-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 355
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
AsyncContext completion attempt after AsyncListener.onError is called #5675
Comments
@lorban anything else to add here? |
@wendigo no; you accurately described the problem. |
It looks like creating the test case is the most difficult part here |
@jansupol is there a plan to fix this issue? |
Yes, we plan to check on the possibilities for this. |
I don't know about this part but I would like to take a look. My understanding is that the issue is happening in the server side. The server receives Are you able to print the stacktrace when |
Actually async context can complete with error on a different thread than the competing thread that will try to complete with a result. It seems that this isn't synchronized in any way. |
In Jetty it's pretty visible because when the context is completed (successfully or not) the resources are recycled which causes errors to be logged (request/response doesn't exist) |
Here you go, this is the stacktrace received by In this case, the EOF results in a completed (and set to committed) response (if not completed yet).
|
Also note that Jersey works with the behaviors of the Servlet spec. That means the HttpServletRequest / HttpServletResponse objects can be reused / recycled for other requests / responses. |
I am reproducing it in
|
I found that the exception was not re-throw because the response was already committed. I have modified the code, so if the exception is instance of IOException, we still throw it up so the container can do something. Now the exception reaches the Jetty container (as you can see in the next screenshoot) but I am having questions about whether it is going to reuse request/response objects or not. Maybe you can help me with this verification, I will write instructions soon. |
…clipse-ee4j#5675 Signed-off-by: Jorge Bescos Gascon <jorge.bescos.gascon@oracle.com>
@wendigo could you help me to verify the fix?. Although I am trying to help, I am not expert in this area. Could you overwrite the class inside the zip under |
Hi Jetty experts!, did any of you have a chance to verify the fix?. |
…clipse-ee4j#5675 Signed-off-by: Jorge Bescos Gascon <jorge.bescos.gascon@oracle.com>
…clipse-ee4j#5675 Signed-off-by: Jorge Bescos Gascon <jorge.bescos.gascon@oracle.com>
…clipse-ee4j#5675 Signed-off-by: Jorge Bescos Gascon <jorge.bescos.gascon@oracle.com>
We've observer an issue with Jersey 3.1.+ running in the Jetty EE10 container that applies to HTTP/2 protocol.
When client disconnects in the middle of the request (due to a timeout or whatever), it sends a RST_STREAM frame that on the server side, finishes an AsyncContext with an error through the AsyncListener.onError. It seems that Jersey doesn't understand this condition, and still tries to finish an AsyncContext when the AsyncResponse.complete is called. Since Jetty recycles request/response objects on AsyncContext error, there is no response to write output to, and the jersey code generates a non-actionable warning.
We've work around this issue by implementing trinodb/trino#22315 that seems to do a trick. I'd like to see a permanent solution on the Jersey side instead.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: