-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
CI Hotfix #17358
Merged
Merged
CI Hotfix #17358
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
urso
commented
Mar 31, 2020
steps { | ||
makeTarget("Docs", "docs") | ||
} | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we don't need this. The elasticsearch-ci/docs test is much more complete.
kuisathaverat
approved these changes
Mar 31, 2020
5 tasks
urso
pushed a commit
to urso/beats
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 31, 2020
The Jenkinsfile rules prevent many tests that should have been run to execute. This changes tries to unify rules between the Jenkinsfile and travis setup a little more. (cherry picked from commit c2a9055)
urso
pushed a commit
to urso/beats
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 31, 2020
The Jenkinsfile rules prevent many tests that should have been run to execute. This changes tries to unify rules between the Jenkinsfile and travis setup a little more. (cherry picked from commit c2a9055)
5 tasks
urso
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 31, 2020
The Jenkinsfile rules prevent many tests that should have been run to execute. This changes tries to unify rules between the Jenkinsfile and travis setup a little more. (cherry picked from commit c2a9055)
urso
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 31, 2020
The Jenkinsfile rules prevent many tests that should have been run to execute. This changes tries to unify rules between the Jenkinsfile and travis setup a little more. (cherry picked from commit c2a9055)
leweafan
pushed a commit
to leweafan/beats
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 28, 2023
The Jenkinsfile rules prevent many tests that should have been run to execute. This changes tries to unify rules between the Jenkinsfile and travis setup a little more. (cherry picked from commit 01ca0ae)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What does this PR do?
The Jenkinsfile rules prevent many tests that should have been run to
execute. This changes tries to unify rules between the Jenkinsfile and
travis setup a little more.
Example PR that should have triggered almost all CI jobs, but they've all been skipped: #17332
Why is it important?
I noticed that in some PRs required tests have not been run at all by Jenkins. This is an attempt to applying similar rules to Jenkinsfiles and Travis setup.
Checklist
~~- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
CHANGELOG.next.asciidoc
orCHANGELOG-developer.next.asciidoc
.~~
Related issues