Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Authorized route migration for routes owned by security-solution #198382

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 19, 2024
Merged

Authorized route migration for routes owned by security-solution #198382

merged 2 commits into from
Nov 19, 2024
+28 −14

Conversation

kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor

@kibanamachine kibanamachine commented Oct 30, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Authz API migration for authorized routes

This PR migrates access:<privilege> tags used in route definitions to new security configuration.
Please refer to the documentation for more information: Authorization API

Before migration:

Access control tags were defined in the options object of the route:

router.get({
  path: '/api/path',
  options: {
    tags: ['access:<privilege_1>', 'access:<privilege_2>'],
  },
  ...
}, handler);

After migration:

Tags have been replaced with the more robust security.authz.requiredPrivileges field under security:

router.get({
  path: '/api/path',
  security: {
    authz: {
      requiredPrivileges: ['<privilege_1>', '<privilege_2>'],
    },
  },
  ...
}, handler);

What to do next?

  1. Review the changes in this PR.
  2. You might need to update your tests to reflect the new security configuration:
  • If you have tests that rely on checking access tags.
  • If you have snapshot tests that include the route definition.
  • If you have FTR tests that rely on checking unauthorized error message. The error message changed to also include missing privileges.

Any questions?

If you have any questions or need help with API authorization, please reach out to the @elastic/kibana-security team.

@kibanamachine kibanamachine requested a review from a team as a code owner October 30, 2024 15:07
@kibanamachine kibanamachine added enhancement New value added to drive a business result release_note:skip Skip the PR/issue when compiling release notes Feature:Security/Authorization Platform Security - Authorization Team: SecuritySolution Security Solutions Team working on SIEM, Endpoint, Timeline, Resolver, etc. backport:prev-minor Backport to (8.x) the previous minor version (i.e. one version back from main) Authz: API migration labels Oct 30, 2024
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

Pinging @elastic/security-solution (Team: SecuritySolution)

@elena-shostak elena-shostak mentioned this pull request Oct 30, 2024
Closed
@elena-shostak
Copy link
Contributor

@elasticmachine merge upstream

@elena-shostak elena-shostak enabled auto-merge (squash) November 19, 2024 15:36
@elena-shostak elena-shostak merged commit 3e9d77a into main Nov 19, 2024
43 checks passed
@elena-shostak elena-shostak deleted the authz-migration/authorized-routes-security-solution branch November 19, 2024 17:19
@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor Author

Starting backport for target branches: 8.x

https://github.com/elastic/kibana/actions/runs/11918307332

@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

💚 Build Succeeded

Metrics [docs]

✅ unchanged

History

kibanamachine added a commit to kibanamachine/kibana that referenced this pull request Nov 19, 2024
@kibanamachine
Authorized route migration for routes owned by security-solution (ela…
28788aa 
…stic#198382)

### Authz API migration for authorized routes

This PR migrates `access:<privilege>` tags used in route definitions to
new security configuration.
Please refer to the documentation for more information: [Authorization
API](https://docs.elastic.dev/kibana-dev-docs/key-concepts/security-api-authorization)

### **Before migration:**
Access control tags were defined in the `options` object of the route:

```ts
router.get({
  path: '/api/path',
  options: {
    tags: ['access:<privilege_1>', 'access:<privilege_2>'],
  },
  ...
}, handler);
```

### **After migration:**
Tags have been replaced with the more robust
`security.authz.requiredPrivileges` field under `security`:

```ts
router.get({
  path: '/api/path',
  security: {
    authz: {
      requiredPrivileges: ['<privilege_1>', '<privilege_2>'],
    },
  },
  ...
}, handler);
```

### What to do next?
1. Review the changes in this PR.
2. You might need to update your tests to reflect the new security
configuration:
  - If you have tests that rely on checking `access` tags.
  - If you have snapshot tests that include the route definition.
- If you have FTR tests that rely on checking unauthorized error
message. The error message changed to also include missing privileges.

## Any questions?
If you have any questions or need help with API authorization, please
reach out to the `@elastic/kibana-security` team.

Co-authored-by: Elastic Machine <elasticmachine@users.noreply.github.com>
(cherry picked from commit 3e9d77a)
@kibanamachine kibanamachine mentioned this pull request Nov 19, 2024
Merged
@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor Author

💚 All backports created successfully

Status Branch Result
✅ 8.x

Note: Successful backport PRs will be merged automatically after passing CI.

Questions ?

