-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 705
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
{math}[intel/2021b] sympy v1.9, gmpy2 v2.1.2 w/ Python 3.9.6 #17467
{math}[intel/2021b] sympy v1.9, gmpy2 v2.1.2 w/ Python 3.9.6 #17467
Conversation
Test report by @verdurin |
@boegelbot please test @ generoso |
@boegel: Request for testing this PR well received on login1 PR test command '
Test results coming soon (I hope)... - notification for comment with ID 1468220772 processed Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me, |
Test report by @boegelbot |
@verdurin Your failing test is probably because |
@boegelbot please test @ jsc-zen2 |
@boegel: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen2l1.int.jsc-zen2.easybuild-test.cluster PR test command '
Test results coming soon (I hope)... - notification for comment with ID 1468433523 processed Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me, |
Test report by @boegelbot |
Test report by @boegel |
Test report by @casparvl |
Test report by @casparvl |
Test report by @casparvl |
So... I had this other issue with files in another PR, and it made me check if I could build this one when using a local scratch disk as build & tmpdir. That build succeeded. Still, makes me wonder if the aforementioned patch is still relevant somehow. I'll probably not be the only one who will run into this. I will try to rebuild once more on our shared FS, see if I can indeed still reproduce the failure there after the succes on gcn71. |
Test report by @casparvl |
Yep, that's consistently failing on our GPFS, and succeeding on local scratch disks... |
I've tried to make a new quick-and-dirty patch,
but that didn't work. I don't know exactly where the failure comes from, I just looked for the points that looked somewhat similar to what was done in the previous patch. Anyway, it didn't help, and I don't really have the time to dive deeper into this. @boegel how do you think we can best proceed on this? |
Test report by @casparvl |
Just testing if I could still reproduce this, before making a PR for sympy's that use easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#2949. I've also reproduced the issue for |
…anced custom ea…syblock for sympy that also takes care of sanity check & co
@boegelbot please test @ generoso |
@boegel: Request for testing this PR well received on login1 PR test command '
Test results coming soon (I hope)... - notification for comment with ID 1666527765 processed Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me, |
Test report by @boegelbot |
@boegelbot please test @ jsc-zen2 |
@boegel: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen2l1.int.jsc-zen2.easybuild-test.cluster PR test command '
Test results coming soon (I hope)... - notification for comment with ID 1666539521 processed Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me, |
Test report by @boegelbot |
Test report by @boegel |
@casparvl Can you retest? This should be good to go now... |
Test report by @casparvl |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Lgtm!
Going in, thanks @boegel! |
(created using
eb --new-pr
)edit: requires that
numexpr
inSciPy-bundle/2021.10-intel-2021b
was reinstalled using fixed easyblock, see easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#2897edit: now requires: