Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

{lib}[intel/2018b,foss/2018b] scikit-build v0.10.0 w/ Python 3.6.6 #9762

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 31, 2020
Merged

{lib}[intel/2018b,foss/2018b] scikit-build v0.10.0 w/ Python 3.6.6 #9762

merged 4 commits into from
Jan 31, 2020

Conversation

schiotz
Copy link
Contributor

@schiotz schiotz commented Jan 22, 2020

(created using eb --new-pr)

@schiotz schiotz changed the title {lib}[intel/2018b] scikit-build v0.10.0 w/ Python 3.6.6 {lib}[intel/2018b,foss/2018b] scikit-build v0.10.0 w/ Python 3.6.6 Jan 23, 2020
@verdurin
Copy link
Member

Test report by @verdurin
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 2 out of 2 (2 easyconfigs in this PR)
generoso - Linux centos linux 7.6.1810, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2660 v4 @ 2.00GHz, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/63411ccfb78ecd4678011e1e3d18a832 for a full test report.

@verdurin verdurin added this to the next release (4.1.2?) milestone Jan 31, 2020
@verdurin verdurin added the new label Jan 31, 2020
verdurin
verdurin approved these changes Jan 31, 2020
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@verdurin verdurin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks fine.

@verdurin
Copy link
Member

Going in, thanks @schiotz!

@verdurin verdurin merged commit ec3a41b into easybuilders:develop Jan 31, 2020
@easybuilders easybuilders deleted a comment from boegelbot Feb 15, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@verdurin verdurin verdurin approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
new
Projects
None yet
Milestone
4.2.0
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@schiotz @verdurin