Please refer to the Backport tool documentation

kibanamachine added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 19, 2024
@kibanamachine
[8.x] Authorized route migration for routes owned by security-solution (
7575f42 
#198382) (#200782)

# Backport

This will backport the following commits from `main` to `8.x`:
- [Authorized route migration for routes owned by security-solution
(#198382)](#198382)

<!--- Backport version: 9.4.3 -->

### Questions ?
Please refer to the [Backport tool
documentation](https://github.com/sqren/backport)

<!--BACKPORT [{"author":{"name":"Kibana
Machine","email":"42973632+kibanamachine@users.noreply.github.com"},"sourceCommit":{"committedDate":"2024-11-19T17:19:44Z","message":"Authorized
route migration for routes owned by security-solution (#198382)\n\n###
Authz API migration for authorized routes\r\n\r\nThis PR migrates
`access:<privilege>` tags used in route definitions to\r\nnew security
configuration.\r\nPlease refer to the documentation for more
information:
[Authorization\r\nAPI](https://docs.elastic.dev/kibana-dev-docs/key-concepts/security-api-authorization)\r\n\r\n###
**Before migration:**\r\nAccess control tags were defined in the
`options` object of the route:\r\n\r\n```ts\r\nrouter.get({\r\n path:
'/api/path',\r\n options: {\r\n tags: ['access:<privilege_1>',
'access:<privilege_2>'],\r\n },\r\n ...\r\n},
handler);\r\n```\r\n\r\n### **After migration:**\r\nTags have been
replaced with the more robust\r\n`security.authz.requiredPrivileges`
field under `security`:\r\n\r\n```ts\r\nrouter.get({\r\n path:
'/api/path',\r\n security: {\r\n authz: {\r\n requiredPrivileges:
['<privilege_1>', '<privilege_2>'],\r\n },\r\n },\r\n ...\r\n},
handler);\r\n```\r\n\r\n### What to do next?\r\n1. Review the changes in
this PR.\r\n2. You might need to update your tests to reflect the new
security\r\nconfiguration:\r\n - If you have tests that rely on checking
`access` tags.\r\n - If you have snapshot tests that include the route
definition.\r\n- If you have FTR tests that rely on checking
unauthorized error\r\nmessage. The error message changed to also include
missing privileges.\r\n\r\n## Any questions?\r\nIf you have any
questions or need help with API authorization, please\r\nreach out to
the `@elastic/kibana-security` team.\r\n\r\nCo-authored-by: Elastic
Machine
<elasticmachine@users.noreply.github.com>","sha":"3e9d77a091b56016d13c1eee30e697dd3066029c","branchLabelMapping":{"^v9.0.0$":"main","^v8.17.0$":"8.x","^v(\\d+).(\\d+).\\d+$":"$1.$2"}},"sourcePullRequest":{"labels":["enhancement","release_note:skip","Feature:Security/Authorization","v9.0.0","Team:
SecuritySolution","backport:prev-minor","Authz: API
migration"],"title":"Authorized route migration for routes owned by
security-solution","number":198382,"url":"https://github.com/elastic/kibana/pull/198382","mergeCommit":{"message":"Authorized
route migration for routes owned by security-solution (#198382)\n\n###
Authz API migration for authorized routes\r\n\r\nThis PR migrates
`access:<privilege>` tags used in route definitions to\r\nnew security
configuration.\r\nPlease refer to the documentation for more
information:
[Authorization\r\nAPI](https://docs.elastic.dev/kibana-dev-docs/key-concepts/security-api-authorization)\r\n\r\n###
**Before migration:**\r\nAccess control tags were defined in the
`options` object of the route:\r\n\r\n```ts\r\nrouter.get({\r\n path:
'/api/path',\r\n options: {\r\n tags: ['access:<privilege_1>',
'access:<privilege_2>'],\r\n },\r\n ...\r\n},
handler);\r\n```\r\n\r\n### **After migration:**\r\nTags have been
replaced with the more robust\r\n`security.authz.requiredPrivileges`
field under `security`:\r\n\r\n```ts\r\nrouter.get({\r\n path:
'/api/path',\r\n security: {\r\n authz: {\r\n requiredPrivileges:
['<privilege_1>', '<privilege_2>'],\r\n },\r\n },\r\n ...\r\n},
handler);\r\n```\r\n\r\n### What to do next?\r\n1. Review the changes in
this PR.\r\n2. You might need to update your tests to reflect the new
security\r\nconfiguration:\r\n - If you have tests that rely on checking
`access` tags.\r\n - If you have snapshot tests that include the route
definition.\r\n- If you have FTR tests that rely on checking
unauthorized error\r\nmessage. The error message changed to also include
missing privileges.\r\n\r\n## Any questions?\r\nIf you have any
questions or need help with API authorization, please\r\nreach out to
the `@elastic/kibana-security` team.\r\n\r\nCo-authored-by: Elastic
Machine
<elasticmachine@users.noreply.github.com>","sha":"3e9d77a091b56016d13c1eee30e697dd3066029c"}},"sourceBranch":"main","suggestedTargetBranches":[],"targetPullRequestStates":[{"branch":"main","label":"v9.0.0","branchLabelMappingKey":"^v9.0.0$","isSourceBranch":true,"state":"MERGED","url":"https://github.com/elastic/kibana/pull/198382","number":198382,"mergeCommit":{"message":"Authorized
route migration for routes owned by security-solution (#198382)\n\n###
Authz API migration for authorized routes\r\n\r\nThis PR migrates
`access:<privilege>` tags used in route definitions to\r\nnew security
configuration.\r\nPlease refer to the documentation for more
information:
[Authorization\r\nAPI](https://docs.elastic.dev/kibana-dev-docs/key-concepts/security-api-authorization)\r\n\r\n###
**Before migration:**\r\nAccess control tags were defined in the
`options` object of the route:\r\n\r\n```ts\r\nrouter.get({\r\n path:
'/api/path',\r\n options: {\r\n tags: ['access:<privilege_1>',
'access:<privilege_2>'],\r\n },\r\n ...\r\n},
handler);\r\n```\r\n\r\n### **After migration:**\r\nTags have been
replaced with the more robust\r\n`security.authz.requiredPrivileges`
field under `security`:\r\n\r\n```ts\r\nrouter.get({\r\n path:
'/api/path',\r\n security: {\r\n authz: {\r\n requiredPrivileges:
['<privilege_1>', '<privilege_2>'],\r\n },\r\n },\r\n ...\r\n},
handler);\r\n```\r\n\r\n### What to do next?\r\n1. Review the changes in
this PR.\r\n2. You might need to update your tests to reflect the new
security\r\nconfiguration:\r\n - If you have tests that rely on checking
`access` tags.\r\n - If you have snapshot tests that include the route
definition.\r\n- If you have FTR tests that rely on checking
unauthorized error\r\nmessage. The error message changed to also include
missing privileges.\r\n\r\n## Any questions?\r\nIf you have any
questions or need help with API authorization, please\r\nreach out to
the `@elastic/kibana-security` team.\r\n\r\nCo-authored-by: Elastic
Machine
<elasticmachine@users.noreply.github.com>","sha":"3e9d77a091b56016d13c1eee30e697dd3066029c"}}]}]
BACKPORT-->
paulinashakirova pushed a commit to paulinashakirova/kibana that referenced this pull request Nov 26, 2024
@kibanamachine @elasticmachine @paulinashakirova
Authorized route migration for routes owned by security-solution (ela…
d12b7e9 
…stic#198382)

