Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Minor revisions #4

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Oct 9, 2023
Merged

Conversation

zware
Copy link
Collaborator

@zware zware commented Oct 7, 2023

I finally had a chance to look through and had a few relatively minor suggestions.

I also want to go through our poll results again to refresh my memory. I feel like there's more in them that we could stand to add here.


📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://pep-previews--4.org.readthedocs.build/

@zware zware requested a review from erlend-aasland October 7, 2023 04:04
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
PEP: 755
Title: Status quo of the CPython 3.12 build system
Author: Erlend Egeberg Aasland <erlend@python.org>,
Zachary Ware <zachary.ware@gmail.com>
Zachary Ware <zach@python.org>
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

BTW, you'll need to fix your email in your previous PEPs first. I had to do the same (see python#3463)

For core developers, a common use cases are _reconfigure_ and _rebuild_;
this was reflected in the poll responses:
we want fast and correct incremental builds.
For core developers, a common use case is _reconfigure_ and _rebuild_:
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How about this?

Suggested change
For core developers, a common use case is _reconfigure_ and _rebuild_:
For core developers, common use cases are _reconfigure_ and _rebuild_:

peps/pep-0755.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
peps/pep-0755.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@erlend-aasland erlend-aasland merged commit ed52a72 into erlend-aasland:build-system/part1 Oct 9, 2023
2 of 4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants