Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cherry-pick #9802 to 6.x: Remove X-Pack foo Metricbeat module #9803

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 2, 2019

Conversation

sayden
Copy link
Contributor

@sayden sayden commented Dec 27, 2018

Cherry-pick of PR #9802 to 6.x branch. Original message:

The purpose of the foo module in Metricbeat X-Pack was to test the new build and test system within the x-pack/metricbeat folder.

After merging MS SQL module in X-Pack, we can already remove this dummy module.

Things that have been removed:

  • module folder and all its contents module/foo
  • References to the module and metricset in include/list.go file
  • Reference in the metricbeat.reference.yml file.

The purpose of the foo module in Metricbeat X-Pack was to test the new build and test system within the x-pack/metricbeat folder.

After merging MS SQL module in X-Pack, we can already remove this dummy module.
@ruflin
Copy link
Contributor

ruflin commented Dec 27, 2018

How did this end up in 6.x? Do we have this also in 6.6?

@sayden
Copy link
Contributor Author

sayden commented Dec 27, 2018

I was also surprised and yes, we also have it in 6.6 so I'm gonna open a new PR to remove it from there.

@ruflin
Copy link
Contributor

ruflin commented Dec 27, 2018

Yes, please also remove it from there. As we don't have any x-pack modules in 6.6 AFAIK, I wonder how this ended up here. Could you investigate as I worry that also other things potentially ended up here?

@sayden
Copy link
Contributor Author

sayden commented Dec 27, 2018

metricbeat.reference.yml with module: foo was added to master here #9242 on Nov 27 (exactly one month ago)

Few days later, ILM support was added to Master here #7963 and cherry picked to 6.x here #9418 and I guess it got into 6.6 when we did the release few days ago.

@sayden sayden requested a review from ruflin December 27, 2018 22:25
Copy link
Contributor

@ruflin ruflin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I see, seems like we missed that during the review and for some reason the reference file is not generated correctly in 6.x as otherwise make check should have detected this. Let's also remove it from 6.6.

@sayden sayden self-assigned this Dec 28, 2018
@sayden sayden merged commit ef23f3d into elastic:6.x Jan 2, 2019
@sayden sayden deleted the backport_9802_6.x branch October 29, 2021 08:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants