Add correct ImplementingType and InterfaceImpl to DIM cache in TypeMapInfo #98513
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ghost
assigned 
dotnet-issue-labeler
bot
added
the
area-Tools-ILLink
|
Tagging subscribers to this area: @agocke, @sbomer, @vitek-karas Issue DetailsFrom #98436 (comment) We don't add the correct Working on a test case that fails without this change.
|
This was referenced Feb 16, 2024
jtschuster
changed the title
sbomer
approved these changes
Feb 21, 2024
sbomer
reviewed
Feb 21, 2024
sbomer
reviewed
Feb 21, 2024
|
Failures are known |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
From #98436 (comment)
We don't add the correct
ImplementingTypeto the DIM's cache. Instead we can pass the correct implementing type toFindAndAddDefaultInterfaceImplementations. This worked fine for assemblies compiled by Roslyn because it adds an InterfaceImpl for all transitive interfaces, but IL doesn't require that.Test cases for this require types that don't have interfaceimpls for all their interfaces directly on their type, but that also fails for another reason: #98536. Test cases in #98540 should cover both issues.