns	10.132 ns	9.623 ns	11.228 ns	1.00	0.00	-	NA

ReadStructFieldByFieldLE	Job-FQAXKT	/runtime.fixed/artifacts/bin/testhost/net7.0-Linux-Release-x64/shared/Microsoft.NETCore.App/7.0.0/corerun	9.229 ns	0.0381 ns	0.0337 ns	9.227 ns	9.180 ns	9.296 ns	1.01	0.00	-	NA
ReadStructFieldByFieldLE	Job-KKCPCD	/runtime/artifacts/bin/testhost/net7.0-Linux-Release-x64/shared/Microsoft.NETCore.App/7.0.0/corerun	9.139 ns	0.0066 ns	0.0055 ns	9.136 ns	9.133 ns	9.153 ns	1.00	0.00	-	NA

ReadStructFieldByFieldUsingBitConverterLE	Job-FQAXKT	/runtime.fixed/artifacts/bin/testhost/net7.0-Linux-Release-x64/shared/Microsoft.NETCore.App/7.0.0/corerun	19.257 ns	0.1194 ns	0.0997 ns	19.255 ns	19.008 ns	19.404 ns	0.90	0.01	-	NA
ReadStructFieldByFieldUsingBitConverterLE	Job-KKCPCD	/runtime/artifacts/bin/testhost/net7.0-Linux-Release-x64/shared/Microsoft.NETCore.App/7.0.0/corerun	21.446 ns	0.1205 ns	0.1127 ns	21.434 ns	21.258 ns	21.603 ns	1.00	0.00	-	NA

ReadStructFieldByFieldUsingBitConverterBE	Job-FQAXKT	/runtime.fixed/artifacts/bin/testhost/net7.0-Linux-Release-x64/shared/Microsoft.NETCore.App/7.0.0/corerun	30.687 ns	0.0825 ns	0.0732 ns	30.695 ns	30.544 ns	30.804 ns	0.98	0.00	-	NA
ReadStructFieldByFieldUsingBitConverterBE	Job-KKCPCD	/runtime/artifacts/bin/testhost/net7.0-Linux-Release-x64/shared/Microsoft.NETCore.App/7.0.0/corerun	31.372 ns	0.1749 ns	0.1636 ns	31.297 ns	31.221 ns	31.792 ns	1.00	0.00	-	NA

MeasureReverseEndianness	Job-FQAXKT	/runtime.fixed/artifacts/bin/testhost/net7.0-Linux-Release-x64/shared/Microsoft.NETCore.App/7.0.0/corerun	402.172 ns	0.5438 ns	0.5086 ns	402.114 ns	401.325 ns	402.919 ns	0.91	0.00	-	NA
MeasureReverseEndianness	Job-KKCPCD	/runtime/artifacts/bin/testhost/net7.0-Linux-Release-x64/shared/Microsoft.NETCore.App/7.0.0/corerun	441.049 ns	2.4377 ns	2.2803 ns	440.656 ns	438.690 ns	445.914 ns	1.00	0.00	-	NA

MeasureReverseUsingNtoH	Job-FQAXKT	/runtime.fixed/artifacts/bin/testhost/net7.0-Linux-Release-x64/shared/Microsoft.NETCore.App/7.0.0/corerun	421.494 ns	1.1445 ns	0.9557 ns	421.163 ns	420.339 ns	423.134 ns	1.01	0.03	-	NA
MeasureReverseUsingNtoH	Job-KKCPCD	/runtime/artifacts/bin/testhost/net7.0-Linux-Release-x64/shared/Microsoft.NETCore.App/7.0.0/corerun	423.682 ns	9.7031 ns	11.1741 ns	428.362 ns	407.732 ns	437.481 ns	1.00	0.00	-	NA

Fixed error messages on collections indexing #67696

Fixed error messages on collections indexing #67696

Conversation

B1Z0N commented Apr 7, 2022 • edited Loading

About

Other

ThrowHelper

Docs

ghost commented Apr 7, 2022

About

Other

ThrowHelper

Docs

B1Z0N Apr 7, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

B1Z0N commented Apr 7, 2022

azure-pipelines bot commented Apr 7, 2022

danmoseley commented Apr 7, 2022

azure-pipelines bot commented Apr 7, 2022

danmoseley commented Apr 7, 2022

B1Z0N commented Apr 7, 2022 • edited Loading

danmoseley commented Apr 7, 2022

B1Z0N commented Apr 11, 2022

danmoseley Apr 12, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

danmoseley Apr 12, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

marek-safar commented Apr 12, 2022

danmoseley commented Apr 12, 2022

danmoseley commented Apr 12, 2022

danmoseley left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

B1Z0N commented Apr 13, 2022

danmoseley commented Apr 13, 2022

B1Z0N commented Apr 13, 2022

danmoseley commented Apr 13, 2022

AndyAyersMS commented Apr 22, 2022

B1Z0N Apr 25, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

AndyAyersMS Apr 27, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

dakersnar commented Apr 27, 2022 • edited Loading

AndyAyersMS commented Apr 27, 2022

dakersnar commented Apr 27, 2022

B1Z0N commented Apr 7, 2022 •

edited

Loading

`ThrowHelper`

`ThrowHelper`

B1Z0N commented Apr 7, 2022 •

edited

Loading

dakersnar commented Apr 27, 2022 •

edited

Loading