Bump coverage from 7.6.4 to 7.6.8

[dependabot]

Bumps coverage from 7.6.4 to 7.6.8.

Changelog

Sourced from coverage's changelog.

Version 7.6.8 — 2024-11-23

• Fix: the LCOV report code assumed that a branch line that took no branches meant that the entire line was unexecuted. This isn't true in a few cases: the line might always raise an exception, or might have been optimized away. Fixes issue 1896_.

• Fix: similarly, the HTML report will now explain that a line that jumps to none of its expected destinations must have always raised an exception. Previously, it would say something nonsensical like, "line 4 didn't jump to line 5 because line 4 was never true, and it didn't jump to line 7 because line 4 was always true." This was also shown in issue 1896_.

.. _issue 1896: nedbat/coveragepy#1896

.. _changes_7-6-7:

Version 7.6.7 — 2024-11-15

• Fix: ugh, the other assert from 7.6.5 can also be encountered in the wild, so it's been restored to a conditional. Sorry for the churn.

.. _changes_7-6-6:

Version 7.6.6 — 2024-11-15

• One of the new asserts from 7.6.5 caused problems in real projects, as reported in issue 1891_. The assert has been removed.

.. _issue 1891: nedbat/coveragepy#1891

.. _changes_7-6-5:

Version 7.6.5 — 2024-11-14

• Fix: fine-tuned the exact Python version (3.12.6) when exiting from with statements changed how they traced. This affected whether people saw the fix for issue 1880_.

• Fix: isolate our code more from mocking in the os module that in rare cases can cause bizarre behavior <pytest-cov-666_>_.

• Refactor: some code unreachable code paths in parser.py were changed to

... (truncated)

Commits

• 6134266 docs: sample HTML for 7.6.8
• 041f963 docs: prep for 7.6.8
• 7fe48b6 build: don't search generated report files
• f219144 docs: start changelog entries with capital letters
• d1a916a fix: a line that branches nowhere must always raise an exception
• 2ace7a2 fix: don't assume 'no branches' means 'not executed' #1896
• 3ed5915 style: all of ci should use underscores
• 0db86f2 build: automate updating readthedocs
• 2a89551 chore: make upgrade (not sure why files became absolute)
• ba9c157 chore: make doc_upgrade
• Additional commits viewable in compare view

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.

---

Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

• @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
• @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
• @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
• @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
• @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
• @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
• @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
• @dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
• @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
• @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
• @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

[github-actions]

Dependency Review

✅ No vulnerabilities or license issues or OpenSSF Scorecard issues found.

OpenSSF Scorecard

Package	Version	Score	Details
pip/coverage	7.6.8	🟢 8.5	Details Check Score Reason Security-Policy 🟢 10 security policy file detected Dangerous-Workflow 🟢 10 no dangerous workflow patterns detected Maintained 🟢 10 30 commit(s) and 24 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 Code-Review ⚠️ 0 Found 0/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 Binary-Artifacts 🟢 10 no binaries found in the repo Token-Permissions 🟢 10 GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege Pinned-Dependencies 🟢 5 dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 5 Vulnerabilities 🟢 10 0 existing vulnerabilities detected Fuzzing 🟢 10 project is fuzzed CII-Best-Practices 🟢 5 badge detected: Passing License 🟢 10 license file detected Signed-Releases ⚠️ -1 no releases found Branch-Protection ⚠️ -1 internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: githubv4.Query: Resource not accessible by integration Packaging 🟢 10 packaging workflow detected SAST 🟢 10 SAST tool is run on all commits

Scanned Files

• poetry.lock

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (fe9a308) to head (466baca).
Report is 5 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main      #773   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           75        75           
  Lines         2103      2103           
  Branches       179       179           
=========================================
  Hits          2103      2103           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.