### Authz API migration for authorized routes

This PR migrates `access:<privilege>` tags used in route definitions to
new security configuration.
Please refer to the documentation for more information: [Authorization
API](https://docs.elastic.dev/kibana-dev-docs/key-concepts/security-api-authorization)

### **Before migration:**
Access control tags were defined in the `options` object of the route:

```ts
router.get({
  path: '/api/path',
  options: {
    tags: ['access:<privilege_1>', 'access:<privilege_2>'],
  },
  ...
}, handler);
```

### **After migration:**
Tags have been replaced with the more robust
`security.authz.requiredPrivileges` field under `security`:

```ts
router.get({
  path: '/api/path',
  security: {
    authz: {
      requiredPrivileges: ['<privilege_1>', '<privilege_2>'],
    },
  },
  ...
}, handler);
```

### What to do next?
1. Review the changes in this PR.
2. You might need to update your tests to reflect the new security
configuration:
  - If you have tests that rely on checking `access` tags.
  - If you have snapshot tests that include the route definition.
- If you have FTR tests that rely on checking unauthorized error
message. The error message changed to also include missing privileges.

## Any questions?
If you have any questions or need help with API authorization, please
reach out to the `@elastic/kibana-security` team.

Co-authored-by: Elastic Machine <elasticmachine@users.noreply.github.com>
CAWilson94 pushed a commit to CAWilson94/kibana that referenced this pull request Dec 12, 2024
@kibanamachine @elasticmachine @CAWilson94
Authorized route migration for routes owned by security-solution (ela…
54b7d06 
…stic#198382)

### Authz API migration for authorized routes

This PR migrates `access:<privilege>` tags used in route definitions to
new security configuration.
Please refer to the documentation for more information: [Authorization
API](https://docs.elastic.dev/kibana-dev-docs/key-concepts/security-api-authorization)

### **Before migration:**
Access control tags were defined in the `options` object of the route:

```ts
router.get({
  path: '/api/path',
  options: {
    tags: ['access:<privilege_1>', 'access:<privilege_2>'],
  },
  ...
}, handler);
```

### **After migration:**
Tags have been replaced with the more robust
`security.authz.requiredPrivileges` field under `security`:

```ts
router.get({
  path: '/api/path',
  security: {
    authz: {
      requiredPrivileges: ['<privilege_1>', '<privilege_2>'],
    },
  },
  ...
}, handler);
```

### What to do next?
1. Review the changes in this PR.
2. You might need to update your tests to reflect the new security
configuration:
  - If you have tests that rely on checking `access` tags.
  - If you have snapshot tests that include the route definition.
- If you have FTR tests that rely on checking unauthorized error
message. The error message changed to also include missing privileges.

## Any questions?
If you have any questions or need help with API authorization, please
reach out to the `@elastic/kibana-security` team.

Co-authored-by: Elastic Machine <elasticmachine@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@PhilippeOberti PhilippeOberti PhilippeOberti approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Authz: API migration backport:prev-minor Backport to (8.x) the previous minor version (i.e. one version back from main) enhancement New value added to drive a business result Feature:Security/Authorization Platform Security - Authorization release_note:skip Skip the PR/issue when compiling release notes Team: SecuritySolution Security Solutions Team working on SIEM, Endpoint, Timeline, Resolver, etc. v8.17.0 v9.0.0
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@kibanamachine @elasticmachine @elena-shostak @PhilippeOberti