Introduce deprecation and warning hook API

text/0065-deprecation-warning-handlers.md

@@ -0,0 +1,176 @@
+- Start Date: 2015-06-30
+- RFC PR: https://github.com/emberjs/rfcs/pull/65
+- Ember Issue: (leave this empty)
+
+# Summary
+
+Deprecations and warnings in Ember.js should have configurable runtime handlers.
+This allows default behavior (logging, raise when `RAISE_ON_DEPRECATION` is true)
+to be overridden by an enviornment (Ember's tests), addon, or other tool
+(like the Ember Inspector).
+
+Ember-Data and the Ember Inspector have both requested a public
+API for changing how deprecation and warning messages are handled. The requirements
+for these and other requests are complex enough that deferring the message
+behavior into a runtime hook is the suggested path.
+
+# Motivation
+
+`Ember.deprecate` and `Ember.warn` usually log messages. With `ENV.RAISE_ON_DEPRECATION`
+all deprecations will throw an exception. In some scenarios, this
+is less than ideal:
+
+* Ember itself needs a way to silence some deprecations before their usage
+  is completely removed from tests. For example, many view APIs in Ember 1.13.
+* The Ember inspector desires to raise on specific deprecations, or silence
+  specific deprecations.
+* Ember-Data also desires to silence some deprecations in tests
+
+In [PR #1141](https://github.com/emberjs/ember.js/pull/11419)
+a private log level API has been introduced, which allows finer grained control
+if specific deprecations should be logged, throwing an error or be silenced
+completely. For example:
+
+```js
+Ember.Debug._addDeprecationLevel('my-feature', Ember.Debug._deprecationLevels.LOG);
+// ...
+Ember.deprecate("x is deprecated, use Y instead", false, { id: 'my-feature' });
+```
+
+Initially a public version of this API was discussed, but it quickly became
+clear that a runtime hook provided more flexibility without incurring the
+cost of a complex log-level API.
+
+Note that "runtime" refers to Ember itself. A custom handler could be injected
+into Ember-CLI's template compilation code. "runtime" in this context still
+refers to handling deprecations raised during compilation.
+
+# Detailed design
+
+A handler for deprecations can be registered. This handler will be called
+with relevent information about a deprecation, including guarantees about
+the presence of these items:
+
+* The deprecation message
+* The version number where this deprecation (and feature) will be removed
+* The "id" of this deprecation, a stable identifier independent of the message
+
+Additionally, an application instance may be passed with the options. An example
+handler would look like:
+
+```js
+import { registerHandler } from "ember-debug/deprecations";
+
+registerHandler(function deprecationHandler(message, options) {
+  // * message is the deprecation message
+  // * options.until is the version this deprecation will be removed at
+  // * options.id is the canonical id for this deprecation
+  if (options.until === "2.4.0") {
+    throw new Error(message);
+  } else {
+    console.log(message);
+  }
+});
+```
+
+Warnings are similar, but will not recieve an `until` value:
+
+```js
+import { registerHandler } from "ember-debug/warnings";
+
+registerHandler(function warningHandler(message, options) {
+  // * message is the warning message
+  // * options.id is the canonical id for this warning
+  if (options.id !== 'view.rerender-on-set') {
+    console.log(message);
+  }
+});
+```
+
+##### chained handlers
+
+Since several handlers may be registered, a method of deferring to a previously
+registered handler must be allowed. A third option is passed to handlers, the
+function `next` which represents the previously registered handler.
+
+For example:
+
+```js
+import { registerHandler } from "ember-debug/deprecations";
+
+registerHandler(function firstDeprecationHandler(message, options, next) {
+  console.warn(message);
+});
+
+registerHandler(function secondDeprecationHandler(message, options, next) {
+  if (options.until === "2.4.0") {
+    throw new Error(message);
+  }
+  next(...arguments);
+});
+```
+
+The first registed handler will receive Ember's default behavior as `next`.
+
+##### new assertions for deprecate and warn
+
+Ember's APIs for deprecation and warning do not currently require any information
+beyond a message. It is proposed that deprecations be **required** to pass
+the following information:
+
+* Message
+* Test
+* Canonical id (with a format of `package-name.some-id`)
+* Release when this deprecation will be stripped
+
+For example:
+
+```
+import Ember from "ember";
+
+Ember.deprecate("Some message", false, {
+  id: 'ember-routing.query-params',
+  until: '3.0.0'
+});
+```
+
+If this information is not present and assertion will be made.
+
+Warnings likewise will be required to pass a canonical id:
+
+```
+import Ember from "ember";
+
+Ember.warn("Some warning", {id: 'ember-debug.something'});
+```
+
+##### default handlers
+
+The default handler for deprecation should be quite simple, and mirrors current
+behavior:
+
+```js
+function defaultDeprecationHandler(message, options) {
+  if (Ember.ENV.RAISE_ON_DEPRECATION) {
+   throw new Error(format(message, options));
+  } else {
+   console.log(format(message, options));
+  }
+}
+```
+
+The default handler for warnings would be simple `console.log`.
+
+# Drawbacks
+
+By not providing a robust log-level API, we are punting complexity to the
+consumer of this API. For a low-level tooling API such as this one, it seems
+and appropriate tradeoff.
+
+# Alternatives
+
+Each app can stub out `deprecate` and `warn`.
+
+# Unresolved questions
+
+`RAISE_ON_DEPRECATION` could be considered deprecated with this new API.