-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Steve/fix-v3-bricks #1388
Steve/fix-v3-bricks #1388
Conversation
Walkthrough本次更改包括对 Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #1388 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 85.12% 85.12%
=======================================
Files 503 503
Lines 14834 14834
Branches 2214 2214
=======================================
Hits 12628 12628
Misses 1775 1775
Partials 431 431
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
bricks/form/src/select/index.tsx (1)
270-271
: 使用现代 JS 私有字段语法将
_handleOptionsChange
重命名为#handleOptionsChange
符合现代 JavaScript 的私有字段语法规范。建议在其他私有方法上也采用相同的命名约定,例如:
- private handleChange + #handleChange
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
bricks/advanced/src/next-table/styles.shadow.css
(2 hunks)bricks/form/src/select/index.tsx
(7 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
bricks/advanced/src/next-table/styles.shadow.css (1)
38-41
: 表格包装器样式设计合理!
使用 CSS 变量来控制背景和内边距,便于主题定制,符合最佳实践。
bricks/form/src/select/index.tsx (3)
91-91
: 属性重命名以避免与原生事件冲突
将 onFocus
重命名为 onSelectFocus
是一个很好的改进,这样可以避免与原生的 focus 事件混淆。
241-244
: 事件类型更新以避免重复触发
将事件类型从 "focus" 更新为 "select.focus" 是一个很好的改进,可以避免与原生事件冲突导致的多次触发问题。注释中清晰地说明了这个更改的原因。
289-291
: 事件处理方法重命名与使用更新
handleFocus
重命名为 handleSelectFocus
并更新了相关调用,保持了命名的一致性。但建议检查是否有遗漏的调用点。
Also applies to: 392-399
✅ Verification successful
Let me search for any references to the old method name specifically in the select component to verify if there are any missed call sites.
Let me try to search for any references to both the old and new method names in the select component to ensure we have a complete picture.
方法重命名验证完成:更改已正确实施
根据代码搜索结果,handleFocus
已被完全重命名为 handleSelectFocus
,且在组件内部的调用点也已正确更新为 onSelectFocus={this.handleSelectFocus}
。没有发现任何遗漏的旧方法名称的使用。其他文件中的 handleFocus
都属于不同组件的独立实现,不受此更改影响。
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# 检查是否还有其他地方使用了旧的方法名
rg "handleFocus" --type ts
Length of output: 1460
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for handleFocus specifically in the select component files
rg "handleFocus" bricks/form/src/select/ -A 3
Length of output: 45
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for both old and new method names in select component
rg "handle.*Focus" bricks/form/src/select/ -A 3
# Also check for any focus-related event bindings
rg "onFocus" bricks/form/src/select/ -A 3
Length of output: 490
🚀 Deployed on https://docs-preview-1388--next-bricks.netlify.app |
📐🤏 Size check result (b7644ba...fee1355): Load all bricks together
Critical changes: None. See full changes
Load bricks by each packageCritical changes: None. See full changes
Load by each brickCritical changes: None. See full changes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
bricks/advanced/src/next-table/styles.shadow.css (1)
38-41
: 建议为CSS变量添加默认值
.ant-table-wrapper
的样式使用了 CSS 变量来控制背景和内边距,这种做法很灵活。不过建议为这些变量设置默认值,以防变量未定义的情况。建议按照以下方式修改:
.ant-table-wrapper { - background: var(--eo-table-wrapper-background); - padding: var(--eo-table-wrapper-padding); + background: var(--eo-table-wrapper-background, transparent); + padding: var(--eo-table-wrapper-padding, 0); }bricks/form/src/select/index.tsx (1)
392-399
: 建议优化点击处理函数的条件逻辑当前的条件逻辑结构可以进行优化,建议重构以提高可读性。
建议按照以下方式重构:
- if (!value) { - setIsDropHidden(false); - setIsFocused(true); - onSelectFocus?.(); - inputRef.current && inputRef.current.focus(); - } else if (!disabled) { - setIsDropHidden(!isDropHidden); - setIsFocused(true); - inputRef.current && inputRef.current.focus(); - } + if (disabled) { + return; + } + + setIsFocused(true); + onSelectFocus?.(); + inputRef.current?.focus(); + + setIsDropHidden(value ? !isDropHidden : false);
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
bricks/advanced/src/next-table/styles.shadow.css
(2 hunks)bricks/form/src/select/index.tsx
(7 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
bricks/advanced/src/next-table/styles.shadow.css (1)
89-92
: 确认嵌套表格样式的兼容性
嵌套表格的样式设置合理,使用了语义化的变量名。但需要验证在不同层级嵌套时的表现。
运行以下脚本检查是否存在多层嵌套表格的使用场景:
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the nested table implementation to verify the compatibility.
