This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 17, 2019. It is now read-only.
Add support reply_to parameter(from Django 1.8) #114
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Thanks for the PR, I am on holiday break right now, but I'll be able to take a look at this later next week. |
Someguy123
added a commit
to Privex/django-mail-queue
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 5, 2018
Merge pull request dstegelman#114 from kostyaeremin/master
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What's this Pull Request do?
Fix issue with empty reply_to.
What has been changed?
Any background context you want to provide?
From Django 1.8, EmailMessage and EmailMultiAlternatives now support the reply_to parameter.
Release notes
So that, if you need to add reply_to, you should use reply_to field of EmailMultiAlternatives when you send email.
GitHub issues
https://github.com/dstegelman/django-mail-queue/issues/113