Allow license secret webhook to fail #1301
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Webhooks on core k8s objects are just too debilitating in case our webhook service fails. This sets the failure policy for the secret webhook to ignore to strike a balance between UX (immediate feedback) and keeping the users k8s cluster in a working state. Also we have an additional validation run on controller level so this does not allow circumventing our validation logic.
thbkrkr
approved these changes
Jul 19, 2019
artemnikitin
approved these changes
Jul 19, 2019
sebgl
approved these changes
Jul 19, 2019
Merged
sebgl
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 24, 2019
* Use the setvmmaxmapcount initcontainer by default in E2E tests (#1300) Let's keep our default defaults :) The setting is disabled explicitly for E2E tests where we enable a restricted security context. * Add docs for plugins, custom configuration files and secure settings (#1298) * Allow license secret webhook to fail (#1301) Webhooks on core k8s objects are just too debilitating in case our webhook service fails. This sets the failure policy for the secret webhook to ignore to strike a balance between UX (immediate feedback) and keeping the users k8s cluster in a working state. Also we have an additional validation run on controller level so this does not allow circumventing our validation logic. * Revert "Use the setvmmaxmapcount initcontainer by default in E2E tests (#1300)" (#1302) This reverts commit fff1526. This commit is breaking our E2E tests chain, which deploy a PodSecurityPolicy by default. Any privileged init container will not work. I'll open an issue for a longer-term fix to properly handle this. * Update quickstart (#1307) * Update the name of the secret for the elastic user * Bump the Elastic Stack version from 7.1.0 to 7.2.0 * Change Kibana readiness endpoint to return a 200 OK (#1309) The previous endpoint returned an http code 302. While this is fine for Kubernetes, some derived systems like GCP LoadBalancers mimic the container readiness check for their own readiness check. Except GCP Loadbalancers only work with status 200. It's not up to us to adapt GCP LoadBalancers to K8s, but this is a fairly trivial fix. * Fix pod_forwarder to support two part DNS names, adjust e2e http_client (#1297) * Fix pod_forwarder to support two part DNS names, adjust e2e http_client url * Revert removing .svc in e2e http_client * [DOC] Resources management and volume claim template (#1252) * Add resources and persistent volume templates documentation * Ignore resources reconciled by older controllers (#1286) * Document PodDisruptionBudget section of the ES spec (#1306) * Document PodDisruptionBudget section of the ES spec I suspect this might slightly change in the feature depending on how we handle the readiness check, so I'm keeping this doc minimal for now: * what is a PDB, briefly (with a link) * default PDB we apply * how to set a different PDB * how to disable the default PDB * Move version out from Makefile (#1312) * Add release note generation tool (#1314) * no external dependencies * inspects PRs by version label * generates structured release notes in asciidoc grouped by type label * Add console output to standalone apm sample (#1321) * Update Quickstart to 0.9.0 (#1317) * Update doc (#1319) * Update persistent storage section * Update kibana localhost url to use https * Update k8s resources names in accessing-services doc * Mention SSL browser warning * Fix bulleted list * Add CI job for nightly builds (#1248) * Move version to a file * Add CI implementation * Update VERSION * Depend on another PR for moving out version from Makefile * Update Jenkinsfile * Don't build and push operator image in bootstrap-gke (#1332) We don't need to do that anymore, since we don't use an init container based on the operator image. * Remove Docker image publishing from devops-ci (#1339) * Suppress output of certain commands from Makefile (#1342) * Document how to disable TLS (#1341) * Use new credentials for Docker registry (#1346) * Workaround controller-runtime webhook upsert bug (#1337) * Fix docs build on PR job (#1351) * Fix docs build on PR job * Cleanup workspace before doing other steps * APM: remove "output" element and add elasticsearchRef (#1345) * Don't rely on buggy metaObject Kind (#1324) * Don't rely on buggy metaObject Kind A bug in our client implementation may clear the object's Kind on certain scenarios. See kubernetes-sigs/controller-runtime#406. Let's avoid that by fixing a constant Kind returned by a method call on the resource.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Webhooks on core k8s objects are just too debilitating in case our
webhook service fails. This sets the failure policy for the secret
webhook to ignore to strike a balance between UX (immediate feedback)
and keeping the users k8s cluster in a working state. Also we have an
additional validation run on controller level so this does not allow
circumventing our validation logic.