chore: Propagate Bitbucket SAAS Oauth secret properties

[vinokurig]

Signed-off-by: Igor Vinokur ivinokur@redhat.com

What does this PR do?

Add Bitbucket Oauth2 properties support. Propagate Bitbucket SAAS client id and client secret Oauth2 properties as workpsace environment variables.

Screenshot/screencast of this PR

What issues does this PR fix or reference?

eclipse-che/che#21517

How to test this PR?

cat EOF << > /tmp/patch.yaml
<PATCH_CONTENT>
EOF

chectl server:deploy \
     --installer operator \
     --platform <PLATFORM_TO_DEPLOY> \
     --che-operator-image <CUSTOM_OPERATOR_IMAGE> \
     --che-operator-cr-patch-yaml /tmp/patch.yaml

Create bitbucket oauth secret in the che-server namespace:

kind: Secret
apiVersion: v1
metadata:
  name: bitbucket-oauth-config
  namespace: eclipse-che
  labels:
    app.kubernetes.io/component: oauth-scm-configuration
    app.kubernetes.io/part-of: che.eclipse.org
  annotations:
    che.eclipse.org/oauth-scm-server: bitbucket
data:
  id:<base 64 encoded client id from the bitbucket oauth consummer>
  secret: <base 64 encoded secret from the bitbucket oauth consummer>
type: Opaque

Start a workspace and see the Bitbucket Oauth2 environment variable

PR Checklist

As the author of this Pull Request I made sure that:

• The Eclipse Contributor Agreement is valid
• Code produced is complete
• Code builds without errors
• Tests are covering the bugfix
• Custom resource definition file is up to date
• OLM bundles are up to date
• The repository devfile is up to date and works
• Sections What issues does this PR fix or reference and How to test this PR completed
• Relevant user documentation updated
• Relevant contributing documentation updated
• CI/CD changes implemented, documented and communicated

Reviewers

Reviewers, please comment how you tested the PR when approving it.

[tolusha]

Pls run make fmt to format the code

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #1445 (1ec10ff) into main (35bd691) will increase coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

❗ Current head 1ec10ff differs from pull request most recent head 9dbed7e. Consider uploading reports for the commit 9dbed7e to get more accurate results

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1445      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   60.41%   60.43%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          74       74              
  Lines        6286     6288       +2     
==========================================
+ Hits         3798     3800       +2     
  Misses       2118     2118              
  Partials      370      370              

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
api/v2/zz_generated.deepcopy.go	0.00% <ø> (ø)
pkg/deploy/server/server_deployment.go	80.78% <100.00%> (+0.13%)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 35bd691...9dbed7e. Read the comment docs.

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: tolusha, vinokurig

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[openshift-ci]

@vinokurig: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name	Commit	Details	Required	Rerun command
ci/prow/v9-devworkspace-happy-path	9dbed7e	link	true	/test v9-devworkspace-happy-path

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.