Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Follow up renaming of ML modules #10723

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 13, 2019

Conversation

kvch
Copy link
Contributor

@kvch kvch commented Feb 13, 2019

Two renamings has happened which lead to the problem:

  • the Filebeat module apache2 has been renamed to apache
  • the ID of ML modules has been suffixed with _ecs

As it is still a fragile solution, I have opened an issue for the ML team to add the possibility of listing all available modules with additional meta data: elastic/kibana#30934

@kvch kvch added review Filebeat Filebeat labels Feb 13, 2019
@kvch kvch requested a review from a team as a code owner February 13, 2019 11:33
@kvch kvch removed the request for review from a team February 13, 2019 11:39
@kvch kvch added the needs_backport PR is waiting to be backported to other branches. label Feb 13, 2019
@ruflin
Copy link
Contributor

ruflin commented Feb 13, 2019

++ on having a more reliable solution long term.

@ruflin ruflin mentioned this pull request Feb 13, 2019
ruflin added a commit to ruflin/beats that referenced this pull request Feb 13, 2019
@kvch
Copy link
Contributor Author

kvch commented Feb 13, 2019

All related tests are green in Travis, Jenkins is completely green, so merging.

@kvch kvch merged commit 7542db1 into elastic:master Feb 13, 2019
kvch added a commit to kvch/beats that referenced this pull request Feb 13, 2019
Two renamings has happened which lead to the problem:

* the Filebeat module apache2 has been renamed to apache
* the ID of ML modules has been suffixed with _ecs

As it is still a fragile solution, I have opened an issue for the ML team to add the possibility of listing all available modules with additional meta data: elastic/kibana#30934
(cherry picked from commit 7542db1)
@kvch kvch added v7.0.0 and removed needs_backport PR is waiting to be backported to other branches. labels Feb 13, 2019
kvch added a commit to kvch/beats that referenced this pull request Feb 13, 2019
Two renamings has happened which lead to the problem:

* the Filebeat module apache2 has been renamed to apache
* the ID of ML modules has been suffixed with _ecs

As it is still a fragile solution, I have opened an issue for the ML team to add the possibility of listing all available modules with additional meta data: elastic/kibana#30934
(cherry picked from commit 7542db1)
@kvch kvch added the v7.2.0 label Feb 13, 2019
kvch added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 14, 2019
Two renamings has happened which lead to the problem:

* the Filebeat module apache2 has been renamed to apache
* the ID of ML modules has been suffixed with _ecs

As it is still a fragile solution, I have opened an issue for the ML team to add the possibility of listing all available modules with additional meta data: elastic/kibana#30934
(cherry picked from commit 7542db1)
kvch added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 14, 2019
Two renamings has happened which lead to the problem:

* the Filebeat module apache2 has been renamed to apache
* the ID of ML modules has been suffixed with _ecs

As it is still a fragile solution, I have opened an issue for the ML team to add the possibility of listing all available modules with additional meta data: elastic/kibana#30934
(cherry picked from commit 7542db1)
@sophiec20
Copy link
Contributor

++ on having a more reliable solution long term.

As an alternative and/or complementary option to listing available ML modules, would it also be useful to check the return from the call to setup the ML module?

@kvch
Copy link
Contributor Author

kvch commented Feb 20, 2019

I am sorry, I am not sure I follow. Do you mean that we could try to setup ML for every Filebeat module to see which ones are available?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants