refactor(msg): payload type table migration and update #1562
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ysfscream
added
enhancement
Red-Asuka
approved these changes
Jan 17, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
PR Checklist
If you have any questions, you can refer to the Contributing Guide
What is the current behavior?
Please describe the current behavior and link to a relevant issue.
Add a new cbor type, the error in the console.
Issue Number
Example: #1547
What is the new behavior?
Manually update the migration script to change the payload type to a more flexible and extensible string type to facilitate future expansion. It is very troublesome to update using a simple enum due to the limitation of typeorm.
Please describe the new behavior or provide screenshots.
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Specific Instructions
Are there any specific instructions or things that should be known prior to review?
Other information