test: Add IBC timeout test

[anhductn2001]

Description

---

Closes #569

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow-up issues.

PR review checkboxes:

I have...

• Added a relevant changelog entry to the Unreleased section in CHANGELOG.md
• Targeted PR against the correct branch
• included the correct type prefix in the PR title
• Linked to the GitHub issue with discussion and accepted design
• Targets only one GitHub issue
• Wrote unit and integration tests
• Wrote relevant migration scripts if necessary
• All CI checks have passed
• Added relevant godoc comments

SDK Checklist

• Import/Export Genesis
• Registered Invariants
• Registered Events
• Updated openapi.yaml
• No usage of go map
• No usage of time.Now()
• Used fixed point arithmetic and not float arithmetic
• Avoid panicking in Begin/End block as much as possible
• No unexpeted math Overflow
• Used sendCoin and not SendCoins
• Out-of-block compute is bounded
• No serialized ID at the end of store keys

Full security checklist here

---

For Reviewer:

• Confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
• Reviewers assigned
• Confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed

---

After reviewer approval:

• In case the PR targets the main branch, PR should not be squash merge in order to keep meaningful git history.
• In case the PR targets a release branch, PR must be rebased.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (87dd0e1) 30.71% compared to head (4ec0457) 30.71%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #574   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   30.71%   30.71%           
=======================================
  Files         166      166           
  Lines       25719    25719           
=======================================
  Hits         7900     7900           
  Misses      16552    16552           
  Partials     1267     1267           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[pgoos]

Can we run them in parallel or with the current architecture this is not possible right now?

[pgoos]

We could actually go for

- run: make e2e-test-all

[anhductn2001]

I understand your current concern regarding the issue of parallel execution. I'll create another PR to incorporate them into a feasible matrix architecture for parallel CI execution. @pgoos