-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use dataset size instead of on-disk size for data stream stats #103342
Merged
elasticsearchmachine
merged 2 commits into
elastic:main
from
dakrone:use-dataset-for-datastream-stats
Dec 12, 2023
Merged
Use dataset size instead of on-disk size for data stream stats #103342
elasticsearchmachine
merged 2 commits into
elastic:main
from
dakrone:use-dataset-for-datastream-stats
Dec 12, 2023
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Previously we were using the size of the shard that was on local disk, however, in some cases (for object storage) this would return 0b, which is very confusing. This commit changes it to use the dataset size, which should be calculated regardless of where the data resides.
dakrone
added
>bug
:Data Management/Data streams
Data streams and their lifecycles
v8.12.1
v8.13.0
labels
Dec 12, 2023
Hi @dakrone, I've created a changelog YAML for you. |
elasticsearchmachine
added
the
Team:Data Management
Meta label for data/management team
label
Dec 12, 2023
Pinging @elastic/es-data-management (Team:Data Management) |
andreidan
approved these changes
Dec 12, 2023
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, thanks for fixing this Lee
dakrone
added
auto-merge-without-approval
Automatically merge pull request when CI checks pass (NB doesn't wait for reviews!)
auto-backport-and-merge
labels
Dec 12, 2023
dakrone
added a commit
to dakrone/elasticsearch
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 12, 2023
…ic#103342) Previously we were using the size of the shard that was on local disk, however, in some cases (for object storage) this would return 0b, which is very confusing. This commit changes it to use the dataset size, which should be calculated correctly regardless of where the data resides.
💚 Backport successful
|
elasticsearchmachine
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 12, 2023
…) (#103345) Previously we were using the size of the shard that was on local disk, however, in some cases (for object storage) this would return 0b, which is very confusing. This commit changes it to use the dataset size, which should be calculated correctly regardless of where the data resides.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
auto-merge-without-approval
Automatically merge pull request when CI checks pass (NB doesn't wait for reviews!)
>bug
:Data Management/Data streams
Data streams and their lifecycles
Team:Data Management
Meta label for data/management team
v8.12.1
v8.13.0
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Previously we were using the size of the shard that was on local disk, however, in some cases (for object storage) this would return 0b, which is very confusing. This commit changes it to use the dataset size, which should be calculated correctly regardless of where the data resides.