JIT: Stop specifying general JitStress in OSR/largefuncletframe #86380
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Otherwise new stress modes can change what the test is testing. I verified that these stress modes reproduced the original issue back when the test was introduced. Fix dotnet#86185
dotnet-issue-labeler
bot
added
the
area-CodeGen-coreclr
ghost
assigned 
|
Tagging subscribers to this area: @JulieLeeMSFT, @jakobbotsch Issue DetailsOtherwise new stress modes can change what the test is testing. I verified that these stress modes reproduced the original issue back when the test was introduced. Fix #86185
|
|
cc @dotnet/jit-contrib PTAL @AndyAyersMS |
AndyAyersMS
approved these changes
May 17, 2023
|
Failures are known according to build analysis. |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Otherwise new stress modes can change what the test is testing. I verified that these stress modes reproduced the original issue back when the test was introduced.
Fix #86185