Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

contracts-bedrock: loadAllocs support #8148

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Nov 27, 2023
Merged

contracts-bedrock: loadAllocs support #8148

merged 12 commits into from
Nov 27, 2023

Conversation

tynes
Copy link
Contributor

@tynes tynes commented Nov 13, 2023

Description

Small tweaks to the L2 contracts tests to make the
new method of setting up the L2 state work. This depends
on the latest build of ci-builder and updating the
foundry version in #8144.

@tynes
Copy link
Contributor Author

tynes commented Nov 13, 2023

We are expecting these tests to fail until we have the new ci-builder image running in CI

@tynes tynes force-pushed the ctb/l2-load-allocs branch 2 times, most recently from ab5a18b to 9ef6889 Compare November 15, 2023 13:47
@tynes tynes marked this pull request as ready for review November 15, 2023 13:47
@tynes tynes requested a review from a team as a code owner November 15, 2023 13:47
@tynes tynes requested a review from clabby November 15, 2023 13:47
@tynes
Copy link
Contributor Author

tynes commented Nov 19, 2023

This error doesn't seem to happen locally, need to figure out why it is failing in CI still

@tynes tynes force-pushed the ctb/l2-load-allocs branch 3 times, most recently from 1ab45ac to 266ba67 Compare November 21, 2023 10:19
@tynes tynes mentioned this pull request Nov 24, 2023
@tynes tynes force-pushed the ctb/l2-load-allocs branch 2 times, most recently from 825effa to 256d425 Compare November 27, 2023 16:42
@tynes tynes requested a review from a team as a code owner November 27, 2023 17:33
@tynes tynes requested a review from mslipper November 27, 2023 17:33
@tynes tynes added this pull request to the merge queue Nov 27, 2023
@tynes tynes removed this pull request from the merge queue due to a manual request Nov 27, 2023
@tynes tynes closed this Nov 27, 2023
@tynes tynes reopened this Nov 27, 2023
@tynes tynes enabled auto-merge November 27, 2023 20:09
Small tweaks to the L2 contracts tests to make the
new method of setting up the L2 state work. This depends
on the latest build of `ci-builder` and updating the
foundry version in #8144.
auto-merge was automatically disabled November 27, 2023 20:17

Pull Request is not mergeable

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 27, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #8148 (f58cb3a) into develop (2119f38) will increase coverage by 0.04%.
Report is 6 commits behind head on develop.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #8148      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    40.88%   40.93%   +0.04%     
===========================================
  Files          162      162              
  Lines         6048     6048              
  Branches       970      970              
===========================================
+ Hits          2473     2476       +3     
+ Misses        3501     3496       -5     
- Partials        74       76       +2     
Flag Coverage Δ
cannon-go-tests 63.48% <ø> (ø)
chain-mon-tests 26.95% <ø> (ø)
common-ts-tests 26.74% <ø> (ø)
contracts-bedrock-tests 21.95% <ø> (+0.15%) ⬆️
contracts-ts-tests 100.00% <ø> (ø)
core-utils-tests 44.03% <ø> (ø)
sdk-next-tests 42.18% <ø> (ø)
sdk-tests 42.18% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 3 files with indirect coverage changes

@mslipper mslipper added this pull request to the merge queue Nov 27, 2023
@tynes tynes removed this pull request from the merge queue due to a manual request Nov 27, 2023
@tynes tynes merged commit 03ad50f into develop Nov 27, 2023
59 checks passed
@tynes tynes deleted the ctb/l2-load-allocs branch November 27, 2023 21:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants