-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
headers: fixing fast fail of size-validation #4269
Merged
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
176472e
one more OOM vector
alyssawilk f668193
reviewer comments
alyssawilk f39ec4c
Hopefully unbreaking the mac build. will write test tomorrow
alyssawilk 8745ebd
one more test, fixing EXPECT_DEATH macro for asan/tsan
alyssawilk 580e760
disabling proof of concept test
alyssawilk d3ffa9d
trying to fix coverage build
alyssawilk eefc16f
Merge branch 'master' into RELEASE_ASSERT
alyssawilk File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -92,9 +92,12 @@ void HeaderString::append(const char* data, uint32_t size) { | |
// allocate and copy. | ||
type_ = Type::Dynamic; | ||
const uint64_t new_capacity = newCapacity(string_length_, size); | ||
dynamic_capacity_ = std::max(MinDynamicCapacity, new_capacity); | ||
if (dynamic_capacity_ != MinDynamicCapacity) { | ||
if (new_capacity > MinDynamicCapacity) { | ||
// TODO(alyssawilk) unit test. | ||
validateCapacity(new_capacity); | ||
dynamic_capacity_ = new_capacity; | ||
} else { | ||
dynamic_capacity_ = MinDynamicCapacity; | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Yep, much cleaner now, thanks. |
||
} | ||
char* buf = static_cast<char*>(malloc(dynamic_capacity_)); | ||
RELEASE_ASSERT(buf != nullptr, ""); | ||
|
@@ -104,7 +107,8 @@ void HeaderString::append(const char* data, uint32_t size) { | |
} | ||
|
||
case Type::Inline: { | ||
if (size + 1 + string_length_ <= sizeof(inline_buffer_)) { | ||
const uint64_t new_capacity = static_cast<uint64_t>(size) + 1 + string_length_; | ||
if (new_capacity <= sizeof(inline_buffer_)) { | ||
// Already inline and the new value fits in inline storage. | ||
break; | ||
} | ||
|
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For some reason, my comment was lost here. I was wondering if we could move
validateCapacity
up and make it unconditional?