[core/public/deepFreeze] fix recursive type for better array support #22904
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
spalger
changed the title
💚 Build Succeeded |
spalger
pushed a commit
to spalger/kibana
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 11, 2018
…lastic#22904) The `deepFreeze()` function used by `core.injectedMetadata` uses a recursive type definition to indicate that all of the child types within the passed argument become readonly, which works fine for objects but represents arrays as objects instead of using the `ReadonlyArray<>` type. This PR fixes the type definition to use a `RecursiveReadonlyArray<>` type that properly represents arrays with their methods like `push()`, and iterates into the array properly to propagate `ReadOnly<>`, as proven by the tests.
|
6.x/6.5: cfd2a8f |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The
deepFreeze()function used bycore.injectedMetadatauses a recursive type definition to indicate that all of the child types within the passed argument become readonly, which works fine for objects but represents arrays as objects instead of using theReadonlyArray<>type.This PR fixes the type definition to use a
RecursiveReadonlyArray<>type that properly represents arrays with their methods likepush(), and iterates into the array properly to propagateReadOnly<>, as proven by the tests.