Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[CLEANUP beta] Remove deprecated registry behaviour #11756

Closed

Conversation

cibernox
Copy link
Contributor

  • Registry no longer instantiates a container and forwards lookup/lookupFactory to it.
  • Removed checks for ember-application-instance-initializers and ember-application-initializer-context
    since they have been enabled by default for ~4 months now.

@cibernox cibernox force-pushed the remove_deprecated_registry_behavior branch from 771cb5a to 5c007d6 Compare July 15, 2015 13:48
* Registry no longer instantiates a container and forwards
  lookup/lookupFactory to it.
* Removed checks for `ember-application-instance-initializers` and `ember-application-initializer-context`
  since they have been enabled by default for ~4 months now.
@cibernox cibernox force-pushed the remove_deprecated_registry_behavior branch from 5c007d6 to 5ab3b54 Compare July 15, 2015 14:12
@stefanpenner
Copy link
Member

Cc @dgeb

@dgeb
Copy link
Member

dgeb commented Jul 15, 2015

I'm going to be rebasing #11440 today and look into tweaking lookupFactory with @wycats.

That will cover the same ground as this PR.

@stefanpenner
Copy link
Member

That will cover the same ground as this PR.

does this mean this PR is not needed?

@cibernox
Copy link
Contributor Author

@dgeb Do you want to rebase that branch over this or just close this one and do all the work in #11440?

@dgeb
Copy link
Member

dgeb commented Jul 15, 2015

I will rebase #11440 to target master and then we'll need to remove all the deprecations by either rebasing this PR or creating a new one. I'm just hesitant to merge this first given the extent of changes in #11440.

@dgeb dgeb mentioned this pull request Jul 21, 2015
3 tasks
@dgeb
Copy link
Member

dgeb commented Jul 21, 2015

So @rwjblue and I have devised a plan related to this PR and #11440 - see #11440 (comment)

#11440 won't land until after 2.0, so we can proceed with merging these changes prior to 2.0. I'll rebase this PR (since I caused the delay) and, if needed, add any significant changes in a separate commit.

@rwjblue
Copy link
Member

rwjblue commented Jul 21, 2015

Closing in favor of #11853.

@rwjblue rwjblue closed this Jul 21, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants