Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Automated cherry pick of #13224 #14575

Conversation

pchan
Copy link
Contributor

@pchan pchan commented Oct 12, 2022

Cherry pick of #13224 on release-3.4.

#13224: netutil: add url comparison without resolver to

sakateka and others added 3 commits October 12, 2022 09:46
If one of the nodes in the cluster has lost a dns record,
restarting the second node will break it.
This PR makes an attempt to add a comparison without using a resolver,
which allows to protect cluster from dns errors and does not break
the current logic of comparing urls in the URLStringsEqual function.
You can read more in the issue etcd-io#7798

Fixes etcd-io#7798
Co-authored-by: Lili Cosic <cosiclili@gmail.com>
@pchan
Copy link
Contributor Author

pchan commented Oct 12, 2022

/cc @ahrtr

@ahrtr
Copy link
Member

ahrtr commented Oct 12, 2022

Please signoff the commits:

git rebase --signoff HEAD~3

sakateka and others added 4 commits October 12, 2022 14:50
If one of the nodes in the cluster has lost a dns record,
restarting the second node will break it.
This PR makes an attempt to add a comparison without using a resolver,
which allows to protect cluster from dns errors and does not break
the current logic of comparing urls in the URLStringsEqual function.
You can read more in the issue etcd-io#7798

Fixes etcd-io#7798

Signed-off-by: Prasad Chandrasekaran <prasadc@vmware.com>
Co-authored-by: Lili Cosic <cosiclili@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Prasad Chandrasekaran <prasadc@vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: Prasad Chandrasekaran <prasadc@vmware.com>
@pchan
Copy link
Contributor Author

pchan commented Oct 12, 2022

Closing this PR. Opened #14577 with proper sign-offs.

@pchan pchan closed this Oct 12, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants