-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[ES UI] Audit plugins using <SectionError/> component #84801
Labels
chore
Team:Kibana Management
Dev Tools, Index Management, Upgrade Assistant, ILM, Ingest Node Pipelines, and more
Comments
alisonelizabeth
added
the
Team:Kibana Management
Dev Tools, Index Management, Upgrade Assistant, ILM, Ingest Node Pipelines, and more
label
Dec 2, 2020
Pinging @elastic/es-ui (Team:Elasticsearch UI) |
If we migrate to the new JS client first (#73973), then we'll just need to verify that full ES errors are surfaced in |
17 tasks
26 tasks
29 tasks
alisonelizabeth
removed
the
Team:Kibana Management
Dev Tools, Index Management, Upgrade Assistant, ILM, Ingest Node Pipelines, and more
label
Sep 17, 2024
alisonelizabeth
added
the
Team:Kibana Management
Dev Tools, Index Management, Upgrade Assistant, ILM, Ingest Node Pipelines, and more
label
Sep 17, 2024
Pinging @elastic/kibana-management (Team:Kibana Management) |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
chore
Team:Kibana Management
Dev Tools, Index Management, Upgrade Assistant, ILM, Ingest Node Pipelines, and more
A majority of our apps no longer display the full ES error in the UI when a request fails, which can cause confusion to a user when they are trying to troubleshoot the failure.
As part of #84184, a
es_error_parser.ts
reusable handler was created in thees_ui_shared/server
folder.We need to audit our existing apps that are using the
<SectionError/>
component and update the server code to use this utility. Example usage:Note that there is already a handleEsError handler for the new ES js client that we should incorporate this logic in. We should also consider if it makes sense to create a similar handler for the legacy client.
Related issues: #77165, #63270
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: