-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 269
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: Remove package-lock.json and add CI checks #394
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The PR diff size of 25776 lines exceeds the maximum allowed for the inline comments feature.
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 1448
💛 - Coveralls |
Looks good. I'd add a gitignore just to be safe. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The PR diff size of 25779 lines exceeds the maximum allowed for the inline comments feature.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The PR diff size of 25779 lines exceeds the maximum allowed for the inline comments feature.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The PR diff size of 25779 lines exceeds the maximum allowed for the inline comments feature.
Code Climate has analyzed commit d203bf3 and detected 0 issues on this pull request. View more on Code Climate. |
@mrchief added |
🎉 This PR is included in version 2.3.5 🎉 The release is available on: Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀 |
- add test to check that it does not enter again
What does it do?
This removes the
package-lock.json
file, and adds a test to check for this:package-lock.json
does not existyarn.lock
existsFixes # (issue)
There is no GitHub issue yet, but the latest release brought up this issue for us:
#389 (comment)
Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
Checklist: