-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 52
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Allow version-type: strict + otp-version: master for Elixir -based bu…
…ilds (#144) * Check tests failing for something that should pass * Test with version-type: strict * Add more tests GitHub actions is refusing to run a given workflow :shrug * Try to fix new test that shouldn't be failing Which is exactly what we intended to originate by starting a new pull request. * Fix tests as per CI * Fix tests as per CI * Adapt to "latest" * Fix as per CI results Actions' window shows everything as Ok but then internals not Error when evaluating 'runs-on' for job 'integration_test'. .github/workflows/ubuntu.yml (Line: 19, Col: 14): Unexpected type of value '', expected type: OneOf. Strange one, this one! * Try to "help" for non-OTP declared input We do this for OTP-, but not for maint- as the former is hopefully more common than the latter * Introduce `latest` to signify `master` Semantically they're similar, but with `latest` we know: 1. to fetch Elixir's no-otp-... version 2. to fetch Erlang's master whereas with 25 (latest at this moment) we'd try to fetch elixirvsn-otp-25 which could fail with Elixir master and version-type strict * Fix as per CI Still not 100% convinced that `latest` should be separate from `master` but I want to know how tests run, in this case in particular * Fix as per CI * Fix as per CI * Revert potential wrong decision * Fix as per understand recent Elixir changes (namely master v. main) * Try to simplify it We introduce the concept of version v. branch (as per @ericmj) and we use that to find the most appropriate Erlang/Elixir combo.
- Loading branch information
1 parent
4c52669
commit 8d31e4d
Showing
4 changed files
with
117 additions
and
127 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.