Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Workarounds for broken complex type operator overloads in HIP 5.7 onwards #1083

Closed

Conversation

msimberg
Copy link
Collaborator

@msimberg msimberg commented Jan 17, 2024

Nothing to see here yet. This is an ugly, hacky attempt at not using the broken upstream operators, but I'm unsure if 1. it works correctly, 2. it generates the same/similar code, and 3. if it's maintainable. Opening as PR to see how it works in CI. I know it compiles with HIP 5.2.3, nothing more.

@msimberg
Copy link
Collaborator Author

cscs-ci run

1 similar comment
@msimberg
Copy link
Collaborator Author

cscs-ci run

@msimberg msimberg force-pushed the hip-5.7-operator-workarounds branch from 73dd157 to 396f32e Compare January 18, 2024 12:49
@msimberg
Copy link
Collaborator Author

cscs-ci run

@msimberg msimberg force-pushed the hip-5.7-operator-workarounds branch from 396f32e to a0011e0 Compare January 18, 2024 13:03
@msimberg
Copy link
Collaborator Author

cscs-ci run

@msimberg
Copy link
Collaborator Author

msimberg commented Feb 1, 2024

I've just discovered that it seems like spack patches the issue in HIP: https://github.com/spack/spack/blob/develop/var/spack/repos/builtin/packages/hip/0015-reverting-operator-mixup-fix-for-slate.patch. The upstream comment about use of the operators being discouraged still applies of course, and they haven't reverted the change that broke things upstream. That said I'm probably going to lower the priority of this a bit, and we can perhaps think longer term about a "whipblas" interface.

@msimberg
Copy link
Collaborator Author

msimberg commented Oct 3, 2024

I'll close this as #1195 proposes a simpler fix. We can always revisit the more complicated approach.

@msimberg msimberg closed this Oct 3, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant