Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[manual] Merge release/7.0-staging into release/7.0 #93582

Merged
merged 20 commits into from
Oct 17, 2023

Conversation

carlossanlop
Copy link
Member

Merge commit.

elinor-fung and others added 20 commits September 18, 2023 09:35
…dotnet#92033)

This adds a check for the framework's .deps.json instead of just the existence of the directory. To avoid extra file checks in the normal/happy path (where all framework version folder are valid), when resolving, it only does the check after resolving the best version match. And if that version directory isn't valid, it tries resolving again without it.

Backport of dotnet#90035
* Fix JsonDocument thread safety.

Co-authored-by: stoub@microsoft.com

* Update ServicingVersion

---------

Co-authored-by: Eirik Tsarpalis <eirik.tsarpalis@gmail.com>
…/7.0-to-release/7.0-staging

[automated] Merge branch 'release/7.0' => 'release/7.0-staging'
…04.1 (dotnet#92991)

Microsoft.NET.Workload.Emscripten.net6.Manifest-7.0.100 , Microsoft.NET.Workload.Emscripten.net7.Manifest-7.0.100
 From Version 7.0.12 -> To Version 7.0.13

Co-authored-by: dotnet-maestro[bot] <dotnet-maestro[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
…#93006)

Backport of dotnet#75088 to release/7.0-staging

Fixes dotnet#81211 

## Customer Impact

Customers targeting Apple platforms using LLVM AOT codegen (the default) in highly concurrent settings (such as firing off multiple simultaneous async HTTP requests) may experience unexpected behavior such as InvalidCastExceptions, NullReferenceExceptions or crashes.

## Testing

Manual testing

## Risk

Low.  This code has been running on .NET 8 `main` for over a year in CI, as well as on some other non-mobile platforms

---

* [Mono] Race in init_method when using LLVM AOT.

When using LLVM AOT codegen, init_method updates two GOT slots.
These slots are initialized as part of init_method,
but there is a race between initialization of the two slots. Current
implementation can have two threads running init_method for the same
method, but as soon as:

[got_slots [pindex]] = addr

store is visible, it will trigger other threads to return back from
init_method, but since that could happen before the corresponding
LLVM AOT const slot is set, second thread will return to method
calling init_method, load the LLVM aot const, and crash when
trying to use it (since its still NULL).

This crash is very rare but have been identified on x86/x64 CPU's,
when one thread is either preempted between updating regular GOT slot
and LLVM GOT slot or store into LLVM GOT slot gets delayed in
store buffer. I have also been able to emulate the scenario in debugger,
triggering the issue and crashing in the method loading from LLVM aot
const slot.

Fix change order of updates and make sure the update of LLVM aot const
slot happens before memory_barrier, since:

got [got_slots [pindex]] = addr;

have release semantics in relation to addr and update of LLVM aot const
slot. Fix also add acquire/release semantics for ji->type in init_method
since it is used to guard if a thread ignores a patch or not and it
should not be re-ordered with previous stores, since it can cause
similar race conditions with updated slots.

* Move register_jump_target_got_slot above mono_memory_barrier.

* revert unintentional branding change

---------

Co-authored-by: vseanreesermsft <78103370+vseanreesermsft@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: lateralusX <lateralusx.github@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Aleksey Kliger <alklig@microsoft.com>
… using an array of structs of types that use old-style managed marshalers (dotnet#93148)

Co-authored-by: Jeremy Koritzinsky <jekoritz@microsoft.com>
- Added two config options, one that configures the worker and wait thread timeouts, and another that enables keeping some number of worker threads alive after they are created
- This enables services that take periodic traffic to keep some worker threads around for better latency, while allowing extra threads to time out as appropriate for the service
When the new stub heaps were implemented, the chunk size needed to be
limited so that all precodes for a chunk fit into a single memory page.
That was done in `MethodDescChunk::CreateChunk`. But it was discovered
now that there is another place where it needs to be limited, the
`MethodTableBuilder::AllocAndInitMethodDescChunk`. The
JIT\opt\ObjectStackAllocation\ObjectStackAllocationTests started to fail
in the outerloop due to too long chunk. The failure happens in crossgen2
as it is using a separate build of runtime in release and only that
uncovers the problem. And only when DOTNET_TieredCompilation=0 and
DOTNET_ProfApi_RejitOnAttach=0.

