-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 289
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refactor: add metadata basemodel #260
refactor: add metadata basemodel #260
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A few recommendations otherwise I believe it looks good.
Can you also bump the version number. An example where you transform DDisco would also be great (then the other reviewers can see how it would look in practice).
Ah, good point. Should we perhaps set up semantic versioning?
Should already be in the commit history? df7672d#diff-35934ee4d3e5d7d6659d8cc6c67991c680adf28f1d1d78ab9701f6978e0dd90b Good catches on the missing |
Ah thanks must have missed it. |
Questions before merge:
|
I believe so @Muennighoff will have to confirm though. |
…er structure. (embeddings-benchmark#254) * Added model results to repo and updated CLI to create consistent folder structure. * ci: updated ci to use make install * Added missing pytest dependencies * Update README.md Co-authored-by: Niklas Muennighoff <n.muennighoff@gmail.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Niklas Muennighoff <n.muennighoff@gmail.com>
* restructing the readme * removed double specification of versions and moved all setup to pyproject.toml * correctly use flat-layout for the package
Should be ready to merge @KennethEnevoldsen 👍 |
The tests seem to fail @MartinBernstorff it seems to be due to a missing pydantic dependency. |
@KennethEnevoldsen Seems I haven't been added as a collaborator, so I can't merge this. Ready to merge now 👍 |
For initial feedback. Note that the first commit is a large refactor, so recommend excluding it from the diff when reviewing, e.g. only looking at:
df7672d
If we are agreed on the schema, we can merge, and then I'll then start updating the 100+ existing tasks. What do you think @KennethEnevoldsen?
Todo: