Tighten mapping syncing in ccr remote restore #38459
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
There are two issues regarding the way that we sync mapping from leader to follower when a ccr restore is completed: 1. The returned mapping from a cluster service might not be up to date as the mapping of the restored index commit. 2. We should not compare the mapping version of the follower and the leader. They are not related to one another. Moreover, I think we should only ensure that once the restore is done, the mapping on the follower should be at least the mapping of the copied index commit. We don't have to sync the mapping which is updated after we have opened a session. Relates elastic#36879 Closes elastic#37887
Tim-Brooks
added
>non-issue
:Distributed Indexing/CCR
|
Pinging @elastic/es-distributed |
Tim-Brooks
changed the title
dnhatn
approved these changes
Feb 5, 2019
|
@elasticmachine run elasticsearch-ci/1 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There are two issues regarding the way that we sync mapping from leader
to follower when a ccr restore is completed:
The returned mapping from a cluster service might not be up to date
as the mapping of the restored index commit.
We should not compare the mapping version of the follower and the
leader. They are not related to one another.
Moreover, I think we should only ensure that once the restore is done,
the mapping on the follower should be at least the mapping of the copied
index commit. We don't have to sync the mapping which is updated after
we have opened a session.
Relates #36879
Closes #37887