Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[21751] Discard changes with big key-only payload and no key hash (backport #5262) #5274

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 2, 2024

Conversation

mergify[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@mergify mergify bot commented Sep 27, 2024

Description

We currently don't have support for key-only payloads bigger than the KEY_HASH length.
Receiving such kind of messages produces a segfault in DataReaderHistory.

This PR adds a regression test reproducing the issue, and fixes it by considering the incoming change as irrelevant.
It has been done this way so it is acknowledged in reliable topics, thus avoiding the offending data to be resent.

@Mergifyio backport 2.14.x 2.10.x

@Mergifyio backport 2.6.x

Contributor Checklist

  • Commit messages follow the project guidelines.

  • The code follows the style guidelines of this project.

  • Tests that thoroughly check the new feature have been added/Regression tests checking the bug and its fix have been added; the added tests pass locally

  • N/A: Any new/modified methods have been properly documented using Doxygen.

  • N/A: Any new configuration API has an equivalent XML API (with the corresponding XSD extension)

  • Changes are backport compatible: they do NOT break ABI nor change library core behavior.

  • Changes are API compatible.

  • N/A: New feature has been added to the versions.md file (if applicable).

  • N/A: New feature has been documented/Current behavior is correctly described in the documentation.

  • Applicable backports have been included in the description.

Reviewer Checklist

  • The PR has a milestone assigned.
  • The title and description correctly express the PR's purpose.
  • Check contributor checklist is correct.
  • If this is a critical bug fix, backports to the critical-only supported branches have been requested.
  • Check CI results: changes do not issue any warning.
  • Check CI results: failing tests are unrelated with the changes.

This is an automatic backport of pull request #5262 done by [Mergify](https://mergify.com).

* Refs #21707. Regression test.

Signed-off-by: Miguel Company <miguelcompany@eprosima.com>

* Refs #21707. Test both best_effort and reliable.

Signed-off-by: Miguel Company <miguelcompany@eprosima.com>

* Refs #21707. Fix by considering offending change as irrelevant.

Signed-off-by: Miguel Company <miguelcompany@eprosima.com>

* Refs #21707. Refactor code in MessageReceiver.

Signed-off-by: Miguel Company <miguelcompany@eprosima.com>

* Refs #21707. Avoid overriding instanceHandle.

Signed-off-by: Miguel Company <miguelcompany@eprosima.com>

* Refs #21707. Add TODO so we don't forget to correctly process key-only payloads in the future.

Signed-off-by: Miguel Company <miguelcompany@eprosima.com>

* Refs #21751. Document and improve code in `change_is_relevant_for_filter`.

Signed-off-by: Miguel Company <miguelcompany@eprosima.com>

* Refs #21751. Document else.

Signed-off-by: Miguel Company <miguelcompany@eprosima.com>

* Refs #21751. Added static assertions for structure sizes.

Signed-off-by: Miguel Company <miguelcompany@eprosima.com>

---------

Signed-off-by: Miguel Company <miguelcompany@eprosima.com>
(cherry picked from commit 175add5)
@MiguelCompany MiguelCompany self-requested a review September 27, 2024 08:24
@github-actions github-actions bot added the ci-pending PR which CI is running label Sep 27, 2024
@MiguelCompany MiguelCompany added this to the v2.14.4 milestone Sep 27, 2024
Signed-off-by: Miguel Company <miguelcompany@eprosima.com>
@MiguelCompany MiguelCompany requested review from MiguelCompany and removed request for MiguelCompany September 27, 2024 08:32
@JesusPoderoso
Copy link
Contributor

CI issues are unrelated to the PR content
Ready to merge!

@JesusPoderoso JesusPoderoso added ready-to-merge Ready to be merged. CI and changes have been reviewed and approved. and removed ci-pending PR which CI is running labels Oct 2, 2024
@MiguelCompany MiguelCompany merged commit 0e133f9 into 2.14.x Oct 2, 2024
16 of 18 checks passed
@MiguelCompany MiguelCompany deleted the mergify/bp/2.14.x/pr-5262 branch October 2, 2024 06:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ready-to-merge Ready to be merged. CI and changes have been reviewed and approved.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants