Pylontech mostempr #4277
Pylontech mostempr #4277
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces updates to the documentation regarding Pylontech battery specifications. It corrects the console port connector type from "RJ10" to "RJ11" and expands the number of child batteries that can be monitored from a range of 2-6 to 2-16. Additionally, the RJ45 pinout table has been modified to align with the new connector type, and new references have been added to the "See Also" section for further resources. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Documentation
participant Pylontech
User->>Documentation: Requests battery connection specifications
Documentation->>Pylontech: Fetches updated specifications
Pylontech-->>Documentation: Provides updated connector type and monitoring range
Documentation-->>User: Displays updated specifications
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
✅ Deploy Preview for esphome ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
components/pylontech.rst (1)
Line range hint
53-65: LGTM: RJ11 pinout table addedThe addition of the RJ11 Console Pinout table for US2000B and US2000 models is valuable and enhances the documentation.
Consider adding a visual representation of the RJ11 pinout, similar to the RJ45 pinout image, to improve clarity for users.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- components/pylontech.rst (5 hunks)
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (1)
components/pylontech.rst (1)
Pattern
**: - Do not generate or add any sequence diagrams
Additional comments not posted (5)
components/pylontech.rst (5)
25-25: LGTM: Connector type correctedThe change from RJ10 to RJ11 is correct and aligns with the PR objectives.
108-108: LGTM: Battery support range updatedThe change to reflect support for up to 16 child batteries (2..16) is correct and aligns with the PR objectives.
139-139: LGTM: Text sensor battery support range updatedThe change to reflect support for up to 16 child batteries (2..16) in the text sensor configuration is correct and consistent with the earlier update.
196-197: LGTM: Additional resources addedThe addition of links to MultiSIBControl and ioBroker.pylontech in the "See Also" section provides valuable resources for users and enhances the documentation.
Line range hint
1-199: Overall: Documentation successfully updatedThis PR successfully achieves its objectives:
- The support for 16 batteries (up from 6) is now correctly documented.
- The "RJ10" to "RJ11" typographical error has been fixed.
Additional improvements:
- A new RJ11 pinout table has been added for US2000B and US2000 models.
- The "See Also" section has been expanded with relevant resources.
These changes enhance the overall quality and completeness of the Pylontech Battery component documentation.
|
Yay thank you :) |
Description:
Document 16 batteries instead of 6.
Also fix RJ10 typo and change it to RJ11.
The parent PR with the code changes has been merged long ago already.
The docs PR (#3520) was just forgotten. So i am resubmitting.
Related issue (if applicable):
Pull request in esphome with YAML changes (if applicable):
Checklist:
I am merging into
nextbecause this is new documentation that has a matching pull-request in esphome as linked above.or
I am merging into
currentbecause this is a fix, change and/or adjustment in the current documentation and is not for a new component or feature.Link added in
/index.rstwhen creating new documents for new components or cookbook.