Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adopt the new schema approach for the MongoDb module #2040

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 19, 2016

Conversation

tsg
Copy link
Contributor

@tsg tsg commented Jul 15, 2016

This is applying the ideas from #2034 to the MongoDB module, simplifying the
code significantly. Unfortunately, the same conversions functions cannot be applied
as is to the map[string]interface{} that we get from the mongodb driver, so I had to
reimplement them.

Besides simplifying the logic, this fixes a bug: in the previous version if an error happened on a key that was named differently from the source, the key was not removed.

This PR also refactors and generalizes the conversions schema and organizes them in two sub-packages: mapstrstr and mapstriface.

@tsg tsg added review in progress Pull request is currently in progress. labels Jul 15, 2016
@tsg tsg force-pushed the mongodb_refactor_take2 branch from 7826c78 to c6d3b29 Compare July 15, 2016 12:13
@@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
package status
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should this code be moved into the helper?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, I'm trying to find a way to organize these in a way that makes sense. We basically have two sets of convertors. One set that work on map[string]string (one level deep) and one that work on map[string]interface{} (nested). I'm thinking to have something like:

helper/
  schema.go
  mapstrstr/
    ...
  mapstriface/
    ...

The names are not great, I know. We could also either move the whole thing one level down under helper/schema/ or replace helper with schema as there are no other helpers.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1 on moving it to schema as a top level package as this is so critical to building metricsets. Also then we can use s.* instead of h.* which somehow feels more logical. Or would you use the full package name every time?

@tsg
Copy link
Contributor Author

tsg commented Jul 18, 2016

@ruflin @urso: I did all the refactoring I had planned, but it turned out to be quite a long PR. I could try splitting it in smaller ones if you think it's worth it. Please have a look, and I can cleanup the history afterwards.

"workers": common.MapStr{
"busy": h.Int("BusyWorkers"),
"idle": h.Int("IdleWorkers"),
schema_ = schema.Schema{
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Little bit odd naming convention, especially as it will also be used by others. Perhaps going with s and using c for the s. C would stand for conversion. BTW: if we use . for the include mapstrstr. Never tried it but that should make it part of the same namespace. So we could use it without prefix.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So we'll have s.Schema and c.Int, right? Yeah, that could also work.

I'd prefer not going to dot imports, those are usually more messy and upset linters.

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yeah, please no dot imports if possible. I'd also put all functions/types used to define a schema into one package (or at least re-export).

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All in one package wouldn't be possible without significant repetition between mapstrstr and mapstriface. What do you mean by re-export. I tried something like type Schema schema.Schema but that doesn't really work because the resulting type is not compatible.

@ruflin
Copy link
Contributor

ruflin commented Jul 18, 2016

LGTM. So minor naming comments.

Huge step forward. That will make creating metricsets even easier.

@ruflin
Copy link
Contributor

ruflin commented Jul 18, 2016

jenkins, retest it

@tsg tsg force-pushed the mongodb_refactor_take2 branch from f68dda5 to 2ee410b Compare July 18, 2016 21:28
"testErrorBool": "yes", // invalid bool
}

schema_ := schema.Schema{
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Still schema_ but not critical as it is part of the tests.

Tudor Golubenco added 2 commits July 19, 2016 09:56
This is applying the ideas from elastic#2034 to the MongoDB module,
simplifying the code significantly.

Besides simplifying the logic, this fixes a bug: in the previous
version if an error happened on a key that was named differently from
the source, the key was not removed.
* Generalize the schema to work on map[string]interface{}. This drops a
 bit on the type safety but makes it applicable in more cases. In
 particular, it makes it possible to reuse the defined types and code
 in the MongoDB module.
* Added a Mapper interface for Conv and map[string]Conv. This adds type
  safety to the schema.
* Added unit tests
@tsg tsg force-pushed the mongodb_refactor_take2 branch from 2ee410b to fc76d70 Compare July 19, 2016 07:59
@tsg
Copy link
Contributor Author

tsg commented Jul 19, 2016

History cleaned up, let's wait for green. I'm preparing another PR for adding some docs to the dev guide.

@ruflin ruflin merged commit e002cd5 into elastic:master Jul 19, 2016
@tsg tsg removed the in progress Pull request is currently in progress. label Jul 19, 2016
@tsg tsg deleted the mongodb_refactor_take2 branch August 25, 2016 10:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants