-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 66
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Better ppc64le support and minor improvements #184
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Marvin Giessing <marvin.giessing@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marvin Giessing <marvin.giessing@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marvin Giessing <marvin.giessing@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marvin Giessing <marvin.giessing@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marvin Giessing <marvin.giessing@gmail.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice work!
;; | ||
'x86_64' ) | ||
LLVM_DISTRO=x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-18.04 | ||
LLVM_SHA256SUM=61582215dafafb7b576ea30cc136be92c877ba1f1c31ddbbd372d6d65622fef5 | ||
apt-get install -y --no-install-recommends \ | ||
google-cloud-sdk \ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
why do we need google-cloud-sdk here? you can add this only if x86_64 and aarch64 to PACKAGES in above.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure whether there is a more elegant solution but I'll append the google-cloud-sdk if ARCH is x86 or arm ok?
Will look like this:
PACKAGES=(
[...]
)
if [[ "${ARCH}" == "x86_64" || "${ARCH}" == "aarch64" ]]; then
PACKAGES+=("google-cloud-sdk")
fi
I'll also add libtinfo5 in PACKAGES, then we can remove the complete apt-get install ...
in the LLVM part.
Would that be fine with you?
@@ -86,24 +75,31 @@ case $ARCH in | |||
'ppc64le' ) | |||
LLVM_DISTRO=powerpc64le-linux-ubuntu-18.04 | |||
LLVM_SHA256SUM=2d504c4920885c86b306358846178bc2232dfac83b47c3b1d05861a8162980e6 | |||
apt-get install -y --no-install-recommends \ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this can be outside of the case
statement once google-cloud-sdk handling is moved up.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As described above I think we can remove all apt-get ...
in all the LLVM part because that is then handled via PACKAGES already.
Would look like this
# Set LLVM version for each cpu architecture.
LLVM_VERSION=14.0.0
case $ARCH in
'ppc64le' )
LLVM_DISTRO=powerpc64le-linux-ubuntu-18.04
LLVM_SHA256SUM=2d504c4920885c86b306358846178bc2232dfac83b47c3b1d05861a8162980e6
;;
'x86_64' )
LLVM_DISTRO=x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-18.04
LLVM_SHA256SUM=61582215dafafb7b576ea30cc136be92c877ba1f1c31ddbbd372d6d65622fef5
;;
'aarch64' )
LLVM_DISTRO=aarch64-linux-gnu
LLVM_SHA256SUM=1792badcd44066c79148ffeb1746058422cc9d838462be07e3cb19a4b724a1ee
;;
esac
Would that be fine with you?
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ config_env() { | |||
|
|||
if [[ -z "${BUILD_TOOLS_PLATFORMS}" ]]; then | |||
if [[ "${OS_DISTRO}" == "ubuntu" ]]; then | |||
export BUILD_TOOLS_PLATFORMS=linux/arm64,linux/amd64 | |||
export BUILD_TOOLS_PLATFORMS=linux/arm64,linux/amd64,linux/ppc64le |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
let's hold off this for now as it drastically increases image build time in CI with emulation + building tools.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sure - I can remove this with the next commit I'm just wondering if you don't want to have it built at all or just while this PR is not finally approved.
Thanks!
Signed-off-by: Marvin Giessing <marvin.giessing@gmail.com>
@lizan I've updated the PR accordingly - can you have another check? :) |
I'm also interested in simplifying the ppc build - is there any update on this @lizan? |
This is PR helps in improving the ppc64le build container (and minor improvement for the other archs), however the bazelisk part is not yet supported, so the correct bazel version needs to be downloaded manually.