Let me check one more aspect about the nested table implementation to ensure we have a complete picture.
嵌套表格样式设置已验证完成
根据代码分析,当前的嵌套表格样式实现是合理的:
- 使用
--eo-table-wrapper-background
和--eo-table-wrapper-padding
变量正确设置了嵌套表格的样式 - 样式作用域限定在
.ant-table-expanded-row eo-next-table
选择器内,不会影响其他场景 - 组件提供了完整的展开行功能支持,包括
expandable
、expandedRowKeys
等属性 - 测试用例中包含了基础的展开功能测试
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# 描述:检查代码库中是否存在多层嵌套表格的使用场景
# 搜索包含多个 .ant-table-expanded-row 的模板
rg -l "ant-table-expanded-row.*ant-table-expanded-row"
# 搜索相关的文档或测试用例
fd -e md -e test.tsx -e spec.tsx | xargs rg "table.*expand"
Length of output: 996
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# 检查嵌套表格的具体实现和测试用例
ast-grep --pattern 'expandedRowRender'
# 检查表格样式文件中的嵌套相关样式
rg -A 3 "ant-table-expanded-row" bricks/advanced/src/next-table/styles.shadow.css
# 检查表格组件的测试用例中关于嵌套的测试
rg -A 5 "describe.*expand" bricks/advanced/src/next-table/index.spec.tsx
Length of output: 732
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# 检查嵌套表格的实现细节
rg -A 10 "expandable" bricks/advanced/src/next-table/index.tsx
# 检查是否有其他相关的样式变量定义
rg "antd-table-row-expand" bricks/advanced/src/next-table/
Length of output: 876
bricks/form/src/select/index.tsx (4)
91-91
: 属性重命名符合最佳实践
将 onFocus
重命名为 onSelectFocus
可以避免与原生 focus 事件的命名冲突,这是一个很好的改进。
241-244
: 事件类型重命名提供了更好的语义
将事件类型从 focus
改为 select.focus
不仅避免了与原生事件的冲突,还通过命名空间提供了更清晰的语义,表明这是 select 组件特有的 focus 事件。
289-291
: 处理函数重命名保持一致性
处理函数的重命名与属性和事件类型的变更保持一致,维护了代码的一致性。
321-323
: 属性传递完整性验证
确保所有必要的属性都已正确传递给组件。
依赖检查
组件之间的依赖声明,是微服务组件架构下的重要信息,请确保其正确性。
请勾选以下两组选项其中之一:
或者:
提交信息检查
Git 提交信息将决定包的版本发布及自动生成的 CHANGELOG,请检查工作内容与提交信息是否相符,并在以下每组选项中都依次确认。
破坏性变更:
feat
作为提交类型。BREAKING CHANGE: 你的变更说明
。新特性:
feat
作为提交类型。问题修复:
fix
作为提交类型。杂项工作:
即所有对下游使用者无任何影响、且没有必要显示在 CHANGELOG 中的改动,例如修改注释、测试用例、开发文档等:
chore
,docs
,test
等作为提交类型。Summary by CodeRabbit
新功能
.ant-table-wrapper
类,提供自定义背景和内边距样式。onSelectFocus
代替onFocus
,以避免与原生焦点事件冲突。样式
文档