This change fixes the problem. With this change applied to the dotnet
runtime version used by the crossgen2 and patching it in place in the
.dotnet/shared/.... directory, the issue doesn't occur.

Close dotnet#81103

Co-authored-by: Jan Vorlicek <janvorli@microsoft.com>
…/7.0-to-release/7.0-staging

[automated] Merge branch 'release/7.0' => 'release/7.0-staging'
…30905.3 (dotnet#93392)

Microsoft.DotNet.XHarness.CLI , Microsoft.DotNet.XHarness.TestRunners.Common , Microsoft.DotNet.XHarness.TestRunners.Xunit
 From Version 7.0.0-prerelease.23407.3 -> To Version 7.0.0-prerelease.23455.3

Co-authored-by: dotnet-maestro[bot] <dotnet-maestro[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Jan Kotas <jkotas@microsoft.com>
…kernel. (dotnet#93505)

Co-authored-by: Tom Deseyn <tom.deseyn@gmail.com>
…cu dotnet/emsdk (dotnet#93390)

* Update dependencies from https://github.com/dotnet/arcade build 20231011.9

Microsoft.DotNet.ApiCompat , Microsoft.DotNet.Arcade.Sdk , Microsoft.DotNet.Build.Tasks.Archives , Microsoft.DotNet.Build.Tasks.Feed , Microsoft.DotNet.Build.Tasks.Installers , Microsoft.DotNet.Build.Tasks.Packaging , Microsoft.DotNet.Build.Tasks.TargetFramework , Microsoft.DotNet.Build.Tasks.Templating , Microsoft.DotNet.Build.Tasks.Workloads , Microsoft.DotNet.CodeAnalysis , Microsoft.DotNet.GenAPI , Microsoft.DotNet.GenFacades , Microsoft.DotNet.Helix.Sdk , Microsoft.DotNet.PackageTesting , Microsoft.DotNet.RemoteExecutor , Microsoft.DotNet.SharedFramework.Sdk , Microsoft.DotNet.VersionTools.Tasks , Microsoft.DotNet.XUnitConsoleRunner , Microsoft.DotNet.XUnitExtensions
 From Version 7.0.0-beta.23408.3 -> To Version 7.0.0-beta.23511.9

* Update dependencies from https://github.com/dotnet/icu build 20231012.1

Microsoft.NETCore.Runtime.ICU.Transport
 From Version 7.0.0-rtm.23409.2 -> To Version 7.0.0-rtm.23512.1

* Update dependencies from https://github.com/dotnet/emsdk build 20231012.1

Microsoft.NET.Workload.Emscripten.net6.Manifest-7.0.100 , Microsoft.NET.Workload.Emscripten.net7.Manifest-7.0.100
 From Version 7.0.13 -> To Version 7.0.13

---------

Co-authored-by: dotnet-maestro[bot] <dotnet-maestro[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Carlos Sánchez López <1175054+carlossanlop@users.noreply.github.com>
…efault path (dotnet#92955)

* Fixing https://github.com/dotnet/aspnetcore/issues/51093

* Addressing comments

* Addressing comments

* Addressing comments
…ocess. (dotnet#85649) (dotnet#93572)

* ProcessTests: allow WorkingSet to be zero just after launching the process.

The WorkingSet tests fail on Fedora 38+ because a zero working set value
is observed just after the process start.

Co-authored-by: Tom Deseyn <tom.deseyn@gmail.com>
@carlossanlop carlossanlop added the area-codeflow for labeling automated codeflow label Oct 17, 2023
@carlossanlop carlossanlop added this to the 7.0.x milestone Oct 17, 2023
@carlossanlop carlossanlop self-assigned this Oct 17, 2023
@carlossanlop carlossanlop merged commit bad10ca into dotnet:release/7.0 Oct 17, 2023
256 of 277 checks passed
@carlossanlop carlossanlop deleted the release/7.0-staging branch October 17, 2023 04:32
@ghost ghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 16, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
area-codeflow for labeling automated codeflow Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants