Skip to content

DMA: Don't require implementors of Read/WriteBuffer to be Sealed #6010

DMA: Don't require implementors of Read/WriteBuffer to be Sealed

DMA: Don't require implementors of Read/WriteBuffer to be Sealed #6010

Triggered via pull request August 11, 2024 13:53
Status Cancelled
Total duration 15m 41s
Artifacts

ci.yml

on: pull_request
Matrix: esp-hal
Matrix: hil
Fit to window
Zoom out
Zoom in

Annotations

1 error
esp-hal (esp32s3)
Canceling since a higher priority waiting request for 'CI-1921' exists