Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

💥 Drop deprecated unicode* #5315

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 6, 2024
Merged

💥 Drop deprecated unicode* #5315

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 6, 2024

Conversation

dubzzz
Copy link
Owner

@dubzzz dubzzz commented Oct 6, 2024

Description

The arbitraries unicode and unicodeString have been marked for deprecation since version 3.22.0.

They are now being fully dropped.

If you still want to rely on something behaving this way we recommend you to use the following constructs:

const gapSize = 0xdfff + 1 - 0xd800;
function unicodeMapper(v: number) {
  if (v < 0xd800) return v;
  return v + gapSize;
}
function unicodeUnmapper(v: number) {
  if (v < 0xd800) return v;
  if (v <= 0xdfff) return -1;
  return v - gapSize;
}
function unicode(): Arbitrary<string> {
  return integer({min :0, max: 0xffff - gapSize}).map(
    v => String.fromCodePoint(unicodeMapper(v)),
    s => {
      if (typeof s !== 'string') throw new Error('Invalid');
      if (s.length !== 1) throw new Error('Invalid');
      return unicodeUnmapper(s.codePointAt(0))
    }
  );
}
const unicodeString = (constraints) => fc.string({ ...constraints, unit: unicode() });

We recommend checking for the unit constraint offered built-in on string arbitraries rather than going for a fully aligned custom unicode. Most of the time, if you wanted unicode characters you probably wanted either grapheme or binary.

ChecklistDon't delete this checklist and make sure you do the following before opening the PR

  • The name of my PR follows gitmoji specification
  • My PR references one of several related issues (if any)
    • New features or breaking changes must come with an associated Issue or Discussion
    • My PR does not add any new dependency without an associated Issue or Discussion
  • My PR includes bumps details, please run yarn bump and flag the impacts properly
  • My PR adds relevant tests and they would have failed without my PR (when applicable)

Advanced

  • Category: 💥 Breaking change
  • Impacts: Dropped arbitraries

The arbitraries `unicode` and `unicodeString` have been marked for deprecation since version 3.22.0.

They are now being fully dropped.

If you still want to rely on something behaving this way we recommend you to use the following constructs:

```ts
const gapSize = 0xdfff + 1 - 0xd800;
function unicodeMapper(v: number) {
  if (v < 0xd800) return v;
  return v + gapSize;
}
function unicodeUnmapper(v: number) {
  if (v < 0xd800) return v;
  if (v <= 0xdfff) return -1;
  return v - gapSize;
}
function unicode(): Arbitrary<string> {
  return integer({min :0, max: 0xffff - gapSize}).map(
    v => String.fromCodePoint(unicodeMapper(v)),
    s => {
      if (typeof s !== 'string') throw new Error('Invalid');
      if (s.length !== 1) throw new Error('Invalid');
      return unicodeUnmapper(s.codePointAt(0))
    }
  );
}
const unicodeString = (constraints) => fc.string({ ...constraints, unit: unicode() });
```

We recommend checking for the `unit` constraint offered built-in on `string` arbitraries rather than going for a fully aligned custom `unicode`. Most of the time, if you wanted unicode characters you probably wanted either `grapheme` or `binary`.
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Oct 6, 2024

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 48ed1ba

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@dubzzz dubzzz enabled auto-merge (squash) October 6, 2024 16:23
Copy link

codesandbox-ci bot commented Oct 6, 2024

This pull request is automatically built and testable in CodeSandbox.

To see build info of the built libraries, click here or the icon next to each commit SHA.

Latest deployment of this branch, based on commit 48ed1ba:

Sandbox Source
@fast-check/examples Configuration

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 6, 2024

👋 A preview of the new documentation is available at: http://6702ba35b153107c693f5dbe--dubzzz-fast-check.netlify.app

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 6, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 94.90%. Comparing base (c5e5ddd) to head (48ed1ba).
Report is 1 commits behind head on next-3_22_0.

Additional details and impacted files
@@               Coverage Diff               @@
##           next-3_22_0    #5315      +/-   ##
===============================================
- Coverage        95.02%   94.90%   -0.12%     
===============================================
  Files              219      217       -2     
  Lines            10030     9999      -31     
  Branches          2629     2617      -12     
===============================================
- Hits              9531     9490      -41     
- Misses             499      509      +10     
Flag Coverage Δ
unit-tests 94.90% <ø> (-0.12%) ⬇️
unit-tests-18.x-Linux 94.90% <ø> (-0.12%) ⬇️
unit-tests-20.x-Linux 94.90% <ø> (-0.12%) ⬇️
unit-tests-22.x-Linux 94.90% <ø> (-0.12%) ⬇️
unit-tests-latest-Linux 94.90% <ø> (-0.12%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@dubzzz dubzzz merged commit 66cc03a into next-3_22_0 Oct 6, 2024
53 of 54 checks passed
@dubzzz dubzzz deleted the drop-uni branch October 6, 2024 16:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant