Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add erc1271 support to contract account #1052
Add erc1271 support to contract account #1052
Changes from all commits
d8b2003
89c5a6f
13e01d3
a62689b
922638f
bb6d8ae
5d38b56
b011ac1
4abcba1
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@smartcontracts set up the
Lib_ExecutionManagerWrapper.ovmADDRESS
to execute in a separate delegated call frame so that it can besmock
ed, see "smocked.ovmADDRESS
" elsewhere in these tests. This is why we otherwise useovmADDRESS
in the contract account instead ofaddress(this)
. Alternatively in this case we could useawait smockit('OVM_ECDSAContractAccount', {address: wallet.address})
to make theaddress(this)
work in this case IIRC. Either way, I think the integration test we have is probably fine for nowThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
can't use
Lib_ExecutionManagerWrapper.ovmADDRESS
because we need to keepisValidSignature
as a view function. Going to try out that smockit approachThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
:/ smockit didn't work for this, going to just keep my integration test