Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove pf_ring from code and docs in 6.0 #4585

Closed
tsg opened this issue Jun 30, 2017 · 0 comments
Closed

Remove pf_ring from code and docs in 6.0 #4585

tsg opened this issue Jun 30, 2017 · 0 comments

Comments

@tsg
Copy link
Contributor

tsg commented Jun 30, 2017

We already mention in the docs that pf_ring is not supported, but it seems that it's currently completely broken: https://discuss.elastic.co/t/pf-ring-on-packetbeat-error/91356

Since this is something we don't intend to support, I think best choice is to remove it for real.

@tsg tsg mentioned this issue Jul 4, 2017
tsg pushed a commit to tsg/beats that referenced this issue Jul 4, 2017
The PFring sniffer in Packetbeat is officially unsupported for a longer time,
because it depends on a kernel module and because we don't have a good way of
testing it,
but we left in the code and docs for the people that would like to compile it
themselves. However, it appears that it's broken for a long time (elastic#2800), so this PR
removes it from code and docs.

Closes elastic#4585, elastic#2800.
@urso urso closed this as completed in #4608 Jul 5, 2017
urso pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jul 5, 2017
The PFring sniffer in Packetbeat is officially unsupported for a longer time,
because it depends on a kernel module and because we don't have a good way of
testing it,
but we left in the code and docs for the people that would like to compile it
themselves. However, it appears that it's broken for a long time (#2800), so this PR
removes it from code and docs.

Closes #4585, #2800.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant