Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

👷(packaged) Move to Vitest #5348

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Oct 21, 2024
Merged

👷(packaged) Move to Vitest #5348

merged 4 commits into from
Oct 21, 2024

Conversation

dubzzz
Copy link
Owner

@dubzzz dubzzz commented Oct 21, 2024

Description

Change our test runner to Vitest.

Jest is great but it's partial support for ESM is putting us in troubles. As such we passed fast-check to Vitest a while ago and want to unify all others so that we preserve a unique test runner in our CI.

ChecklistDon't delete this checklist and make sure you do the following before opening the PR

  • The name of my PR follows gitmoji specification
  • My PR references one of several related issues (if any)
    • New features or breaking changes must come with an associated Issue or Discussion
    • My PR does not add any new dependency without an associated Issue or Discussion
  • My PR includes bumps details, please run yarn bump and flag the impacts properly
  • My PR adds relevant tests and they would have failed without my PR (when applicable)

Advanced

  • Category: 👷 Build tools & CI
  • Impacts: Test runner

Change our test runner to Vitest.

Jest is great but it's partial support for ESM is putting us in troubles. As such we passed fast-check to Vitest a while ago and want to unify all others so that we preserve a unique test runner in our CI.
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Oct 21, 2024

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 85d5336

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 1 package
Name Type
@fast-check/packaged Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

Copy link

codesandbox-ci bot commented Oct 21, 2024

This pull request is automatically built and testable in CodeSandbox.

To see build info of the built libraries, click here or the icon next to each commit SHA.

Latest deployment of this branch, based on commit 85d5336:

Sandbox Source
@fast-check/examples Configuration

Copy link
Contributor

👋 A preview of the new documentation is available at: http://671699b45ba08c8616ecb159--dubzzz-fast-check.netlify.app

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 21, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 95.29%. Comparing base (331814a) to head (85d5336).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #5348   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   95.29%   95.29%           
=======================================
  Files         234      234           
  Lines       10433    10433           
  Branches     2777     2777           
=======================================
  Hits         9942     9942           
  Misses        491      491           
Flag Coverage Δ
unit-tests 95.29% <ø> (ø)
unit-tests-18.x-Linux 95.29% <ø> (ø)
unit-tests-20.x-Linux 95.29% <ø> (ø)
unit-tests-22.x-Linux 95.29% <ø> (ø)
unit-tests-latest-Linux 95.29% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@dubzzz dubzzz enabled auto-merge (squash) October 21, 2024 18:24
Copy link
Contributor

👋 A preview of the new documentation is available at: http://67169e128771da9fcb505bd0--dubzzz-fast-check.netlify.app

@dubzzz dubzzz merged commit f1b49e0 into main Oct 21, 2024
56 checks passed
@dubzzz dubzzz deleted the to-vitest-in-packaged branch October 21, 2024 18:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant