This document describes various baselines for the TREC-COVID Challenge, which uses the COVID-19 Open Research Dataset (CORD-19) from the Allen Institute for AI. Here, we focus on running retrieval experiments; for basic instructions on building Anserini indexes, see this page.
All the runs referenced on this page are stored in this repo. As an alternative to downloading each run separately, clone the repo and you'll have everything.
These are runs that can be easily replicated with Anserini, from pre-built indexes available here (version from 2020/07/16, the official corpus used in round 5).
They were prepared for round 5 (for participants who wish to have a baseline run to rerank); to provide a sense of effectiveness, we present evaluation results with the cumulative qrels from rounds 1, 2, 3, and 4 (qrels_covid_d4_j0.5-4.txt provided by NIST, stored in our repo as qrels.covid-round4-cumulative.txt).
| index | field(s) | nDCG@10 | J@10 | R@1k | run file | checksum | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | abstract | query+question | 0.4580 | 0.5880 | 0.4525 | [download] | b1ccc364cc9dab03b383b71a51d3c6cb |
| 2 | abstract | UDel qgen | 0.4912 | 0.6240 | 0.4714 | [download] | ee4e3e6cf87dba2fd021fbb89bd07a89 |
| 3 | full-text | query+question | 0.3240 | 0.5660 | 0.3758 | [download] | d7457dd746533326f2bf8e85834ecf5c |
| 4 | full-text | UDel qgen | 0.4634 | 0.6460 | 0.4368 | [download] | 8387e4ad480ec4be7961c17d2ea326a1 |
| 5 | paragraph | query+question | 0.4077 | 0.6160 | 0.4877 | [download] | 62d713a1ed6a8bf25c1454c66182b573 |
| 6 | paragraph | UDel qgen | 0.4918 | 0.6440 | 0.5101 | [download] | 16b295fda9d1eccd4e1fa4c147657872 |
| 7 | - | reciprocal rank fusion(1, 3, 5) | 0.4696 | 0.6520 | 0.5027 | [download] | 16875b6d32a9b5ef96d7b59315b101a7 |
| 8 | - | reciprocal rank fusion(2, 4, 6) | 0.5077 | 0.6800 | 0.5378 | [download] | 8f7d663d551f831c65dceb8e4e9219c2 |
| 9 | abstract | UDel qgen + RF | 0.6177 | 0.6620 | 0.5505 | [download] | 909ccbbd55736eff60c7dbeff1404c94 |
IMPORTANT NOTES!!!
- These runs are performed at
a3764c, 2020/07/23. - J@10 refers to Judged@10 and R@1k refers to Recall@1000.
- The evaluation numbers are produced with the NIST-prepared cumulative qrels from rounds 1, 2, 3, and 4 (
qrels_covid_d4_j0.5-4.txtprovided by NIST, stored in our repo asqrels.covid-round4-cumulative.txt) on the round 5 collection (release of 7/16). - For the abstract and full-text indexes, we request up to 10k hits for each topic; the number of actual hits retrieved is fairly close to this (a bit less because of deduping). For the paragraph index, we request up to 50k hits for each topic; because multiple paragraphs are retrieved from the same document, the number of unique documents in each list of hits is much smaller. A cautionary note: our experience is that choosing the top k documents to rerank has a large impact on end-to-end effectiveness. Reranking the top 100 seems to provide higher precision than top 1000, but the likely tradeoff is lower recall. It is very likely the case that you don't want to rerank all available hits.
- Row 9 represents the feedback baseline condition introduced in round 3: abstract index, UDel query generator, BM25+RM3 relevance feedback (100 feedback terms).
- (Updates 2020/07/27) Fixed a bug in the relevance feedback runs where we were using the round 3 cumulative qrels (instead of the round 4 ones).
The final runs submitted to NIST, after removing judgments from 1, 2, 3, and 4 (cumulatively), are as follows:
| group | runtag | run file | checksum |
|---|---|---|---|
anserini |
r5.fusion1 = Row 7 |
[download] | 12122c12089c2b07a8f6c7247aebe2f6 |
anserini |
r5.fusion2 = Row 8 |
[download] | ff1a0bac315de6703b937c552b351e2a |
anserini |
r5.rf = Row 9 |
[download] | 74e2a73b5ffd2908dc23b14c765171a1 |
We have written scripts that automate the replication of these baselines:
$ python src/main/python/trec-covid/download_indexes.py --date 2020-07-16
$ python src/main/python/trec-covid/generate_round5_baselines.py
Since the above runs were prepared for round 5, we do not know how well they actually performed until the round 5 judgments from NIST were released. Here, we provide these evaluation results.
Note that the runs posted on the TREC-COVID archive are not exactly the same the runs we submitted.
According to NIST (from email to participants), they removed "documents that were previously judged but had id changes from the Round 5 submissions for scoring, even though the change in cord_uid was unknown at submission time."
The actual evaluated runs are (mirrored from URL above):
| group | runtag | run file | checksum |
|---|---|---|---|
anserini |
r5.fusion1 (NIST post-processed) |
[download] | f1ebdd7f7b8403b53e89a5993fb55dd2 |
anserini |
r5.fusion2 (NIST post-processed) |
[download] | 77ce612916becbb5ccfd6d891f797d1d |
anserini |
r5.rf (NIST post-processed) |
[download] | dd765fa9491c585476735115eb966ea2 |
Effectiveness results (note that starting in Round 4, NIST changed from nDCG@10 to nDCG@20):
| group | runtag | nDCG@20 | J@20 | AP | R@1k |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
anserini |
r5.fusion1 |
0.5244 | 0.8490 | 0.2302 | 0.5615 |
anserini |
r5.fusion1 (NIST post-processed) |
0.5313 | 0.8570 | 0.2314 | 0.5615 |
anserini |
r5.fusion2 |
0.5941 | 0.9080 | 0.2716 | 0.6012 |
anserini |
r5.fusion2 (NIST post-processed) |
0.6007 | 0.9150 | 0.2734 | 0.6012 |
anserini |
r5.rf |
0.7193 | 0.9270 | 0.3235 | 0.6378 |
anserini |
r5.rf (NIST post-processed) |
0.7346 | 0.9470 | 0.3280 | 0.6378 |
The scores of the post-processed runs match those reported by NIST. We see that NIST post-processing improves scores slightly.
Below, we report the effectiveness of the runs using the "complete" cumulative qrels file (covering rounds 1 through 5).
This qrels file, provided by NIST as qrels-covid_d5_j0.5-5.txt, is stored in our repo as qrels.covid-complete.txt).
| index | field(s) | nDCG@10 | J@10 | nDCG@20 | J@20 | AP | R@1k | J@1k | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | abstract | query+question | 0.6925 | 0.9740 | 0.6586 | 0.9700 | 0.3010 | 0.4636 | 0.4159 |
| 2 | abstract | UDel qgen | 0.7301 | 0.9980 | 0.6979 | 0.9900 | 0.3230 | 0.4839 | 0.4286 |
| 3 | full-text | query+question | 0.4709 | 0.8920 | 0.4382 | 0.8370 | 0.1777 | 0.3427 | 0.3397 |
| 4 | full-text | UDel qgen | 0.6286 | 0.9840 | 0.5973 | 0.9630 | 0.2391 | 0.4087 | 0.3875 |
| 5 | paragraph | query+question | 0.5832 | 0.9600 | 0.5659 | 0.9390 | 0.2808 | 0.4695 | 0.4412 |
| 6 | paragraph | UDel qgen | 0.6764 | 0.9840 | 0.6368 | 0.9740 | 0.3089 | 0.4949 | 0.4542 |
| 7 | - | reciprocal rank fusion(1, 3, 5) | 0.6469 | 0.9860 | 0.6184 | 0.9800 | 0.2952 | 0.4967 | 0.4675 |
| 8 | - | reciprocal rank fusion(2, 4, 6) | 0.6972 | 1.0000 | 0.6785 | 1.0000 | 0.3329 | 0.5313 | 0.4869 |
| 9 | abstract | UDel qgen + RF | 0.8395 | 1.0000 | 0.7955 | 0.9990 | 0.3911 | 0.5536 | 0.4607 |
Note that all of the results above can be replicated with the following scripts:
$ python src/main/python/trec-covid/download_indexes.py --date 2020-07-16
$ python src/main/python/trec-covid/generate_round5_baselines.pyThese are runs that can be easily replicated with Anserini, from pre-built indexes available here (version from 2020/06/19, the official corpus used in round 4).
They were prepared for round 4 (for participants who wish to have a baseline run to rerank); to provide a sense of effectiveness, we present evaluation results with the cumulative qrels from rounds 1, 2, and 3 (qrels_covid_d3_j0.5-3.txt provided by NIST, stored in our repo as qrels.covid-round3-cumulative.txt).
| index | field(s) | nDCG@10 | J@10 | R@1k | run file | checksum | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | abstract | query+question | 0.3143 | 0.4467 | 0.4257 | [download] | 56ac5a0410e235243ca6e9f0f00eefa1 |
| 2 | abstract | UDel qgen | 0.3260 | 0.4378 | 0.4432 | [download] | 115d6d2e308b47ffacbc642175095c74 |
| 3 | full-text | query+question | 0.2108 | 0.4044 | 0.3891 | [download] | af0d10a5344f4007e6781e8d2959eb54 |
| 4 | full-text | UDel qgen | 0.3499 | 0.5067 | 0.4537 | [download] | 594d469b8f45cf808092a3d8e870eaf5 |
| 5 | paragraph | query+question | 0.3229 | 0.5267 | 0.4863 | [download] | 6f468b7b60aaa05fc215d237b5475aec |
| 6 | paragraph | UDel qgen | 0.4016 | 0.5333 | 0.5050 | [download] | b7b39629c12573ee0bfed8687dacc743 |
| 7 | - | reciprocal rank fusion(1, 3, 5) | 0.3424 | 0.5289 | 0.5033 | [download] | 8ae9d1fca05bd1d9bfe7b24d1bdbe270 |
| 8 | - | reciprocal rank fusion(2, 4, 6) | 0.4004 | 0.5400 | 0.5291 | [download] | e1894209c815c96c6ddd4cacb578261a |
| 9 | abstract | UDel qgen + RF | 0.4598 | 0.5044 | 0.5330 | [download] | 9d954f31e2f07e11ff559bcb14ef16af |
IMPORTANT NOTES!!!
- These runs are performed at
b8609a, at the release of Anserini 0.9.4. - J@10 refers to Judged@10 and R@1k refers to Recall@1000.
- The evaluation numbers are produced with the NIST-prepared cumulative qrels from rounds 1, 2, and 3 (
qrels_covid_d3_j0.5-3.txtprovided by NIST, stored in our repo asqrels.covid-round3-cumulative.txt) on the round 4 collection (release of 6/19). - For the abstract and full-text indexes, we request up to 10k hits for each topic; the number of actual hits retrieved is fairly close to this (a bit less because of deduping). For the paragraph index, we request up to 50k hits for each topic; because multiple paragraphs are retrieved from the same document, the number of unique documents in each list of hits is much smaller. A cautionary note: our experience is that choosing the top k documents to rerank has a large impact on end-to-end effectiveness. Reranking the top 100 seems to provide higher precision than top 1000, but the likely tradeoff is lower recall. It is very likely the case that you don't want to rerank all available hits.
- Row 9 represents the feedback baseline condition introduced in round 3: abstract index, UDel query generator, BM25+RM3 relevance feedback (100 feedback terms).
The final runs submitted to NIST, after removing judgments from 1, 2, and 3 (cumulatively), are as follows:
| group | runtag | run file | checksum |
|---|---|---|---|
anserini |
r4.fusion1 = Row 7 |
[download] | a8ab52e12c151012adbfc8e37d666760 |
anserini |
r4.fusion2 = Row 8 |
[download] | 1500104c928f463f38e76b58b91d4c07 |
anserini |
r4.rf = Row 9 |
[download] | 41d746eb86a99d2f33068ebc195072cd |
We have written scripts that automate the replication of these baselines:
$ python src/main/python/trec-covid/download_indexes.py --date 2020-06-19
$ python src/main/python/trec-covid/generate_round4_baselines.py
Since the above runs were prepared for round 4, we do not know how well they actually performed until the round 4 judgments from NIST were released. Here, we provide these evaluation results.
Note that the runs posted on the TREC-COVID archive are not exactly the same the runs we submitted.
According to NIST (from email to participants), they removed "documents that were previously judged but had id changes from the Round 4 submissions for scoring, even though the change in cord_uid was unknown at submission time."
The actual evaluated runs are (mirrored from URL above):
| group | runtag | run file | checksum |
|---|---|---|---|
anserini |
r4.fusion1 (NIST post-processed) |
[download] | b0ebafe36d8fc721ea6923da5837aa8c |
anserini |
r4.fusion2 (NIST post-processed) |
[download] | e7e0b870c6822e7127df71608923e76b |
anserini |
r4.rf (NIST post-processed) |
[download] | 2fcd53854461e0cbe3c9170c0da234d9 |
Effectiveness results (note that NIST changed from nDCG@10 to nDCG@20 for this round):
| group | runtag | nDCG@20 | J@20 | AP | R@1k |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
anserini |
r4.fusion1 |
0.5204 | 0.7922 | 0.2656 | 0.6571 |
anserini |
r4.fusion1 (NIST post-processed) |
0.5244 | 0.7978 | 0.2666 | 0.6571 |
anserini |
r4.fusion2 |
0.6047 | 0.8978 | 0.3078 | 0.6928 |
anserini |
r4.fusion2 (NIST post-processed) |
0.6089 | 0.9022 | 0.3088 | 0.6928 |
anserini |
r4.rf |
0.6940 | 0.9233 | 0.3506 | 0.6962 |
anserini |
r4.rf (NIST post-processed) |
0.6976 | 0.9278 | 0.3519 | 0.6962 |
The scores of the post-processed runs match those reported by NIST. We see that NIST post-processing improves scores slightly.
Below, we report the effectiveness of the runs using the cumulative qrels file from round 4.
This qrels file, provided by NIST as qrels_covid_d4_j0.5-4.txt, is stored in our repo as qrels.covid-round4-cumulative.txt).
| index | field(s) | nDCG@10 | J@10 | nDCG@20 | J@20 | AP | R@1k | J@1k | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | abstract | query+question | 0.6600 | 0.9356 | 0.6120 | 0.9111 | 0.2780 | 0.5019 | 0.2876 |
| 2 | abstract | UDel qgen | 0.7081 | 0.9844 | 0.6650 | 0.9622 | 0.2994 | 0.5233 | 0.2987 |
| 3 | full-text | query+question | 0.4192 | 0.8067 | 0.3984 | 0.7544 | 0.1712 | 0.4139 | 0.2740 |
| 4 | full-text | UDel qgen | 0.6110 | 0.9400 | 0.5668 | 0.8933 | 0.2344 | 0.4856 | 0.3079 |
| 5 | paragraph | query+question | 0.5610 | 0.9133 | 0.5324 | 0.8756 | 0.2713 | 0.5385 | 0.3386 |
| 6 | paragraph | UDel qgen | 0.6477 | 0.9644 | 0.6084 | 0.9322 | 0.2975 | 0.5625 | 0.3443 |
| 7 | - | reciprocal rank fusion(1, 3, 5) | 0.6271 | 0.9689 | 0.5968 | 0.9422 | 0.2904 | 0.5623 | 0.3519 |
| 8 | - | reciprocal rank fusion(2, 4, 6) | 0.6802 | 1.0000 | 0.6573 | 0.9956 | 0.3286 | 0.5946 | 0.3625 |
| 9 | abstract | UDel qgen + RF | 0.8056 | 1.0000 | 0.7649 | 0.9967 | 0.3663 | 0.5955 | 0.3229 |
Note that all of the results above can be replicated with the following scripts:
$ python src/main/python/trec-covid/download_indexes.py --date 2020-06-19
$ python src/main/python/trec-covid/generate_round4_baselines.pyThese are runs that can be easily replicated with Anserini, from pre-built indexes available here (version from 2020/05/19, the official corpus used in round 3). They were prepared for round 3 (for participants who wish to have a baseline run to rerank); to provide a sense of effectiveness, we present evaluation results with the union of round 1 and round 2 qrels.
| index | field(s) | nDCG@10 | J@10 | R@1k | run file | checksum | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | abstract | query+question | 0.2118 | 0.3300 | 0.4398 | [download] | d08d85c87e30d6c4abf54799806d282f |
| 2 | abstract | UDel qgen | 0.2470 | 0.3375 | 0.4537 | [download] | d552dff90995cd860a5727637f0be4d1 |
| 3 | full-text | query+question | 0.2337 | 0.4650 | 0.4817 | [download] | 6c9f4c09d842b887262ca84d61c61a1f |
| 4 | full-text | UDel qgen | 0.3430 | 0.5025 | 0.5267 | [download] | c5f9db7733c72eea78ece2ade44d3d35 |
| 5 | paragraph | query+question | 0.2848 | 0.5175 | 0.5527 | [download] | 872673b3e12c661748d8899f24d3ba48 |
| 6 | paragraph | UDel qgen | 0.3604 | 0.5050 | 0.5676 | [download] | c1b966e4c3f387b6810211f339b35852 |
| 7 | - | reciprocal rank fusion(1, 3, 5) | 0.3093 | 0.4975 | 0.5566 | [download] | 61cbd73c6e60ba44f18ce967b5b0e5b3 |
| 8 | - | reciprocal rank fusion(2, 4, 6) | 0.3568 | 0.5250 | 0.5769 | [download] | d7eabf3dab840104c88de925e918fdab |
| 9 | abstract | UDel qgen + RF | 0.3633 | 0.3800 | 0.5722 | [download] | e6a44f1f7183de10f892c6d922110934 |
IMPORTANT NOTES!!!
- These runs are performed at
2b4dcc2, at the release of Anserini 0.9.3. - J@10 refers to Judged@10 and R@1k refers to Recall@1000.
- The evaluation numbers are produced with the union of both round 1 qrels and round 2 qrels on the round 3 collection (release of 5/19).
- For the abstract and full-text indexes, we request up to 10k hits for each topic; the number of actual hits retrieved is fairly close to this (a bit less because of deduping). For the paragraph index, we request up to 50k hits for each topic; because multiple paragraphs are retrieved from the same document, the number of unique documents in each list of hits is much smaller. A cautionary note: our experience is that choosing the top k documents to rerank has a large impact on end-to-end effectiveness. Reranking the top 100 seems to provide higher precision than top 1000, but the likely tradeoff is lower recall. It is very likely the case that you don't want to rerank all available hits.
- For reciprocal rank fusion, the underlying fusion library returns only up to 1000 hits per topic. This was a known issue for round 2, since the Anserini fusion script did not specify a larger value. However, this does appear to be a limitation in the underlying library, see this issue.
- Row 9 represents a new relevance feedback baseline condition introduced in round 3: abstract index, UDel query generator, BM25+RM3 relevance feedback (100 feedback terms). The code was in PR #1236 and had not been merged at the time of submission because we had not completed regression testing. The PR has since been merged.
The final runs submitted to NIST, after removing judgments from round 1 and round 2, are as follows:
| group | runtag | run file | checksum |
|---|---|---|---|
anserini |
r3.fusion1 = Row 7 |
[download] | c1caf63a9c3b02f0b12e233112fc79a6 |
anserini |
r3.fusion2 = Row 8 |
[download] | 12679197846ed77306ecb2ca7895b011 |
anserini |
r3.rf = Row 9 |
[download] | 7192a08c5275b59d5ef18395917ff694 |
We resolved the issue from round 2 where the final submitted runs have less than 1000 hits per topic.
We have written scripts that automate the replication of these baselines:
$ python src/main/python/trec-covid/download_indexes.py --date 2020-05-19
$ python src/main/python/trec-covid/generate_round3_baselines.pyNote that these scripts were written after the release of the round 3 qrels (previously, the runs were generated by a series of shells commands). However, we have confirmed that they produce exactly the same output (i.e., identical checksums) as the runs generated previously. The history of this file in the repo contains those commands for historical/archival interest.
Since the above runs were prepared for round 3, we do not know how well they actually performed until the round 3 judgments from NIST were released. Here, we provide these evaluation results.
NIST provides the following caveat here:
Since there were previously judged documents whose doc-ids changed between the Round 1 and Round 2 judgment sets and the Round 3 data sets, these documents were removed from submissions by NIST. Almost all runs had some documents removed.
Thus, the runs submitted above were not the actual runs evaluated by NIST. They are, instead:
| group | runtag | run file | checksum |
|---|---|---|---|
anserini |
r3.fusion1 (NIST post-processed) |
[download] | f7c69c9bff381a847af86e5a8daf7526 |
anserini |
r3.fusion2 (NIST post-processed) |
[download] | 84c5fd2c7de0a0282266033ac4f27c22 |
anserini |
r3.rf (NIST post-processed) |
[download] | 3e79099639a9426cb53afe7066239011 |
Effectiveness results:
| group | runtag | nDCG@10 | J@10 | AP | R@1k |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
anserini |
r3.fusion1 |
0.5339 | 0.8400 | 0.2283 | 0.6160 |
anserini |
r3.fusion1 (NIST post-processed) |
0.5359 | 0.8475 | 0.2293 | 0.6160 |
anserini |
r3.fusion2 |
0.6072 | 0.9025 | 0.2631 | 0.6441 |
anserini |
r3.fusion2 (NIST post-processed) |
0.6100 | 0.9100 | 0.2641 | 0.6441 |
anserini |
r3.rf |
0.6812 | 0.9600 | 0.2787 | 0.6399 |
anserini |
r3.rf (NIST post-processed) |
0.6883 | 0.9750 | 0.2817 | 0.6399 |
The scores of the post-processed runs match those reported by NIST. We see that NIST post-processing improves scores slightly.
Below, we report the effectiveness of the runs using the cumulative qrels file from round 3.
This qrels file, provided by NIST as qrels_covid_d3_j0.5-3.txt, is stored in our repo as qrels.covid-round3-cumulative.txt.
| index | field(s) | nDCG@10 | J@10 | nDCG@20 | J@20 | AP | R@1k | J@1k | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | abstract | query+question | 0.5781 | 0.8875 | 0.5359 | 0.8325 | 0.2348 | 0.5040 | 0.2351 |
| 2 | abstract | UDel qgen | 0.6291 | 0.9300 | 0.5972 | 0.8925 | 0.2525 | 0.5215 | 0.2370 |
| 3 | full-text | query+question | 0.3977 | 0.7500 | 0.3681 | 0.7213 | 0.1646 | 0.4708 | 0.2471 |
| 4 | full-text | UDel qgen | 0.5790 | 0.9050 | 0.5234 | 0.8525 | 0.2236 | 0.5313 | 0.2693 |
| 5 | paragraph | query+question | 0.5396 | 0.9425 | 0.5079 | 0.9050 | 0.2498 | 0.5766 | 0.2978 |
| 6 | paragraph | UDel qgen | 0.6327 | 0.9600 | 0.5793 | 0.9162 | 0.2753 | 0.5923 | 0.2956 |
| 7 | - | reciprocal rank fusion(1, 3, 5) | 0.5924 | 0.9625 | 0.5563 | 0.9362 | 0.2700 | 0.5956 | 0.3045 |
| 8 | - | reciprocal rank fusion(2, 4, 6) | 0.6515 | 0.9875 | 0.6200 | 0.9675 | 0.3027 | 0.6194 | 0.3076 |
| 9 | abstract | UDel qgen + RF | 0.7459 | 0.9875 | 0.7023 | 0.9637 | 0.3190 | 0.6125 | 0.2600 |
Note that all of the results above can be replicated with the following scripts:
$ python src/main/python/trec-covid/download_indexes.py --date 2020-05-19
$ python src/main/python/trec-covid/generate_round3_baselines.pyThese are runs that can be easily replicated with Anserini, from pre-built indexes available here (version from 2020/05/01, the official corpus used in round 2). They were prepared for round 2 (for participants who wish to have a baseline run to rerank), and so effectiveness is computed with round 1 qrels.
| index | field(s) | nDCG@10 | J@10 | R@1k | run file | checksum | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | abstract | query+question | 0.3522 | 0.5371 | 0.6601 | [download] | 9cdea30a3881f9e60d3c61a890b094bd |
| 2 | abstract | UDel qgen | 0.3781 | 0.5371 | 0.6485 | [download] | 1e1bcdf623f69799a2b1b2982f53c23d |
| 3 | full-text | query+question | 0.2070 | 0.4286 | 0.5953 | [download] | 6d704c60cc2cf134430c36ec2a0a3faa |
| 4 | full-text | UDel qgen | 0.3123 | 0.4229 | 0.6517 | [download] | 352a8b35a0626da21cab284bddb2e4e5 |
| 5 | paragraph | query+question | 0.2772 | 0.4400 | 0.7248 | [download] | b48c9ffb3cf9b35269ca9321ac39e758 |
| 6 | paragraph | UDel qgen | 0.3353 | 0.4343 | 0.7196 | [download] | 580fd34fbbda855dd09e1cb94467cb19 |
| 7 | - | reciprocal rank fusion(1, 3, 5) | 0.3297 | 0.4657 | 0.7561 | [download] | 2a131517308d088c3f55afa0b8d5bb04 |
| 8 | - | reciprocal rank fusion(2, 4, 6) | 0.3679 | 0.4829 | 0.7511 | [download] | 9760124d8cfa03a0e3aae3a4c6e32550 |
IMPORTANT NOTES!!!
- These runs are performed at
39c9a92, at the release of Anserini 0.9.1. - "UDel qgen" refers to query generator contributed by the University of Delaware (see below).
- The evaluation numbers are produced with round 1 qrels on the round 2 collection (release of 5/1).
- The above runs do not conform to NIST's residual collection guidelines. That is, those runs include documents from the round 1 qrels. If you use these runs as the basis for reranking, you must make sure you conform to the official round 2 guidelines from NIST. The reason for keeping documents from round 1 is so that it is possible to know the score distribution of relevant and non-relevant documents with respect to the new corpus.
- The above runs provide up to 10k hits for each topic (sometimes less because of deduping). A cautionary note: our experience is that choosing the top k documents to rerank has a large impact on end-to-end effectiveness. Reranking the top 100 seems to provide higher precision than top 1000, but the likely tradeoff is lower recall (although with such shallow pools currently, it's hard to tell). It is very likely the case that you don't want to rerank all 10k hits.
The final runs submitted to NIST, after removing round 1 judgments, are as follows:
| group | runtag | run file | checksum |
|---|---|---|---|
anserini |
r2.fusion1 |
[download] | 89544da0409435c74dd4f3dd5fc9dc62 |
anserini |
r2.fusion2 |
[download] | 774359c157c65bb7142d4f43b614e38f |
We discovered at the last minute that the package we used to perform reciprocal rank fusion trimmed runs to 1000 hits per topic. Thus the final submitted runs have less than 1000 hits per topic after removal of round 1 judgments.
Exact commands for replicating these runs are found further down on this page.
(Updates 2020/05/26) The effectiveness of the Anserini baselines according to official round 2 judgments from NIST:
| group | runtag | nDCG@10 | Judged@10 | Recall@1000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
anserini |
r2.fusion1 |
0.4827 | 0.9543 | 0.6273 |
anserini |
r2.fusion2 |
0.5553 | 0.9743 | 0.6630 |
These are runs that can be easily replicated with Anserini, from pre-built indexes available here (version from 2020/04/10, the official corpus used in round 1). They were prepared after round 1, and so we can report effectiveness results.
| index | field(s) | nDCG@10 | Judged@10 | Recall@1000 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | abstract | query | 0.4100 | 0.8267 | 0.5279 |
| 2 | abstract | question | 0.5179 | 0.9833 | 0.6313 |
| 3 | abstract | query+question | 0.5514 | 0.9833 | 0.6989 |
| 4 | abstract | query+question+narrative | 0.5294 | 0.9333 | 0.6929 |
| 5 | abstract | UDel query generator | 0.5824 | 0.9567 | 0.6927 |
| 6 | abstract | Covid19QueryGenerator |
0.4520 | 0.6500 | 0.5061 |
| 7 | full-text | query | 0.3900 | 0.7433 | 0.6277 |
| 8 | full-text | question | 0.3439 | 0.9267 | 0.6389 |
| 9 | full-text | query+question | 0.4064 | 0.9367 | 0.6714 |
| 10 | full-text | query+question+narrative | 0.3280 | 0.7567 | 0.6591 |
| 11 | full-text | UDel query generator | 0.5407 | 0.9067 | 0.7214 |
| 12 | full-text | Covid19QueryGenerator |
0.2434 | 0.5233 | 0.5692 |
| 13 | paragraph | query | 0.4302 | 0.8400 | 0.4327 |
| 14 | paragraph | question | 0.4410 | 0.9167 | 0.5111 |
| 15 | paragraph | query+question | 0.5450 | 0.9733 | 0.5743 |
| 16 | paragraph | query+question+narrative | 0.4899 | 0.8967 | 0.5918 |
| 17 | paragraph | UDel query generator | 0.5544 | 0.9200 | 0.5640 |
| 18 | paragraph | Covid19QueryGenerator |
0.3180 | 0.5333 | 0.3552 |
| 19 | - | reciprocal rank fusion(3, 9, 15) | 0.5716 | 0.9867 | 0.8117 |
| 20 | - | reciprocal rank fusion(5, 11, 17) | 0.6019 | 0.9733 | 0.8121 |
IMPORTANT NOTE: These results cannot be replicated using the indexer at HEAD because the indexing code has changed since the time the above indexes were generated.
The results are only replicable with the state of the indexer at the time of submission of TREC-COVID round 1 (which were conducted with the above indexes).
Since it is not feasible to rerun and reevaluate with every indexer change, we have decided to perform all round 1 experiments only against the above indexes.
For more discussion, see issue #1154; another major indexer change was #1101, which substantively changes the full-text and paragraph indexes.
The "UDel query generator" condition represents the query generator from run udel_fang_run3, contributed to the repo as part of commit 0d4bcd5 via #1142.
Ablation analyses by lukuang revealed that the query generator provides the greatest contribution, and results above exceed udel_fang_run3 (thus making exact replication unnecessary).
For reference, the best automatic run is run sab20.1.meta.docs with nDCG@10 0.6080.
Why report nDCG@10 and Recall@1000? The first is one of the metrics used by the organizers. Given the pool depth of seven, nDCG@10 should be okay-ish, from the perspective of missing judgments, and nDCG is better than P@k since it captures relevance grades. Average precision is not included intentionally because of the shallow judgment pool, and hence likely to be very noisy. Recall@1000 captures the upper bound potential of downstream rerankers. Note that recall under the paragraph index isn't very good because of duplicates. Multiple paragraphs from the same article are retrieved, and duplicates are discarded; we start with top 1k hits, but end up with far fewer results per topic.
Caveats:
- These runs represent, essentially, testing on training data. Beware of generalization or lack thereof.
- Beware of unjudged documents.
Exact commands for replicating these runs are found further down on this page.
Here are the replication commands for the individual runs.
First, download the pre-built indexes using our script:
python src/main/python/trec-covid/download_indexes.py --date 2020-05-01
Abstract runs:
target/appassembler/bin/SearchCollection -index indexes/lucene-index-cord19-abstract-2020-05-01 \
-topicreader Covid -topics src/main/resources/topics-and-qrels/topics.covid-round2.xml -topicfield query+question \
-output runs/anserini.covid-r2.abstract.qq.bm25.txt -runtag anserini.covid-r2.abstract.qq.bm25.txt \
-removedups -bm25 -hits 10000
target/appassembler/bin/SearchCollection -index indexes/lucene-index-cord19-abstract-2020-05-01 \
-topicreader Covid -topics src/main/resources/topics-and-qrels/topics.covid-round2-udel.xml -topicfield query \
-output runs/anserini.covid-r2.abstract.qdel.bm25.txt -runtag anserini.covid-r2.abstract.qdel.bm25.txt \
-removedups -bm25 -hits 10000
tools/eval/trec_eval.9.0.4/trec_eval -c -M1000 -m all_trec src/main/resources/topics-and-qrels/qrels.covid-round1.txt runs/anserini.covid-r2.abstract.qq.bm25.txt | egrep '(ndcg_cut_10 |recall_1000 )'
tools/eval/trec_eval.9.0.4/trec_eval -c -M1000 -m all_trec src/main/resources/topics-and-qrels/qrels.covid-round1.txt runs/anserini.covid-r2.abstract.qdel.bm25.txt | egrep '(ndcg_cut_10 |recall_1000 )'
python tools/eval/measure_judged.py --qrels src/main/resources/topics-and-qrels/qrels.covid-round1.txt --cutoffs 10 --run runs/anserini.covid-r2.abstract.qq.bm25.txt
python tools/eval/measure_judged.py --qrels src/main/resources/topics-and-qrels/qrels.covid-round1.txt --cutoffs 10 --run runs/anserini.covid-r2.abstract.qdel.bm25.txt
Full-text runs:
target/appassembler/bin/SearchCollection -index indexes/lucene-index-cord19-full-text-2020-05-01 \
-topicreader Covid -topics src/main/resources/topics-and-qrels/topics.covid-round2.xml -topicfield query+question \
-output runs/anserini.covid-r2.full-text.qq.bm25.txt -runtag anserini.covid-r2.full-text.qq.bm25.txt \
-removedups -bm25 -hits 10000
target/appassembler/bin/SearchCollection -index indexes/lucene-index-cord19-full-text-2020-05-01 \
-topicreader Covid -topics src/main/resources/topics-and-qrels/topics.covid-round2-udel.xml -topicfield query \
-output runs/anserini.covid-r2.full-text.qdel.bm25.txt -runtag anserini.covid-r2.full-text.qdel.bm25.txt \
-removedups -bm25 -hits 10000
tools/eval/trec_eval.9.0.4/trec_eval -c -M1000 -m all_trec src/main/resources/topics-and-qrels/qrels.covid-round1.txt runs/anserini.covid-r2.full-text.qq.bm25.txt | egrep '(ndcg_cut_10 |recall_1000 )'
tools/eval/trec_eval.9.0.4/trec_eval -c -M1000 -m all_trec src/main/resources/topics-and-qrels/qrels.covid-round1.txt runs/anserini.covid-r2.full-text.qdel.bm25.txt | egrep '(ndcg_cut_10 |recall_1000 )'
python tools/eval/measure_judged.py --qrels src/main/resources/topics-and-qrels/qrels.covid-round1.txt --cutoffs 10 --run runs/anserini.covid-r2.full-text.qq.bm25.txt
python tools/eval/measure_judged.py --qrels src/main/resources/topics-and-qrels/qrels.covid-round1.txt --cutoffs 10 --run runs/anserini.covid-r2.full-text.qdel.bm25.txt
Paragraph runs:
target/appassembler/bin/SearchCollection -index indexes/lucene-index-cord19-paragraph-2020-05-01 \
-topicreader Covid -topics src/main/resources/topics-and-qrels/topics.covid-round2.xml -topicfield query+question \
-output runs/anserini.covid-r2.paragraph.qq.bm25.txt -runtag anserini.covid-r2.paragraph.qq.bm25.txt \
-selectMaxPassage -bm25 -hits 10000
target/appassembler/bin/SearchCollection -index indexes/lucene-index-cord19-paragraph-2020-05-01 \
-topicreader Covid -topics src/main/resources/topics-and-qrels/topics.covid-round2-udel.xml -topicfield query \
-output runs/anserini.covid-r2.paragraph.qdel.bm25.txt -runtag anserini.covid-r2.paragraph.qdel.bm25.txt \
-selectMaxPassage -bm25 -hits 10000
tools/eval/trec_eval.9.0.4/trec_eval -c -M1000 -m all_trec src/main/resources/topics-and-qrels/qrels.covid-round1.txt runs/anserini.covid-r2.paragraph.qq.bm25.txt | egrep '(ndcg_cut_10 |recall_1000 )'
tools/eval/trec_eval.9.0.4/trec_eval -c -M1000 -m all_trec src/main/resources/topics-and-qrels/qrels.covid-round1.txt runs/anserini.covid-r2.paragraph.qdel.bm25.txt | egrep '(ndcg_cut_10 |recall_1000 )'
python tools/eval/measure_judged.py --qrels src/main/resources/topics-and-qrels/qrels.covid-round1.txt --cutoffs 10 --run runs/anserini.covid-r2.paragraph.qq.bm25.txt
python tools/eval/measure_judged.py --qrels src/main/resources/topics-and-qrels/qrels.covid-round1.txt --cutoffs 10 --run runs/anserini.covid-r2.paragraph.qdel.bm25.txt
We've written a convenience script to generate fusion runs that wraps trectools (v0.0.43):
python src/main/python/fusion.py --method RRF --out runs/anserini.covid-r2.fusion1.txt \
--runs runs/anserini.covid-r2.abstract.qq.bm25.txt runs/anserini.covid-r2.full-text.qq.bm25.txt runs/anserini.covid-r2.paragraph.qq.bm25.txt
python src/main/python/fusion.py --method RRF --out runs/anserini.covid-r2.fusion2.txt \
--runs runs/anserini.covid-r2.abstract.qdel.bm25.txt runs/anserini.covid-r2.full-text.qdel.bm25.txt runs/anserini.covid-r2.paragraph.qdel.bm25.txtAnd to evaluate the fusion runs:
tools/eval/trec_eval.9.0.4/trec_eval -c -M1000 -m all_trec src/main/resources/topics-and-qrels/qrels.covid-round1.txt runs/anserini.covid-r2.fusion1.txt | egrep '(ndcg_cut_10 |recall_1000 )'
tools/eval/trec_eval.9.0.4/trec_eval -c -M1000 -m all_trec src/main/resources/topics-and-qrels/qrels.covid-round1.txt runs/anserini.covid-r2.fusion2.txt | egrep '(ndcg_cut_10 |recall_1000 )'
python tools/eval/measure_judged.py --qrels src/main/resources/topics-and-qrels/qrels.covid-round1.txt --cutoffs 10 --run runs/anserini.covid-r2.fusion1.txt
python tools/eval/measure_judged.py --qrels src/main/resources/topics-and-qrels/qrels.covid-round1.txt --cutoffs 10 --run runs/anserini.covid-r2.fusion2.txtTo prepare the final runs for submission (removing round 1 judgments):
python tools/scripts/filter_run_with_qrels.py --discard --qrels src/main/resources/topics-and-qrels/qrels.covid-round1.txt \
--input runs/anserini.covid-r2.fusion1.txt --output runs/anserini.r2.fusion1.txt --runtag r2.fusion1
python tools/scripts/filter_run_with_qrels.py --discard --qrels src/main/resources/topics-and-qrels/qrels.covid-round1.txt \
--input runs/anserini.covid-r2.fusion2.txt --output runs/anserini.r2.fusion2.txt --runtag r2.fusion2Evaluating runs with round 2 judgments:
tools/eval/trec_eval.9.0.4/trec_eval -c -M1000 -m all_trec src/main/resources/topics-and-qrels/qrels.covid-round2.txt runs/anserini.r2.fusion1.txt | egrep '(ndcg_cut_10 |recall_1000 )'
tools/eval/trec_eval.9.0.4/trec_eval -c -M1000 -m all_trec src/main/resources/topics-and-qrels/qrels.covid-round2.txt runs/anserini.r2.fusion2.txt | egrep '(ndcg_cut_10 |recall_1000 )'
python tools/eval/measure_judged.py --qrels src/main/resources/topics-and-qrels/qrels.covid-round2.txt --cutoffs 10 --run runs/anserini.r2.fusion1.txt
python tools/eval/measure_judged.py --qrels src/main/resources/topics-and-qrels/qrels.covid-round2.txt --cutoffs 10 --run runs/anserini.r2.fusion2.txtFirst, download the pre-built indexes using our script:
python src/main/python/trec-covid/download_indexes.py --date 2020-04-10
Here are the commands to generate the runs on the abstract index:
target/appassembler/bin/SearchCollection -index indexes/lucene-index-covid-2020-04-10 \
-topicreader Covid -topics src/main/resources/topics-and-qrels/topics.covid-round1.xml -topicfield query -removedups \
-bm25 -output runs/run.covid-r1.abstract.query.bm25.txt
target/appassembler/bin/SearchCollection -index indexes/lucene-index-covid-2020-04-10 \
-topicreader Covid -topics src/main/resources/topics-and-qrels/topics.covid-round1.xml -topicfield question -removedups \
-bm25 -output runs/run.covid-r1.abstract.question.bm25.txt
target/appassembler/bin/SearchCollection -index indexes/lucene-index-covid-2020-04-10 \
-topicreader Covid -topics src/main/resources/topics-and-qrels/topics.covid-round1.xml -topicfield query+question -removedups \
-bm25 -output runs/run.covid-r1.abstract.query+question.bm25.txt
target/appassembler/bin/SearchCollection -index indexes/lucene-index-covid-2020-04-10 \
-topicreader Covid -topics src/main/resources/topics-and-qrels/topics.covid-round1.xml -topicfield query+question+narrative -removedups \
-bm25 -output runs/run.covid-r1.abstract.query+question+narrative.bm25.txt
target/appassembler/bin/SearchCollection -index indexes/lucene-index-covid-2020-04-10 \
-topicreader Covid -topics src/main/resources/topics-and-qrels/topics.covid-round1-udel.xml -topicfield query -removedups \
-bm25 -output runs/run.covid-r1.abstract.query-udel.bm25.txt
target/appassembler/bin/SearchCollection -index indexes/lucene-index-covid-2020-04-10 \
-topicreader Covid -topics src/main/resources/topics-and-qrels/topics.covid-round1.xml -topicfield query -querygenerator Covid19QueryGenerator -removedups \
-bm25 -output runs/run.covid-r1.abstract.query-covid19.bm25.txtHere are the commands to evaluate results on the abstract index:
tools/eval/trec_eval.9.0.4/trec_eval -c -M1000 -m all_trec src/main/resources/topics-and-qrels/qrels.covid-round1.txt runs/run.covid-r1.abstract.query.bm25.txt | egrep '(ndcg_cut_10 |recall_1000 )'
tools/eval/trec_eval.9.0.4/trec_eval -c -M1000 -m all_trec src/main/resources/topics-and-qrels/qrels.covid-round1.txt runs/run.covid-r1.abstract.question.bm25.txt | egrep '(ndcg_cut_10 |recall_1000 )'
tools/eval/trec_eval.9.0.4/trec_eval -c -M1000 -m all_trec src/main/resources/topics-and-qrels/qrels.covid-round1.txt runs/run.covid-r1.abstract.query+question.bm25.txt | egrep '(ndcg_cut_10 |recall_1000 )'
tools/eval/trec_eval.9.0.4/trec_eval -c -M1000 -m all_trec src/main/resources/topics-and-qrels/qrels.covid-round1.txt runs/run.covid-r1.abstract.query+question+narrative.bm25.txt | egrep '(ndcg_cut_10 |recall_1000 )'
tools/eval/trec_eval.9.0.4/trec_eval -c -M1000 -m all_trec src/main/resources/topics-and-qrels/qrels.covid-round1.txt runs/run.covid-r1.abstract.query-udel.bm25.txt | egrep '(ndcg_cut_10 |recall_1000 )'
tools/eval/trec_eval.9.0.4/trec_eval -c -M1000 -m all_trec src/main/resources/topics-and-qrels/qrels.covid-round1.txt runs/run.covid-r1.abstract.query-covid19.bm25.txt | egrep '(ndcg_cut_10 |recall_1000 )'
python tools/eval/measure_judged.py --qrels src/main/resources/topics-and-qrels/qrels.covid-round1.txt --cutoffs 10 --run runs/run.covid-r1.abstract.query.bm25.txt
python tools/eval/measure_judged.py --qrels src/main/resources/topics-and-qrels/qrels.covid-round1.txt --cutoffs 10 --run runs/run.covid-r1.abstract.question.bm25.txt
python tools/eval/measure_judged.py --qrels src/main/resources/topics-and-qrels/qrels.covid-round1.txt --cutoffs 10 --run runs/run.covid-r1.abstract.query+question.bm25.txt
python tools/eval/measure_judged.py --qrels src/main/resources/topics-and-qrels/qrels.covid-round1.txt --cutoffs 10 --run runs/run.covid-r1.abstract.query+question+narrative.bm25.txt
python tools/eval/measure_judged.py --qrels src/main/resources/topics-and-qrels/qrels.covid-round1.txt --cutoffs 10 --run runs/run.covid-r1.abstract.query-udel.bm25.txt
python tools/eval/measure_judged.py --qrels src/main/resources/topics-and-qrels/qrels.covid-round1.txt --cutoffs 10 --run runs/run.covid-r1.abstract.query-covid19.bm25.txtHere are the commands to generate the runs on the full-text index:
target/appassembler/bin/SearchCollection -index indexes/lucene-index-covid-full-text-2020-04-10 \
-topicreader Covid -topics src/main/resources/topics-and-qrels/topics.covid-round1.xml -topicfield query -removedups \
-bm25 -output runs/run.covid-r1.full-text.query.bm25.txt
target/appassembler/bin/SearchCollection -index indexes/lucene-index-covid-full-text-2020-04-10 \
-topicreader Covid -topics src/main/resources/topics-and-qrels/topics.covid-round1.xml -topicfield question -removedups \
-bm25 -output runs/run.covid-r1.full-text.question.bm25.txt
target/appassembler/bin/SearchCollection -index indexes/lucene-index-covid-full-text-2020-04-10 \
-topicreader Covid -topics src/main/resources/topics-and-qrels/topics.covid-round1.xml -topicfield query+question -removedups \
-bm25 -output runs/run.covid-r1.full-text.query+question.bm25.txt
target/appassembler/bin/SearchCollection -index indexes/lucene-index-covid-full-text-2020-04-10 \
-topicreader Covid -topics src/main/resources/topics-and-qrels/topics.covid-round1.xml -topicfield query+question+narrative -removedups \
-bm25 -output runs/run.covid-r1.full-text.query+question+narrative.bm25.txt
target/appassembler/bin/SearchCollection -index indexes/lucene-index-covid-full-text-2020-04-10 \
-topicreader Covid -topics src/main/resources/topics-and-qrels/topics.covid-round1-udel.xml -topicfield query -removedups \
-bm25 -output runs/run.covid-r1.full-text.query-udel.bm25.txt
target/appassembler/bin/SearchCollection -index indexes/lucene-index-covid-full-text-2020-04-10 \
-topicreader Covid -topics src/main/resources/topics-and-qrels/topics.covid-round1.xml -topicfield query -querygenerator Covid19QueryGenerator -removedups \
-bm25 -output runs/run.covid-r1.full-text.query-covid19.bm25.txtHere are the commands to evaluate results on the full-text index:
tools/eval/trec_eval.9.0.4/trec_eval -c -M1000 -m all_trec src/main/resources/topics-and-qrels/qrels.covid-round1.txt runs/run.covid-r1.full-text.query.bm25.txt | egrep '(ndcg_cut_10 |recall_1000 )'
tools/eval/trec_eval.9.0.4/trec_eval -c -M1000 -m all_trec src/main/resources/topics-and-qrels/qrels.covid-round1.txt runs/run.covid-r1.full-text.question.bm25.txt | egrep '(ndcg_cut_10 |recall_1000 )'
tools/eval/trec_eval.9.0.4/trec_eval -c -M1000 -m all_trec src/main/resources/topics-and-qrels/qrels.covid-round1.txt runs/run.covid-r1.full-text.query+question.bm25.txt | egrep '(ndcg_cut_10 |recall_1000 )'
tools/eval/trec_eval.9.0.4/trec_eval -c -M1000 -m all_trec src/main/resources/topics-and-qrels/qrels.covid-round1.txt runs/run.covid-r1.full-text.query+question+narrative.bm25.txt | egrep '(ndcg_cut_10 |recall_1000 )'
tools/eval/trec_eval.9.0.4/trec_eval -c -M1000 -m all_trec src/main/resources/topics-and-qrels/qrels.covid-round1.txt runs/run.covid-r1.full-text.query-udel.bm25.txt | egrep '(ndcg_cut_10 |recall_1000 )'
tools/eval/trec_eval.9.0.4/trec_eval -c -M1000 -m all_trec src/main/resources/topics-and-qrels/qrels.covid-round1.txt runs/run.covid-r1.full-text.query-covid19.bm25.txt | egrep '(ndcg_cut_10 |recall_1000 )'
python tools/eval/measure_judged.py --qrels src/main/resources/topics-and-qrels/qrels.covid-round1.txt --cutoffs 10 --run runs/run.covid-r1.full-text.query.bm25.txt
python tools/eval/measure_judged.py --qrels src/main/resources/topics-and-qrels/qrels.covid-round1.txt --cutoffs 10 --run runs/run.covid-r1.full-text.question.bm25.txt
python tools/eval/measure_judged.py --qrels src/main/resources/topics-and-qrels/qrels.covid-round1.txt --cutoffs 10 --run runs/run.covid-r1.full-text.query+question.bm25.txt
python tools/eval/measure_judged.py --qrels src/main/resources/topics-and-qrels/qrels.covid-round1.txt --cutoffs 10 --run runs/run.covid-r1.full-text.query+question+narrative.bm25.txt
python tools/eval/measure_judged.py --qrels src/main/resources/topics-and-qrels/qrels.covid-round1.txt --cutoffs 10 --run runs/run.covid-r1.full-text.query-udel.bm25.txt
python tools/eval/measure_judged.py --qrels src/main/resources/topics-and-qrels/qrels.covid-round1.txt --cutoffs 10 --run runs/run.covid-r1.full-text.query-covid19.bm25.txtHere are the commands to generate the runs on the paragraph index:
target/appassembler/bin/SearchCollection -index indexes/lucene-index-covid-paragraph-2020-04-10 \
-topicreader Covid -topics src/main/resources/topics-and-qrels/topics.covid-round1.xml -topicfield query \
-selectMaxPassage -bm25 -output runs/run.covid-r1.paragraph.query.bm25.txt
target/appassembler/bin/SearchCollection -index indexes/lucene-index-covid-paragraph-2020-04-10 \
-topicreader Covid -topics src/main/resources/topics-and-qrels/topics.covid-round1.xml -topicfield question \
-selectMaxPassage -bm25 -output runs/run.covid-r1.paragraph.question.bm25.txt
target/appassembler/bin/SearchCollection -index indexes/lucene-index-covid-paragraph-2020-04-10 \
-topicreader Covid -topics src/main/resources/topics-and-qrels/topics.covid-round1.xml -topicfield query+question \
-selectMaxPassage -bm25 -output runs/run.covid-r1.paragraph.query+question.bm25.txt
target/appassembler/bin/SearchCollection -index indexes/lucene-index-covid-paragraph-2020-04-10 \
-topicreader Covid -topics src/main/resources/topics-and-qrels/topics.covid-round1.xml -topicfield query+question+narrative \
-selectMaxPassage -bm25 -output runs/run.covid-r1.paragraph.query+question+narrative.bm25.txt
target/appassembler/bin/SearchCollection -index indexes/lucene-index-covid-paragraph-2020-04-10 \
-topicreader Covid -topics src/main/resources/topics-and-qrels/topics.covid-round1-udel.xml -topicfield query \
-selectMaxPassage -bm25 -output runs/run.covid-r1.paragraph.query-udel.bm25.txt
target/appassembler/bin/SearchCollection -index indexes/lucene-index-covid-paragraph-2020-04-10 \
-topicreader Covid -topics src/main/resources/topics-and-qrels/topics.covid-round1.xml -topicfield query -querygenerator Covid19QueryGenerator \
-selectMaxPassage -bm25 -output runs/run.covid-r1.paragraph.query-covid19.bm25.txtHere are the commands to evaluate results on the paragraph index:
tools/eval/trec_eval.9.0.4/trec_eval -c -M1000 -m all_trec src/main/resources/topics-and-qrels/qrels.covid-round1.txt runs/run.covid-r1.paragraph.query.bm25.txt | egrep '(ndcg_cut_10 |recall_1000 )'
tools/eval/trec_eval.9.0.4/trec_eval -c -M1000 -m all_trec src/main/resources/topics-and-qrels/qrels.covid-round1.txt runs/run.covid-r1.paragraph.question.bm25.txt | egrep '(ndcg_cut_10 |recall_1000 )'
tools/eval/trec_eval.9.0.4/trec_eval -c -M1000 -m all_trec src/main/resources/topics-and-qrels/qrels.covid-round1.txt runs/run.covid-r1.paragraph.query+question.bm25.txt | egrep '(ndcg_cut_10 |recall_1000 )'
tools/eval/trec_eval.9.0.4/trec_eval -c -M1000 -m all_trec src/main/resources/topics-and-qrels/qrels.covid-round1.txt runs/run.covid-r1.paragraph.query+question+narrative.bm25.txt | egrep '(ndcg_cut_10 |recall_1000 )'
tools/eval/trec_eval.9.0.4/trec_eval -c -M1000 -m all_trec src/main/resources/topics-and-qrels/qrels.covid-round1.txt runs/run.covid-r1.paragraph.query-udel.bm25.txt | egrep '(ndcg_cut_10 |recall_1000 )'
tools/eval/trec_eval.9.0.4/trec_eval -c -M1000 -m all_trec src/main/resources/topics-and-qrels/qrels.covid-round1.txt runs/run.covid-r1.paragraph.query-covid19.bm25.txt | egrep '(ndcg_cut_10 |recall_1000 )'
python tools/eval/measure_judged.py --qrels src/main/resources/topics-and-qrels/qrels.covid-round1.txt --cutoffs 10 --run runs/run.covid-r1.paragraph.query.bm25.txt
python tools/eval/measure_judged.py --qrels src/main/resources/topics-and-qrels/qrels.covid-round1.txt --cutoffs 10 --run runs/run.covid-r1.paragraph.question.bm25.txt
python tools/eval/measure_judged.py --qrels src/main/resources/topics-and-qrels/qrels.covid-round1.txt --cutoffs 10 --run runs/run.covid-r1.paragraph.query+question.bm25.txt
python tools/eval/measure_judged.py --qrels src/main/resources/topics-and-qrels/qrels.covid-round1.txt --cutoffs 10 --run runs/run.covid-r1.paragraph.query+question+narrative.bm25.txt
python tools/eval/measure_judged.py --qrels src/main/resources/topics-and-qrels/qrels.covid-round1.txt --cutoffs 10 --run runs/run.covid-r1.paragraph.query-udel.bm25.txt
python tools/eval/measure_judged.py --qrels src/main/resources/topics-and-qrels/qrels.covid-round1.txt --cutoffs 10 --run runs/run.covid-r1.paragraph.query-covid19.bm25.txtWe've written a convenience script to generate fusion runs that wraps trectools (v0.0.43):
python src/main/python/fusion.py --method RRF --out runs/run.covid-r1.fusion1.txt \
--runs runs/run.covid-r1.abstract.query+question.bm25.txt runs/run.covid-r1.full-text.query+question.bm25.txt runs/run.covid-r1.paragraph.query+question.bm25.txt
python src/main/python/fusion.py --method RRF --out runs/run.covid-r1.fusion2.txt \
--runs runs/run.covid-r1.abstract.query-udel.bm25.txt runs/run.covid-r1.full-text.query-udel.bm25.txt runs/run.covid-r1.paragraph.query-udel.bm25.txtAnd to evalute the fusion runs:
tools/eval/trec_eval.9.0.4/trec_eval -c -M1000 -m all_trec src/main/resources/topics-and-qrels/qrels.covid-round1.txt runs/run.covid-r1.fusion1.txt | egrep '(ndcg_cut_10 |recall_1000 )'
tools/eval/trec_eval.9.0.4/trec_eval -c -M1000 -m all_trec src/main/resources/topics-and-qrels/qrels.covid-round1.txt runs/run.covid-r1.fusion2.txt | egrep '(ndcg_cut_10 |recall_1000 )'
python tools/eval/measure_judged.py --qrels src/main/resources/topics-and-qrels/qrels.covid-round1.txt --cutoffs 10 --run runs/run.covid-r1.fusion1.txt
python tools/eval/measure_judged.py --qrels src/main/resources/topics-and-qrels/qrels.covid-round1.txt --cutoffs 10 --run runs/run.covid-r1.fusion2.txt