Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for LLVM 14.x #68719

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Apr 30, 2022
Merged

Add support for LLVM 14.x #68719

merged 4 commits into from
Apr 30, 2022

Conversation

vargaz
Copy link
Contributor

@vargaz vargaz commented Apr 29, 2022

No description provided.

@ghost ghost assigned vargaz Apr 29, 2022
@vargaz vargaz requested review from fanyang-mono and lateralusX and removed request for SamMonoRT April 29, 2022 19:52
LLVMValueRef dst_vec = LLVMBuildBitCast (builder, dst_ptr, LLVMPointerType (type_to_sse_type (ins->inst_c1), 0), "");
values [ins->dreg] = mono_llvm_build_aligned_load (builder, dst_vec, "", FALSE, ins->inst_c0); // inst_c0 is alignment
LLVMTypeRef etype = type_to_sse_type (ins->inst_c1);
LLVMValueRef dst_vec = LLVMBuildBitCast (builder, dst_ptr, LLVMPointerType (etype, 0), "");
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

one of the motivations for opaque pointer types in the LLVM docs is that it allows them to get rid of a lot of pointer-to-pointer bitcasts that are just changing the element type.

I'm guessing they probably have a pass that will remove these pretty early on.

Do you think we should try to avoid emitting them at all?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We are still using the non-opaque mode since the opaque mode is experimental afaik in llvm 11.x. So we can remove those after switching to llvm 14.x.

@vargaz
Copy link
Contributor Author

vargaz commented Apr 29, 2022

/azp run runtime-wasm

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@vargaz vargaz merged commit e938e44 into dotnet:main Apr 30, 2022
@vargaz vargaz deleted the llvm14 branch April 30, 2022 16:06
@ghost ghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators May 30, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants