Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

{lang} [intel/2017a] PyCUDA/2016.1.2 (REVIEW) #4523

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 27, 2017

Conversation

wpoely86
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@wpoely86
Copy link
Member Author

Test report by @wpoely86
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in this PR)
nic155 - Linux centos linux 7.3.1611, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v2 @ 2.80GHz, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/f2941ae52db1a0b118100b31a30421bd for a full test report.

@boegel boegel added this to the 3.2.0 milestone Apr 26, 2017
('Boost', '1.63.0', versionsuffix),
]

prebuildopts = "./configure.py --cuda-root=$EBROOTCUDA --boost-inc-dir=$EBROOTBOOST/include/boost/ --boost-lib-dir=$EBROOTBOOST/lib/ --no-use-shipped-boost --boost-python-libname=boost_python && "
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@wpoely86 please break this up, line is (way) too long...

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Apr 27, 2017

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in this PR)
node2066.delcatty.os - Linux centos linux 7.3.1611, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/948bb1319bbcd083daf23d9aeaf71b54 for a full test report.

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Apr 27, 2017

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in this PR)
node2571.golett.os - Linux centos linux 7.3.1611, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v3 @ 2.50GHz, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/c7704fc058eb89b12868717b3578d4f4 for a full test report.

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Apr 27, 2017

lgtm

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Apr 27, 2017

Going in, thanks @wpoely86!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants