-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 719
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix Logstash templating issue in Helm chart #8087
Conversation
Add test case. Signed-off-by: Michael Montgomery <mmontg1@gmail.com>
pipelines: {{ toYaml .Values.pipelines | nindent 4 }} | ||
{{- end }} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Imagine if the user sets both pipelines
and pipelinesRef
fields, then only pipelinesRef
will be rendered without error. What do you think about adding a validation to prevent setting both fields?
Nit: also group pipeline related bits together.
diff --git a/deploy/eck-stack/charts/eck-logstash/templates/logstash.yaml b/deploy/eck-stack/charts/eck-logstash/templates/logstash.yaml
index 3c4deb1bc..162ec317a 100644
--- a/deploy/eck-stack/charts/eck-logstash/templates/logstash.yaml
+++ b/deploy/eck-stack/charts/eck-logstash/templates/logstash.yaml
@@ -31,10 +31,6 @@ spec:
configRef:
{{- toYaml . | nindent 4 }}
{{- end }}
- {{- with .Values.pipelinesRef }}
- pipelinesRef:
- {{- toYaml . | nindent 4 }}
- {{- end }}
{{- with .Values.podTemplate }}
podTemplate:
{{- toYaml . | nindent 4 }}
@@ -43,8 +39,14 @@ spec:
monitoring:
{{- toYaml . | nindent 4 }}
{{- end }}
-
- {{- if not (.Values.pipelinesRef) }}
+ {{- if and .Values.pipelines .Values.pipelinesRef }}
+ {{- fail "pipelines and pipelinesRef are mutually exclusive!" }}
+ {{- end }}
+ {{- with .Values.pipelinesRef }}
+ pipelinesRef:
+ {{- toYaml . | nindent 4 }}
+ {{- end }}
+ {{- if .Values.pipelines }}
pipelines: {{ toYaml .Values.pipelines | nindent 4 }}
{{- end }}
volumeClaimTemplates: {{ toYaml .Values.volumeClaimTemplates | nindent 4 }}
diff --git a/deploy/eck-stack/charts/eck-logstash/values.yaml b/deploy/eck-stack/charts/eck-logstash/values.yaml
index a2d1d289a..e68694852 100644
--- a/deploy/eck-stack/charts/eck-logstash/values.yaml
+++ b/deploy/eck-stack/charts/eck-logstash/values.yaml
@@ -78,11 +78,11 @@ monitoring: {}
# namespace: observability
# The Logstash pipelines, the ECK equivalent to pipelines.yml
+# NOTE: The `pipelines` and `pipelinesRef` fields are mutually exclusive. Only one of them should be defined at a time, as using both may cause conflicts.
# ref: https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/cloud-on-k8s/current/k8s-logstash-configuration.html#k8s-logstash-pipelines
#
pipelines: []
-
-pipelinesRef: {}
+# pipelinesRef:
# secretRef:
# secretName: ''
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @thbkrkr , this makes a lot of sense. Upon further looking at the documentation in the values file, I'm noticing some other issues I'm going to double check/fix:
This doesn't appear to be correct, according to the documentation:
-pipelinesRef: {}
-# secretRef:
-# secretName: ''
It should be:
# pipelinesRef:
# secretName: ''
Also, do we have the same situation for config
and configRef
? I believe we do. I'm going to double check that as well, as those seem to be mutually exclusive also.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Well seen, yes pipelinesRef. secretRef
is not valid
and config
/ configRef
are also mutually exclusive.
msg := "Specify at most one of [`config`, `configRef`], not both" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok @thbkrkr , the values file has been updated, the template will now fail on this as well, and there are 2x tests to ensure this functionality. Ready for next set of 👀 when you can. Thanks!
Add notes to values file to be more clear about mutually exclusive options. Add tests for mutual exclusion fails. Signed-off-by: Michael Montgomery <mmontg1@gmail.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good improvements! ✨
Fixes #8000
This change fixes a bug in the helm templating of Logstash and does not add
.spec.pipelines
when.spec.pipelinesRef
is also defined. In addition this adds a test to ensure that the fieldpipelines
is missing inspec
whenpipelinesRef
is also defined.