Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Backport] Backport JFR Streaming API to Dragonwell 8 #41

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Jul 31, 2020
Merged

[Backport] Backport JFR Streaming API to Dragonwell 8 #41

merged 10 commits into from
Jul 31, 2020

Conversation

D-D-H
Copy link
Contributor

@D-D-H D-D-H commented Jul 24, 2020

@D-D-H D-D-H requested review from kuaiwei, sanhong and yuleil July 24, 2020 08:51
src/share/vm/jfr/jni/jfrJavaSupport.cpp Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/share/vm/jfr/jni/jfrJavaSupport.cpp Show resolved Hide resolved
src/share/vm/jfr/jni/jfrJavaSupport.cpp Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/share/vm/jfr/jni/jfrJavaSupport.cpp Show resolved Hide resolved
src/share/vm/jfr/jni/jfrJavaSupport.cpp Show resolved Hide resolved
src/share/vm/jfr/jni/jfrJavaSupport.cpp Show resolved Hide resolved
src/share/vm/jfr/jni/jfrJavaSupport.cpp Show resolved Hide resolved
@@ -303,6 +310,10 @@ JVM_ENTRY_NO_ENV(jboolean, jfr_event_writer_flush(JNIEnv* env, jclass cls, jobje
return JfrJavaEventWriter::flush(writer, used_size, requested_size, thread);
JVM_END

JVM_ENTRY_NO_ENV(void, jfr_flush(JNIEnv* env, jobject jvm))
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm wondering why jfr entry always has a jvm argument and not use it.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

it isn't a static method and the argument 'jvm' is the receiver

D-D-H added 10 commits July 31, 2020 10:34
…f checkpoint data

Summary:

Test Plan: jdk/jfr

Reviewed-by: yuleil

Issue: dragonwell-project/dragonwell8#112
Summary:

Test Plan: jdk/jfr

Reviewed-by: yuleil

Issue: dragonwell-project/dragonwell8#112
Summary:

Test Plan: jdk/jfr

Reviewed-by: yuleil

Issue: dragonwell-project/dragonwell8#112
…ssertion failure

Summary:

Test Plan: jdk/jfr

Reviewed-by: yuleil

Issue: dragonwell-project/dragonwell8#112
…hread JFR Event Stream"

Summary:

Test Plan: jdk/jfr

Reviewed-by: yuleil

Issue: dragonwell-project/dragonwell8#112
@D-D-H D-D-H merged commit 6122650 into dragonwell-project:master Jul 31, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants