docs(pass-style): don't rely on Remotable in Far docs #2191
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
erights
approved these changes
Mar 29, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
refs:
Description / Documentation Considerations
The 1st bit of SDK used in the 1st sample app in our docs is
Far.https://github.com/Agoric/dapp-offer-up/blob/cbf3836dff05e95220a201f930430a10ce960ce3/contract/src/offer-up.contract.js#L22
likewise the "hello world" contract in smart contract basics.
Far's JSDoc was in terms of Remotable. I don't think folks using
Farneed to know aboutRemotableso much.There's momentum to skip
Farand teach exo's from the start (Agoric/documentation#1033) but we're not there yet.Security / Scaling / Testing / Compatibility / Upgrade Considerations
n/a